FGPR vs ET vs CPK Stock Comparison

Ferrellgas Partners L P, Energy Transfer and Chesapeake Utilities Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ET Energy Transfer LP
$20.61 +2.0% 1M +23.2% 1Y
Market cap
$70.87B
P/E
14.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38B
Div. yield
0.07%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
8 wins
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corp
$134.97 +4.8% 1M +2.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.27B
P/E
21.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$993.50M
Div. yield
0.02%
Regulated Electric Utilities Utilities
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Energy Transfer leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Energy Transfer 8, Ferrellgas Partners L P 2, Chesapeake Utilities 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFGPRETCPKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $120.75M $70.87B $3.27B ET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 1.6x 14.0x 21.7x FGPR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.5x 21.6x ET
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.6% +33.3% +14.6% ET
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.1% 4.7% 15.1% CPK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 38.5% 8.4% 6.6% FGPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.9x 4.0x 4.7x ET
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.07% 0.02% ET
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.6% +23.2% +2.4% ET
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.2%/yr +16.2%/yr +1.0%/yr ET
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.0% 17.5% 20.3% ET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 63/100 66/100 CPK

Percentile Scorecard

FGPRETCPK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFGPRETCPK
Valuation 77 #6 of 23 94 #3 of 35 39 #41 of 67
Growth 33 #13 of 19 61 #14 of 34 94 #5 of 65
Profitability 77 #5 of 18 30 #24 of 34 73 #18 of 64
Financial Health 9 #22 of 24 59 #15 of 35 59 #27 of 64
Shareholder Returns – 70 #10 of 31 64 #25 of 67
Overall 49 63 66
  • FGPR ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • ET ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • CPK ranked among 67 companies in Regulated Utilities

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFGPRETCPKSPY
1 month -7.6%+2.0%+4.8% -0.8%
3 months -11.4%+3.5%-0.6% +3.5%
6 months -21.6%+8.2%+6.2% +7.0%
Year to date +9.8%+25.0%+8.2% +12.2%
1 year +6.6%+23.2%+2.4% +13.0%
3 years +160.6%+57.2%+52.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year +37.7%+16.3%+15.2% +23.1%
5 years -14.9%+111.8%+5.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year -3.2%+16.2%+1.0% +11.0%
10 years —+30.9%+114.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+2.7%+7.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFGPRETCPKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.0%17.5%20.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.8%16.6%21.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.07-0.21-0.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.181.330.12 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.4%-25.8%-40.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.7%-5.2%-2.9% -1.8%
52-week high $27.20$21.74$139.06 $779.14
52-week low $17.07$16.21$118.97 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFGPRETCPK
P/E now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 9.5x 14.1xmedian 21.0x 21.6xmedian 20.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.3x 0.7xmedian 2.7x 3.3xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 7.3x 8.2xmedian 11.0x 13.6xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 9.5x 13.6xmedian 16.6x -16.8xmedian 36.7x
P/B now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 1.9x 1.4xmedian 2.6x 1.9xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -0.05median 0.35 2.01median 1.92 2.74median 2.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFGPRETCPK
Revenue $1.86B $107.38B $993.50M
Gross profit $1.03B $25.32B $669.70M
Operating income $196.22M $10.78B $271.10M
Net income $76.61M $7.04B $150.20M
Free cash flow $86.92M $5.22B -$193.50M
EPS (diluted) $9.30 $1.46 $6.21
Cash & equivalents $73.41M $1.02B $400.00K
Total debt $5.98B $68.41B $1.69B
Shares (diluted) 8.22M 3.46B 24.17M
Enterprise value -$197.77M $64.06B $3.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFGPRETCPK
P/E 1.6x 14.1x 21.6x
P/FCF 1.4x 13.6x -16.8x
P/Operating cash flow 0.7x 5.9x 10.6x
P/S 0.1x 0.7x 3.3x
P/B -0.1x 1.4x 1.9x
P/Tangible book -0.1x 1.6x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 5.3x 8.2x 13.6x
EV/EBIT 8.1x 12.8x 18.2x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 1.3x 5.0x
EV/FCF 18.3x 26.5x -25.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.3x 11.4x 16.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.05 2.01 2.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFGPRETCPK
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.6% 33.3% 14.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.5% 10.0% 13.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.8% 18.9% 11.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.0% 13.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 106.9% 16.5% 10.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 12.0% 23.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 847.0% 16.1% 16.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -19.6% 9.0% 19.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 575.6% 12.6% 12.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.4% 7.0% 7.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.5% 8.8% 45.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.0% 5.9% 18.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -25.5% -8.5% 3.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.0% -7.3% -102.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFGPRETCPK
Gross margin 55.1% 23.6% 67.4%
EBITDA margin 16.1% 15.7% 36.5%
Operating margin 10.5% 10.0% 27.3%
Pretax margin 4.2% 7.1% 20.8%
Net margin 4.1% 4.7% 15.1%
FCF margin 4.7% 4.9% -19.5%
Operating cash flow margin 9.1% 11.3% 31.0%
Return on equity – 14.0% 9.0%
Return on assets 5.1% 4.8% 3.6%
Return on invested capital 38.5% 8.4% 6.6%
Return on capital employed 17.0% 8.4% 7.7%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.7x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x 1.7x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.2% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFGPRETCPK
Debt / assets 105.2% 46.2% 40.4%
Debt / equity -1.4x 1.4x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.9x 4.0x 4.7x
Debt / FCF 17.8x 13.1x -8.7x
Liabilities / assets 172.8% 65.9% 59.9%
Equity / assets -72.8% 34.1% 40.1%
Interest coverage 1.7x 2.9x 3.7x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.2x 0.3x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.9x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 1.76 – 1.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFGPRETCPK
Dividend yield – 6.5% 2.1%
Net buyback yield – – -2.4%
Shareholder yield – 6.5% -0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 67.9% 42.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 91.6% -33.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.9% 11.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.0% 19.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFGPRETCPK
Forward P/E – 11.5xFY2026 21.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.80FY2026 $6.24FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +48.8%FY2026 +3.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -9.4% +15.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $124.23BFY2026 $1.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +45.2%FY2026 +17.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +1.4% +4.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFGPRETCPK
Held by institutions 0.0% 31.4% 92.3%
Institutions holding 1 1,279 333
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.9% +4.2%
Institutions buying 0 628 188
Institutions selling 0 340 98
Buyers to sellers – 1.85 1.92

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FGPRETCPK
FGPR 1.00 -0.05 -0.12
ET -0.05 1.00 0.11
CPK -0.12 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FGPR, ET and CPK?

Energy Transfer (ET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) $120.75M, Energy Transfer (ET) $70.87B, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) $3.27B.

Which stock is cheaper, FGPR, ET and CPK?

Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 1.6x, Energy Transfer (ET) 14.0x, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 21.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Energy Transfer (ET) is cheapest (Energy Transfer (ET) 11.5x, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 21.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Energy Transfer (ET) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.6%, Energy Transfer (ET) +33.3%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +14.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) has the highest net margin (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 4.1%, Energy Transfer (ET) 4.7%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 15.1%). On return on invested capital, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) leads (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 38.5%, Energy Transfer (ET) 8.4%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Energy Transfer (ET) returned the most: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) +6.6%, Energy Transfer (ET) +23.2%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +2.4%. Over five years, Energy Transfer (ET) compounded fastest (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.2%/yr, Energy Transfer (ET) +16.2%/yr, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +1.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Energy Transfer (ET) has the highest dividend yield: Energy Transfer (ET) 0.07%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 0.02%. Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Energy Transfer (ET) has been the steadiest (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 37.0%, Energy Transfer (ET) 17.5%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 20.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FGPR, ET and CPK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Energy Transfer (ET) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.