FGPR vs NGL vs CETY Stock Comparison

Ferrellgas Partners L P, NGL Energy Partners and Clean Energy Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NGL NGL Energy Partners LP
$15.95 +5.5% 1M +152.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.03B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.52B
Div. yield
–
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Ferrellgas Partners L P leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ferrellgas Partners L P 4, NGL Energy Partners 3, Clean Energy Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFGPRNGLCETYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $120.81M $2.03B $10.91M NGL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 1.6x -5.8x -1.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 12.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.6% +5.8% +89.4% CETY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.1% -9.9% -258.7% FGPR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 38.5% 4.8% -30.7% FGPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.9x 8.0x -2.8x CETY
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.6% +152.8% -66.1% NGL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.2%/yr +46.6%/yr — NGL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.0% 51.5% 141.4% FGPR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 36/100 17/100 FGPR

Percentile Scorecard

FGPRNGLCETY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFGPRNGLCETY
Valuation 77 #6 of 23 53 #17 of 35 13 #53 of 61
Growth 33 #13 of 19 6 #32 of 34 16 #49 of 58
Profitability 77 #5 of 18 12 #30 of 34 15 #47 of 55
Financial Health 9 #22 of 24 9 #32 of 35 24 #54 of 71
Shareholder Returns – 100 #1 of 31 –
Overall 49 36 17
  • FGPR ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • NGL ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • CETY ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFGPRNGLCETYSPY
1 month -7.6%+5.5%-15.3% -0.8%
3 months -11.4%+6.2%-8.8% +3.5%
6 months -21.6%+10.2%+1.2% +7.0%
Year to date +9.8%+59.5%+13.7% +12.2%
1 year +6.6%+152.8%-66.1% +13.0%
3 years +160.6%+285.3%-96.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +37.7%+56.8%-67.1% +23.1%
5 years -14.9%+575.8%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -3.2%+46.6%— +11.0%
10 years —-16.3%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —-1.8%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFGPRNGLCETYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.0%51.5%141.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.8%43.1%124.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.070.360.82 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.182.97-0.47 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.4%-61.5%-99.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.7%-16.0%-67.1% -1.8%
52-week high $27.20$18.98$2.52 $779.14
52-week low $17.07$6.35$0.46 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFGPRNGLCETY
P/E now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 9.5x -5.7xmedian 21.0x -1.5xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.3x 0.6xmedian 2.7x 3.8xmedian 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 7.3x 12.9xmedian 11.0x -11.6xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 9.5x 19.5xmedian 16.6x -1.3xmedian 27.3x
P/B now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 1.9x -8.4xmedian 2.6x 1.7xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -0.05median 0.35 0.09median 1.92 0.26median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFGPRNGLCETY
Revenue $1.86B $3.52B $2.64M
Gross profit $1.03B $1.04B -$36.28K
Operating income $196.22M $142.60M -$2.89M
Net income $76.61M -$131.86M -$6.83M
Free cash flow $86.92M $101.88M -$8.05M
EPS (diluted) $9.30 $-2.73 $-0.56
Cash & equivalents $73.41M $5.07M $19.74K
Total debt $5.98B $3.28B $11.36M
Shares (diluted) 8.22M 128.09M 12.17M
Enterprise value -$197.71M $2.00B $9.19M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFGPRNGLCETY
P/E 1.6x -5.7x -1.5x
P/FCF 1.4x 19.5x -1.3x
P/Operating cash flow 0.7x 4.9x -1.3x
P/S 0.1x 0.6x 3.8x
P/B -0.1x -8.4x 1.7x
P/Tangible book -0.1x -1.9x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA 5.3x 12.9x -11.6x
EV/EBIT 8.1x 36.9x -4.6x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 1.5x 5.0x
EV/FCF 18.3x 51.6x -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.3x 12.8x -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.05 0.09 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFGPRNGLCETY
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.6% 5.8% 89.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.5% -4.9% -8.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.8% 6.0% -103.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.0% 2.3% -27.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 106.9% -58.6% -8.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.0% -14.6% -12.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 847.0% -228.9% -69.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -19.6% -67.4% -79.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 575.6% -560.3% 48.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.4% -63.2% -5.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.5% 8.1% -130.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.0% -6.3% -30.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -25.5% -39.9% -130.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.0% -34.1% -30.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFGPRNGLCETY
Gross margin 55.1% 29.5% -1.4%
EBITDA margin 16.1% 11.6% -43.2%
Operating margin 10.5% 4.0% -109.4%
Pretax margin 4.2% -3.7% -258.7%
Net margin 4.1% -9.9% -258.7%
FCF margin 4.7% 2.9% -304.9%
Operating cash flow margin 9.1% 11.6% -304.9%
Return on equity – – -106.7%
Return on assets 5.1% -3.1% -49.9%
Return on invested capital 38.5% 4.8% -30.7%
Return on capital employed 17.0% 4.0% -47.3%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.8x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x -3.1x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFGPRNGLCETY
Debt / assets 105.2% 78.4% 22.9%
Debt / equity -1.4x -13.8x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.9x 8.0x -2.8x
Debt / FCF 17.8x 32.2x -0.4x
Liabilities / assets 172.8% 105.7% 57.0%
Equity / assets -72.8% -5.7% 43.0%
Interest coverage 1.7x 0.6x -0.7x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.1x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.0x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 1.76 – -3.45

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFGPRNGLCETY
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 18.2% –
Shareholder yield – 18.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFGPRNGLCETY
Forward P/E – 12.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.30FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +31.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $3.82BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +21.0%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – -6.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFGPRNGLCETY
Held by institutions 0.0% 60.3% –
Institutions holding 1 88 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.5% –
Institutions buying 0 25 –
Institutions selling 0 29 –
Buyers to sellers – 0.86 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FGPRNGLCETY
FGPR 1.00 0.01 -0.08
NGL 0.01 1.00 -0.05
CETY -0.08 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FGPR, NGL and CETY?

NGL Energy Partners (NGL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) $120.81M, NGL Energy Partners (NGL) $2.03B, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) $10.91M.

Which company is growing faster?

Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.6%, NGL Energy Partners (NGL) +5.8%, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) +89.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) has the highest net margin (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 4.1%, NGL Energy Partners (NGL) -9.9%, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) -258.7%). On return on invested capital, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) leads (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 38.5%, NGL Energy Partners (NGL) 4.8%, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) -30.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NGL Energy Partners (NGL) returned the most: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) +6.6%, NGL Energy Partners (NGL) +152.8%, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) -66.1%. Over five years, NGL Energy Partners (NGL) compounded fastest (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.2%/yr, NGL Energy Partners (NGL) +46.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) has been the steadiest (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 37.0%, NGL Energy Partners (NGL) 51.5%, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) 141.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FGPR, NGL and CETY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.