FICO vs SMWB Stock Comparison

Fair Isaac and Similarweb Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FICO Fair Isaac Corp
$691.94 -19.8% 1M -58.9% 1Y
Market cap
$14.94B
P/E
19.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.39B
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
7 wins
SMWB Similarweb Ltd.
$9.01 +18.1% 1M -0.7% 1Y
Market cap
$783.53M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$295.61M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Fair Isaac leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Fair Isaac 7, Similarweb 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFICOSMWBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.94B $783.53M FICO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.2x -35.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.8x 41.0x FICO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.1% +10.2% FICO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 34.1% -7.4% FICO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 62.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.3x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -58.9% -0.7% SMWB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.9%/yr -14.2%/yr FICO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.2% 81.1% FICO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 76/100 36/100 FICO

Percentile Scorecard

FICOSMWB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFICOSMWB
Valuation 68 #33 of 101 30 #71 of 101
Growth 81 #19 of 97 63 #37 of 97
Profitability 100 #1 of 94 42 #55 of 94
Financial Health 33 #73 of 108 22 #84 of 108
Shareholder Returns 98 #2 of 64 22 #50 of 64
Overall 76 36
  • FICO ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • SMWB ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFICOSMWBSPY
1 month -19.8%+18.1% -0.2%
3 months -48.2%+25.5% +3.9%
6 months -31.5%+233.7% +8.2%
Year to date -59.1%+20.3% +12.9%
1 year -58.9%-0.7% +12.3%
3 years -18.4%+77.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -6.6%+21.0% +23.3%
5 years +75.0%-53.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year +11.9%-14.2% +10.9%
10 years +477.5%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +19.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFICOSMWBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.2%81.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 81.5%89.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.361.79 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.88-0.01 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.1%-88.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -62.5%-2.8% -1.2%
52-week high $1,844.98$9.27 $779.14
52-week low $592.49$2.33 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFICOSMWB
P/E now vs peer median 19.2xmedian 28.3x -35.1xmedian 28.3x
P/S now vs peer median 6.2xmedian 2.8x 2.7xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 17.3x -308.7xmedian 17.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.0xmedian 15.8x 50.7xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median -3.6xmedian 3.2x 34.4xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.65median 0.85 -1.16median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFICOSMWB
Revenue $2.39B $295.61M
Gross profit $2.04B $235.99M
Operating income $1.24B -$11.06M
Net income $815.02M -$21.78M
Free cash flow $996.02M $15.44M
R&D $208.49M $73.83M
EPS (diluted) $35.90 $-0.26
Cash & equivalents $248.44M $73.90M
Total debt $5.58B –
Shares (diluted) 22.70M 84.82M
Enterprise value $14.18B $506.48M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFICOSMWB
P/E 19.2x -35.1x
P/FCF 15.0x 50.7x
P/Operating cash flow 14.9x 55.3x
P/S 6.2x 2.7x
P/B -3.6x 34.4x
P/Tangible book -3.6x 34.4x
EV/EBITDA 16.2x -308.7x
EV/EBIT 16.4x -64.1x
EV/Revenue 8.5x 2.4x
EV/FCF 20.4x 46.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.2x 50.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.65 -1.16

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFICOSMWB
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.1% 10.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.6% 12.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 29.2% 12.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 14.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 39.7% 50.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.5% 42.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 28.8% 25.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.9% 27.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 39.5% 28.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 29.5% 30.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 28.1% -30.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.6% 33.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 28.5% -29.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.7% 33.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFICOSMWB
Gross margin 85.1% 79.8%
EBITDA margin 52.3% -0.8%
Operating margin 51.7% -3.7%
Pretax margin 44.5% -5.9%
Net margin 34.1% -7.4%
FCF margin 41.6% 5.2%
Operating cash flow margin 41.8% 4.8%
Return on equity – -108.3%
Return on assets 39.9% -8.8%
Return on invested capital 62.6% –
Return on capital employed 95.3% -19.5%
Asset turnover 1.2x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x -0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 7.3% 6.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFICOSMWB
Debt / assets 274.0% –
Debt / equity -1.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 4.3x –
Debt / FCF 5.6x –
Liabilities / assets 301.1% 91.9%
Equity / assets -201.1% 8.1%
Interest coverage 6.6x –
Current ratio 1.2x 0.8x
Quick ratio 1.5x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 8.30 0.49

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFICOSMWB
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield 23.9% -0.3%
Shareholder yield 23.9% -0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFICOSMWB
Forward P/E 15.8xFY2026 41.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $43.69FY2026 $0.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +46.2%FY2026 +266.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +11.1% +36.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.41BFY2026 $332.14MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.0%FY2026 +17.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.5% +0.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFICOSMWB
Held by institutions 95.7% 45.9%
Institutions holding 842 68
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% -7.8%
Institutions buying 381 36
Institutions selling 343 18
Buyers to sellers 1.11 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FICOSMWB
FICO 1.00 0.17
SMWB 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FICO and SMWB?

Fair Isaac (FICO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fair Isaac (FICO) $14.94B, Similarweb (SMWB) $783.53M.

Which company is growing faster?

Fair Isaac (FICO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fair Isaac (FICO) +24.1%, Similarweb (SMWB) +10.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fair Isaac (FICO) has the highest net margin (Fair Isaac (FICO) 34.1%, Similarweb (SMWB) -7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Similarweb (SMWB) returned the most: Fair Isaac (FICO) -58.9%, Similarweb (SMWB) -0.7%. Over five years, Fair Isaac (FICO) compounded fastest (Fair Isaac (FICO) +11.9%/yr, Similarweb (SMWB) -14.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fair Isaac (FICO) has been the steadiest (Fair Isaac (FICO) 67.2%, Similarweb (SMWB) 81.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do FICO and SMWB move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.17, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, FICO and SMWB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fair Isaac (FICO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.