FICO vs HUCK vs MSA Stock Comparison

Fair Isaac, Huckleberry.ai and MSA Safety Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FICO Fair Isaac Corp
$707.11 -18.1% 1M -57.6% 1Y
Market cap
$15.70B
P/E
19.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.39B
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
7 wins
HUCK Huckleberry.ai, Inc.
$3.11 -7.7% 1M -77.2% 1Y
Market cap
$142.83M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$315.21M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
MSA MSA Safety Inc
$182.59 +0.1% 1M +8.6% 1Y
Market cap
$6.94B
P/E
22.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.95B
Div. yield
–
Power Tools Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fair Isaac leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Fair Isaac 7, MSA Safety 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFICOHUCKMSALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.70B $142.83M $6.94B FICO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.3x -3.4x 22.1x FICO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.2x 44.4x 19.6x FICO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.1% -1.0% +6.5% FICO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 34.1% -13.4% 16.1% FICO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 62.6% — 15.9% FICO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.3x 67.5x 0.8x MSA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -57.6% -77.2% +8.6% MSA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.4%/yr -48.7%/yr +3.7%/yr FICO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.3% 101.1% 25.5% MSA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 76/100 27/100 77/100 MSA

Percentile Scorecard

FICOHUCKMSA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFICOHUCKMSA
Valuation 69 #32 of 102 37 #65 of 102 55 #91 of 203
Growth 80 #20 of 98 36 #63 of 98 86 #27 of 187
Profitability 100 #1 of 95 37 #60 of 95 97 #7 of 185
Financial Health 33 #73 of 109 6 #103 of 109 76 #53 of 219
Shareholder Returns 98 #2 of 64 18 #53 of 64 73 #42 of 153
Overall 76 27 77
  • FICO ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • HUCK ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • MSA ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFICOHUCKMSASPY
1 month -18.1%-7.7%+0.1% -0.8%
3 months -44.7%-12.9%+4.0% +3.5%
6 months -30.3%-12.6%+6.8% +7.0%
Year to date -58.2%-63.1%+14.0% +12.2%
1 year -57.6%-77.2%+8.6% +13.0%
3 years -16.6%-61.2%+15.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year -5.9%-27.1%+5.0% +23.1%
5 years +79.0%-96.5%+20.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year +12.4%-48.7%+3.7% +11.0%
10 years +478.1%—+228.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +19.2%—+12.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFICOHUCKMSASPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.3%101.1%25.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 81.8%107.6%24.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.372.180.82 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.86-0.760.34 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.1%-97.8%-34.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -61.7%-77.8%-10.1% -1.8%
52-week high $1,844.98$14.01$203.08 $779.14
52-week low $592.49$2.00$152.94 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFICOHUCKMSA
P/E now vs peer median 19.7xmedian 28.8x -3.4xmedian 28.8x 22.5xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 2.8x 0.4xmedian 2.8x 3.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.5xmedian 17.7x 149.4xmedian 17.7x 15.3xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.3xmedian 15.8x -15.5xmedian 15.8x 19.9xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median -3.7xmedian 3.2x -0.7xmedian 3.2x 5.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.67median 0.85 -0.13median 0.85 0.12median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFICOHUCKMSA
Revenue $2.39B $315.21M $1.95B
Gross profit $2.04B $237.80M $925.88M
Operating income $1.24B -$30.85M $413.17M
Net income $815.02M -$42.15M $314.01M
Free cash flow $996.02M -$8.79M $354.30M
R&D $208.49M $74.68M $68.19M
EPS (diluted) $35.90 $-0.92 $8.11
Cash & equivalents $248.44M $25.10M $200.06M
Total debt $5.58B – $599.74M
Shares (diluted) 22.70M 46.00M 38.70M
Enterprise value $14.94B -$12.19M $6.22B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFICOHUCKMSA
P/E 19.7x -3.4x 22.5x
P/FCF 15.3x -15.5x 19.9x
P/Operating cash flow 15.2x -228.0x 17.4x
P/S 6.4x 0.4x 3.6x
P/B -3.7x -0.7x 5.0x
P/Tangible book -3.7x -0.7x 6.3x
EV/EBITDA 16.5x 149.4x 15.3x
EV/EBIT 16.7x -8.0x 18.0x
EV/Revenue 8.6x 0.8x 3.8x
EV/FCF 20.7x -28.2x 21.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.6x -415.9x 18.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.67 -0.13 0.12

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFICOHUCKMSA
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.1% -1.0% 6.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.6% -0.3% 5.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 29.2% 0.1% 8.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.6% -0.7% 6.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 39.7% 31.3% 10.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.5% 22.0% 34.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 28.8% 45.6% 13.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.9% 20.5% 186.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 39.5% 51.9% 15.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 29.5% 26.9% 188.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 28.1% -123.5% 26.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.6% 57.6% 96.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 28.5% -17.9% 40.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.7% 22.6% 72.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFICOHUCKMSA
Gross margin 85.1% 75.4% 47.6%
EBITDA margin 52.3% 0.5% 25.1%
Operating margin 51.7% -9.8% 21.2%
Pretax margin 44.5% -12.8% 21.1%
Net margin 34.1% -13.4% 16.1%
FCF margin 41.6% -2.8% 18.2%
Operating cash flow margin 41.8% -0.2% 20.9%
Return on equity – – 22.8%
Return on assets 39.9% -22.7% 12.2%
Return on invested capital 62.6% – 15.9%
Return on capital employed 95.3% – 18.0%
Asset turnover 1.2x 1.7x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 0.0x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 7.3% 16.2% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFICOHUCKMSA
Debt / assets 274.0% 78.4% 23.1%
Debt / equity -1.4x -0.7x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.3x 67.5x 0.8x
Debt / FCF 5.6x -15.6x 1.7x
Liabilities / assets 301.1% 207.1% 46.1%
Equity / assets -201.1% -107.1% 53.9%
Interest coverage 6.6x – 12.7x
Current ratio 1.2x 0.3x 3.2x
Quick ratio 1.5x 0.2x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 8.33 -12.86 5.99

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFICOHUCKMSA
Dividend yield – – 1.2%
Net buyback yield 23.4% -0.7% 1.8%
Shareholder yield 23.4% -0.7% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFICOHUCKMSA
Forward P/E 16.2xFY2026 44.4xFY2026 19.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $43.69FY2026 $0.07FY2026 $9.33FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +46.2%FY2026 – +17.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +11.1% -28.6% +3.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.41BFY2026 $301.44MFY2026 $1.98BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.0%FY2026 -5.5%FY2026 +5.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.5% -1.9% +19.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFICOHUCKMSA
Held by institutions 95.7% – 91.0%
Institutions holding 842 – 457
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% – +3.0%
Institutions buying 381 – 236
Institutions selling 343 – 147
Buyers to sellers 1.11 – 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FICOHUCKMSA
FICO 1.00 0.10 0.02
HUCK 0.10 1.00 0.08
MSA 0.02 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FICO, HUCK and MSA?

Fair Isaac (FICO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fair Isaac (FICO) $15.70B, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) $142.83M, MSA Safety (MSA) $6.94B.

Which stock is cheaper, FICO, HUCK and MSA?

Fair Isaac (FICO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fair Isaac (FICO) 19.3x, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -3.4x, MSA Safety (MSA) 22.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fair Isaac (FICO) is cheapest (Fair Isaac (FICO) 16.2x, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) 44.4x, MSA Safety (MSA) 19.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fair Isaac (FICO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fair Isaac (FICO) +24.1%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -1.0%, MSA Safety (MSA) +6.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fair Isaac (FICO) has the highest net margin (Fair Isaac (FICO) 34.1%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -13.4%, MSA Safety (MSA) 16.1%). On return on invested capital, Fair Isaac (FICO) leads (Fair Isaac (FICO) 62.6%, MSA Safety (MSA) 15.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year MSA Safety (MSA) returned the most: Fair Isaac (FICO) -57.6%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -77.2%, MSA Safety (MSA) +8.6%. Over five years, Fair Isaac (FICO) compounded fastest (Fair Isaac (FICO) +12.4%/yr, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -48.7%/yr, MSA Safety (MSA) +3.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MSA Safety (MSA) has been the steadiest (Fair Isaac (FICO) 67.3%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) 101.1%, MSA Safety (MSA) 25.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FICO, HUCK and MSA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fair Isaac (FICO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.