FGPR vs CPK vs TMDE Stock Comparison

Ferrellgas Partners L P, Chesapeake Utilities and TMD Energy Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corp
$134.97 +4.8% 1M +2.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.25B
P/E
21.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$993.50M
Div. yield
0.02%
Regulated Electric Utilities Utilities
7 wins
TMDE TMD Energy Ltd
$0.58 -13.4% 1M -27.5% 1Y
Market cap
$12.39M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Fuel Distribution Energy

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Chesapeake Utilities leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Chesapeake Utilities 7, Ferrellgas Partners L P 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFGPRCPKTMDELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $120.81M $3.25B $12.39M CPK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 1.6x 21.6x -1.5x FGPR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 21.6x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.6% +14.6% — CPK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.1% 15.1% — CPK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 38.5% 6.6% — FGPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.9x 4.7x — CPK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.6% +2.4% -27.5% FGPR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.2%/yr +1.0%/yr — CPK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.0% 20.3% 219.0% CPK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 66/100 — CPK

Percentile Scorecard

FGPRCPKTMDE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFGPRCPKTMDE
Valuation 77 #6 of 23 39 #41 of 67 73 #7 of 23
Growth 33 #13 of 19 94 #5 of 65 –
Profitability 77 #5 of 18 73 #18 of 64 –
Financial Health 9 #22 of 24 59 #27 of 64 13 #21 of 24
Shareholder Returns – 64 #25 of 67 –
Overall 49 66 –
  • FGPR ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • CPK ranked among 67 companies in Regulated Utilities
  • TMDE ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFGPRCPKTMDESPY
1 month -7.6%+4.8%-13.4% -0.8%
3 months -11.4%-0.6%-28.4% +3.5%
6 months -21.6%+6.2%-50.8% +7.0%
Year to date +9.8%+8.2%+36.5% +12.2%
1 year +6.6%+2.4%-27.5% +13.0%
3 years +160.6%+52.7%— +86.3%
3 years, per year +37.7%+15.2%— +23.1%
5 years -14.9%+5.2%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -3.2%+1.0%— +11.0%
10 years —+114.2%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+7.9%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFGPRCPKTMDESPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.0%20.3%219.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.8%21.2%161.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.07-0.24-2.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.180.12-0.13 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.4%-40.5%-92.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.7%-2.9%-85.6% -1.8%
52-week high $27.20$139.06$4.04 $779.14
52-week low $17.07$118.97$0.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFGPRCPKTMDE
P/E now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 9.5x 21.6xmedian 20.8x -1.5xmedian 9.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.3x 3.3xmedian 2.9x 0.1xmedian 0.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 7.3x 13.6xmedian 13.1x —median 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 9.5x -16.8xmedian 36.7x —median 9.5x
P/B now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 1.9x 1.9xmedian 1.7x 1.0xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median -0.05median 0.35 2.74median 2.23 —median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFGPRCPKTMDE
Revenue $1.86B $993.50M –
Gross profit $1.03B $669.70M –
Operating income $196.22M $271.10M –
Net income $76.61M $150.20M –
Free cash flow $86.92M -$193.50M –
EPS (diluted) $9.30 $6.21 –
Cash & equivalents $73.41M $400.00K $8.41M
Total debt $5.98B $1.69B $293.09M
Shares (diluted) 8.22M 24.17M 21.36M
Enterprise value -$197.71M $3.24B -$23.99M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFGPRCPKTMDE
P/E 1.6x 21.6x -1.5x
P/FCF 1.4x -16.8x –
P/Operating cash flow 0.7x 10.6x –
P/S 0.1x 3.3x 0.1x
P/B -0.1x 1.9x 1.0x
P/Tangible book -0.1x 2.0x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA 5.3x 13.6x –
EV/EBIT 8.1x 18.2x –
EV/Revenue 0.9x 5.0x –
EV/FCF 18.3x -25.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 9.3x 16.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.05 2.74 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFGPRCPKTMDE
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.6% 14.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.5% 13.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.8% 11.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.0% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 106.9% 10.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 23.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 847.0% 16.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -19.6% 19.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) 575.6% 12.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.4% 7.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.5% 45.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.0% 18.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -25.5% 3.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.0% -102.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFGPRCPKTMDE
Gross margin 55.1% 67.4% –
EBITDA margin 16.1% 36.5% –
Operating margin 10.5% 27.3% –
Pretax margin 4.2% 20.8% –
Net margin 4.1% 15.1% –
FCF margin 4.7% -19.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 9.1% 31.0% –
Return on equity – 9.0% –
Return on assets 5.1% 3.6% –
Return on invested capital 38.5% 6.6% –
Return on capital employed 17.0% 7.7% –
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x 2.1x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFGPRCPKTMDE
Debt / assets 105.2% 40.4% 73.7%
Debt / equity -1.4x 1.0x 6.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.9x 4.7x –
Debt / FCF 17.8x -8.7x –
Liabilities / assets 172.8% 59.9% 89.2%
Equity / assets -72.8% 40.1% 10.8%
Interest coverage 1.7x 3.7x –
Current ratio 1.1x 0.3x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.2x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.76 1.34 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFGPRCPKTMDE
Dividend yield – 2.1% –
Net buyback yield – -2.4% –
Shareholder yield – -0.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 42.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -33.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 11.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 19.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFGPRCPKTMDE
Forward P/E – 21.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.24FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +3.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +15.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.09BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +17.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +4.7% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFGPRCPKTMDE
Held by institutions 0.0% 92.3% –
Institutions holding 1 333 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +4.2% –
Institutions buying 0 188 –
Institutions selling 0 98 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.92 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FGPRCPKTMDE
FGPR 1.00 -0.12 0.11
CPK -0.12 1.00 -0.09
TMDE 0.11 -0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FGPR, CPK and TMDE?

Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) $120.81M, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) $3.25B, TMD Energy (TMDE) $12.39M.

Which stock is cheaper, FGPR, CPK and TMDE?

Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 1.6x, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 21.6x, TMD Energy (TMDE) -1.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.6%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +14.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) has the highest net margin (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 4.1%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 15.1%). On return on invested capital, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) leads (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 38.5%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) returned the most: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) +6.6%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +2.4%, TMD Energy (TMDE) -27.5%. Over five years, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) compounded fastest (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.2%/yr, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +1.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 0.00%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 0.02%, TMD Energy (TMDE) 0.00%. Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) and TMD Energy (TMDE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) has been the steadiest (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 37.0%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 20.3%, TMD Energy (TMDE) 219.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FGPR, CPK and TMDE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.