FICO vs GENI vs HUCK Stock Comparison

Fair Isaac, Genius Sports and Huckleberry.ai Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FICO Fair Isaac Corp
$698.28 -17.0% 1M -58.1% 1Y
Market cap
$15.08B
P/E
19.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.39B
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
6 wins
GENI Genius Sports Ltd
$6.36 +3.4% 1M -46.2% 1Y
Market cap
$3.22B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$790.23M
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
3 wins
HUCK Huckleberry.ai, Inc.
$3.11 -6.0% 1M -77.8% 1Y
Market cap
$136.13M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$315.21M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Fair Isaac leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Fair Isaac 6, Genius Sports 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFICOGENIHUCKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.08B $3.22B $136.13M FICO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.4x -8.9x -3.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.0x — 44.4x FICO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.1% +41.5% -1.0% GENI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 34.1% -23.0% -13.4% FICO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 62.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.3x -12.0x 67.5x GENI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -58.1% -46.2% -77.8% GENI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.9%/yr -19.3%/yr -48.8%/yr FICO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.2% 74.8% 100.9% FICO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 76/100 36/100 26/100 FICO

Percentile Scorecard

FICOGENIHUCK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFICOGENIHUCK
Valuation 67 #34 of 101 47 #66 of 124 34 #67 of 101
Growth 81 #19 of 97 32 #77 of 113 35 #63 of 97
Profitability 100 #1 of 94 45 #60 of 109 37 #60 of 94
Financial Health 34 #72 of 108 18 #105 of 127 5 #103 of 108
Shareholder Returns 98 #2 of 64 – 18 #53 of 64
Overall 76 36 26
  • FICO ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • GENI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • HUCK ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFICOGENIHUCKSPY
1 month -17.0%+3.4%-6.0% +0.9%
3 months -49.1%-13.1%-14.3% +5.9%
6 months -33.1%+49.6%-11.4% +8.5%
Year to date -58.7%-42.3%-63.1% +13.3%
1 year -58.1%-46.2%-77.8% +12.4%
3 years -17.7%+35.6%-61.2% +88.1%
3 years, per year -6.3%+10.7%-27.1% +23.5%
5 years +75.4%-65.7%-96.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year +11.9%-19.3%-48.8% +11.0%
10 years +486.0%—— +263.4%
10 years, per year +19.3%—— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureFICOGENIHUCKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.2%74.8%100.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 81.8%75.7%107.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.361.692.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.86-0.62-0.77 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.1%-88.4%-97.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -62.2%-46.2%-77.8% -0.9%
52-week high $1,844.98$11.82$14.01 $779.14
52-week low $592.49$3.92$2.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFICOGENIHUCK
P/E now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 27.6x -8.9xmedian 37.9x -3.4xmedian 27.6x
P/S now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 2.7x 4.1xmedian 4.4x 0.4xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.3xmedian 17.4x -73.3xmedian 34.5x 149.4xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.1xmedian 15.8x -64.7xmedian 26.6x -15.5xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median -3.7xmedian 3.2x 4.7xmedian 3.4x -0.7xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.66median 0.84 -1.43median 1.24 -0.13median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFICOGENIHUCK
Revenue $2.39B $790.23M $315.21M
Gross profit $2.04B $216.86M $237.80M
Operating income $1.24B -$148.94M -$30.85M
Net income $815.02M -$181.64M -$42.15M
Free cash flow $996.02M -$49.83M -$8.79M
R&D $208.49M $38.20M $74.68M
EPS (diluted) $35.90 $-0.71 $-0.92
Cash & equivalents $248.44M $155.08M $25.10M
Total debt $5.58B $785.33M –
Shares (diluted) 22.70M 254.76M 46.00M
Enterprise value $14.32B $2.38B -$18.89M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFICOGENIHUCK
P/E 19.4x -8.9x -3.4x
P/FCF 15.1x -64.7x -15.5x
P/Operating cash flow 15.1x -103.7x -228.0x
P/S 6.3x 4.1x 0.4x
P/B -3.7x 4.7x -0.7x
P/Tangible book -3.7x -45.7x -0.7x
EV/EBITDA 16.3x -73.3x 149.4x
EV/EBIT 16.5x -25.9x -8.0x
EV/Revenue 8.5x 4.9x 0.8x
EV/FCF 20.5x -77.3x -28.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.4x -124.0x -415.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.66 -1.43 -0.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFICOGENIHUCK
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.1% 41.5% -1.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.6% 29.0% -0.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 29.2% 64.8% 0.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 71.2% -0.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 39.7% -30.2% 31.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.5% -11.0% 22.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 28.8% -133.3% 45.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.9% -1.8% 20.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 39.5% -93.2% 51.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 29.5% 6.3% 26.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 28.1% -158.3% -123.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.6% -9.0% 57.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 28.5% -211.2% -17.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.7% -20.2% 22.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFICOGENIHUCK
Gross margin 85.1% 27.4% 75.4%
EBITDA margin 52.3% -6.7% 0.5%
Operating margin 51.7% -18.8% -9.8%
Pretax margin 44.5% -21.3% -12.8%
Net margin 34.1% -23.0% -13.4%
FCF margin 41.6% -6.3% -2.8%
Operating cash flow margin 41.8% -3.9% -0.2%
Return on equity – -0.1% –
Return on assets 39.9% -11.0% -22.7%
Return on invested capital 62.6% – –
Return on capital employed 95.3% -13.6% –
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.5x 1.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 0.2x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 7.3% 11.8% 16.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFICOGENIHUCK
Debt / assets 274.0% 37.1% 78.4%
Debt / equity -1.4x 1.1x -0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.3x -12.0x 67.5x
Debt / FCF 5.6x -15.8x -15.6x
Liabilities / assets 301.1% 67.7% 207.1%
Equity / assets -201.1% 32.3% -107.1%
Interest coverage 6.6x – –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.0x 0.3x
Quick ratio 1.5x 0.8x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 8.31 0.60 -12.86

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFICOGENIHUCK
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 23.7% – -0.7%
Shareholder yield 23.7% – -0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFICOGENIHUCK
Forward P/E 16.0xFY2026 – 44.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $43.69FY2026 $-0.31FY2026 $0.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +46.2%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +11.1% – -28.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.41BFY2026 $1.05BFY2026 $301.44MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.0%FY2026 +57.2%FY2026 -5.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.5% +16.9% -1.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFICOGENIHUCK
Held by institutions 95.7% 93.6% –
Institutions holding 842 273 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% +7.7% –
Institutions buying 381 179 –
Institutions selling 343 70 –
Buyers to sellers 1.11 2.56 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FICOGENIHUCK
FICO 1.00 0.27 0.10
GENI 0.27 1.00 0.29
HUCK 0.10 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FICO, GENI and HUCK?

Fair Isaac (FICO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fair Isaac (FICO) $15.08B, Genius Sports (GENI) $3.22B, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) $136.13M.

Which company is growing faster?

Genius Sports (GENI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fair Isaac (FICO) +24.1%, Genius Sports (GENI) +41.5%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -1.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fair Isaac (FICO) has the highest net margin (Fair Isaac (FICO) 34.1%, Genius Sports (GENI) -23.0%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -13.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Genius Sports (GENI) returned the most: Fair Isaac (FICO) -58.1%, Genius Sports (GENI) -46.2%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -77.8%. Over five years, Fair Isaac (FICO) compounded fastest (Fair Isaac (FICO) +11.9%/yr, Genius Sports (GENI) -19.3%/yr, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -48.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fair Isaac (FICO) has been the steadiest (Fair Isaac (FICO) 67.2%, Genius Sports (GENI) 74.8%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) 100.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FICO, GENI and HUCK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fair Isaac (FICO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.