FGPR vs BWLP vs GLP Stock Comparison

Ferrellgas Partners L P, Bw Lpg and Global Partners Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BWLP BW LPG Ltd
$26.04 +7.6% 1M +109.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.86B
P/E
13.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.61B
Div. yield
–
Fuel Distribution Energy
7 wins
GLP Global Partners Lp
$48.20 +1.5% 1M +5.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.62B
P/E
9.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.46B
Div. yield
0.08%
Fuel Distribution Energy
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Bw Lpg leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Bw Lpg 7, Ferrellgas Partners L P 2, Global Partners 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFGPRBWLPGLPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $120.81M $3.86B $1.62B BWLP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 1.6x 13.6x 9.3x FGPR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 5.7x 7.8x BWLP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.6% -2.5% +20.4% GLP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.1% 10.9% 0.8% BWLP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 38.5% 13.0% 14.9% FGPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.9x 0.8x 2.6x BWLP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.08% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.6% +109.8% +5.3% BWLP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.2%/yr +38.2%/yr +15.1%/yr BWLP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.0% 39.4% 30.2% GLP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 61/100 48/100 BWLP

Percentile Scorecard

FGPRBWLPGLP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFGPRBWLPGLP
Valuation 77 #6 of 23 36 #15 of 23 64 #9 of 23
Growth 33 #13 of 19 0 #19 of 19 56 #9 of 19
Profitability 77 #5 of 18 82 #4 of 18 18 #15 of 18
Financial Health 9 #22 of 24 87 #4 of 24 30 #17 of 24
Shareholder Returns – 100 #1 of 18 71 #6 of 18
Overall 49 61 48
  • FGPR ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • BWLP ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • GLP ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFGPRBWLPGLPSPY
1 month -7.6%+7.6%+1.5% -0.8%
3 months -11.4%+23.6%0.0% +3.5%
6 months -21.6%+38.7%+4.5% +7.0%
Year to date +9.8%+98.8%+15.2% +12.2%
1 year +6.6%+109.8%+5.3% +13.0%
3 years +160.6%+97.3%+61.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +37.7%+25.4%+17.4% +23.1%
5 years -14.9%+402.7%+101.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year -3.2%+38.2%+15.1% +11.0%
10 years —+726.7%+201.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+23.5%+11.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFGPRBWLPGLPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.0%39.4%30.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.8%41.1%30.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.070.380.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.182.790.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.4%-61.2%-33.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.7%-1.0%-10.7% -1.8%
52-week high $27.20$26.31$54.00 $779.14
52-week low $17.07$11.99$39.58 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFGPRBWLPGLP
P/E now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 9.5x 13.9xmedian 9.5x 9.4xmedian 9.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.3x 1.5xmedian 0.3x 0.1xmedian 0.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 7.3x 7.1xmedian 7.3x 6.0xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 9.5x 5.5xmedian 9.5x 8.2xmedian 9.5x
P/B now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 1.9x 1.9xmedian 1.9x 2.2xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median -0.05median 0.35 —median 0.35 -1.03median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFGPRBWLPGLP
Revenue $1.86B $2.61B $21.46B
Gross profit $1.03B – $1.20B
Operating income $196.22M $360.05M $331.81M
Net income $76.61M $504.96M $195.20M
Free cash flow $86.92M $721.10M $199.43M
EPS (diluted) $9.30 $1.87 $5.11
Cash & equivalents $73.41M $303.86M $23.91M
Total debt $5.98B $3.13B $1.31B
Shares (diluted) 8.22M 151.90M 34.12M
Enterprise value -$197.71M $2.85B $1.45B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFGPRBWLPGLP
P/E 1.6x 13.9x 9.4x
P/FCF 1.4x 5.5x 8.2x
P/Operating cash flow 0.7x 10.6x 5.0x
P/S 0.1x 1.5x 0.1x
P/B -0.1x 1.9x 2.2x
P/Tangible book -0.1x 1.9x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA 5.3x 7.1x 6.0x
EV/EBIT 8.1x 12.4x 8.8x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 1.7x 0.1x
EV/FCF 18.3x 6.2x 14.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.3x 12.0x 8.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.05 – -1.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFGPRBWLPGLP
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.6% -2.5% 20.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.5% – 8.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.8% – 10.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.0% – 3.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 106.9% 11.0% 28.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.0% – -0.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 847.0% 86.9% 71.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -19.6% – -6.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 575.6% -68.3% 80.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.4% – -9.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.5% -32.7% -8.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.0% – -1.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -25.5% -37.3% -20.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.0% – -5.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFGPRBWLPGLP
Gross margin 55.1% – 5.6%
EBITDA margin 16.1% 24.0% 2.2%
Operating margin 10.5% 13.8% 1.5%
Pretax margin 4.2% 13.1% 0.9%
Net margin 4.1% 10.9% 0.8%
FCF margin 4.7% 27.6% 0.9%
Operating cash flow margin 9.1% 14.2% 1.5%
Return on equity – 24.8% 26.7%
Return on assets 5.1% 15.0% 4.7%
Return on invested capital 38.5% 13.0% 14.9%
Return on capital employed 17.0% 13.4% 11.2%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.8x 5.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x 0.7x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.0% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFGPRBWLPGLP
Debt / assets 105.2% 24.0% 32.5%
Debt / equity -1.4x 0.4x 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.9x 0.8x 2.6x
Debt / FCF 17.8x 1.1x 6.6x
Liabilities / assets 172.8% 39.4% 81.4%
Equity / assets -72.8% 60.6% 18.6%
Interest coverage 1.7x 3.8x –
Current ratio 1.1x 1.4x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.1x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.5x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 1.76 3.28 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFGPRBWLPGLP
Dividend yield – 80.3% 6.4%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 80.3% 6.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 66.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 64.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 5.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -2.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFGPRBWLPGLP
Forward P/E – 5.7xFY2026 7.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.57FY2026 $6.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +290.6%FY2026 +193.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -59.3% -41.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.20BFY2026 $26.25BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +69.7%FY2026 +41.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -31.6% +37.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFGPRBWLPGLP
Held by institutions 0.0% 16.1% 49.8%
Institutions holding 1 105 115
Change in shares held, QoQ – +18.9% +1.7%
Institutions buying 0 62 60
Institutions selling 0 23 17
Buyers to sellers – 2.70 3.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FGPRBWLPGLP
FGPR 1.00 -0.05 -0.09
BWLP -0.05 1.00 0.22
GLP -0.09 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FGPR, BWLP and GLP?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) $120.81M, Bw Lpg (BWLP) $3.86B, Global Partners (GLP) $1.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, FGPR, BWLP and GLP?

Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 1.6x, Bw Lpg (BWLP) 13.6x, Global Partners (GLP) 9.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bw Lpg (BWLP) is cheapest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 5.7x, Global Partners (GLP) 7.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Global Partners (GLP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.6%, Bw Lpg (BWLP) -2.5%, Global Partners (GLP) +20.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) has the highest net margin (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 4.1%, Bw Lpg (BWLP) 10.9%, Global Partners (GLP) 0.8%). On return on invested capital, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) leads (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 38.5%, Bw Lpg (BWLP) 13.0%, Global Partners (GLP) 14.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bw Lpg (BWLP) returned the most: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) +6.6%, Bw Lpg (BWLP) +109.8%, Global Partners (GLP) +5.3%. Over five years, Bw Lpg (BWLP) compounded fastest (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.2%/yr, Bw Lpg (BWLP) +38.2%/yr, Global Partners (GLP) +15.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 0.00%, Bw Lpg (BWLP) 0.00%, Global Partners (GLP) 0.08%. Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) and Bw Lpg (BWLP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Global Partners (GLP) has been the steadiest (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 37.0%, Bw Lpg (BWLP) 39.4%, Global Partners (GLP) 30.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FGPR, BWLP and GLP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bw Lpg (BWLP) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.