FGL vs SMXT vs TAAG Stock Comparison

Founder, SolarMax Technology and Awareness Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FGL Founder Group Ltd
$1.79 -58.7% 1M -94.7% 1Y
Market cap
$488.03K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Solar Installers Industrials
TAAG Awareness Group, Inc.
$0.01 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$584.09K
P/E
1.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.41M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

SolarMax Technology leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (SolarMax Technology 4, Awareness 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFGLSMXTTAAGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $488.03K $20.79M $584.09K SMXT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.3x -2.6x 1.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +284.7% -65.3% SMXT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -7.9% 10.7% TAAG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -24.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -5.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -94.7% +335.1% 0.0% SMXT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -47.9%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 516.9% 269.9% 345.6% SMXT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 23/100 54/100 TAAG

Percentile Scorecard

FGLSMXTTAAG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFGLSMXTTAAG
Valuation 77 #13 of 52 26 #39 of 52 80 #35 of 170
Growth – 58 #16 of 37 48 #83 of 160
Profitability – 11 #33 of 37 72 #42 of 149
Financial Health 29 #41 of 57 11 #51 of 57 14 #136 of 158
Shareholder Returns – 8 #25 of 27 –
Overall – 23 54
  • FGL ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • SMXT ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • TAAG ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFGLSMXTTAAGSPY
1 month -58.7%+84.8%0.0% -0.8%
3 months +72.1%+1,150.0%0.0% +3.5%
6 months +1.7%+608.1%0.0% +7.0%
Year to date -89.0%+417.8%-50.0% +12.2%
1 year -94.7%+335.1%0.0% +13.0%
3 years ——-93.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year ——-59.5% +23.1%
5 years ——-96.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year ——-47.9% +11.0%
10 years ——-98.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——-32.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFGLSMXTTAAGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 516.9%269.9%345.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 204.3%107.9%899.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.782.172.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.181.240.00 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-98.1%-99.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -96.6%-23.3%-80.0% -1.8%
52-week high $52.09$5.54$0.05 $779.14
52-week low $0.15$0.29$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFGLSMXTTAAG
P/E now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 25.7x -2.5xmedian 25.7x 1.0xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 0.8x 0.2xmedian 0.8x 0.1xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.9x -8.1xmedian 12.9x —median 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 22.5x -4.7xmedian 22.5x 0.0xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 2.3x -1.3xmedian 2.3x -0.7xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.56 —median 0.56 —median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFGLSMXTTAAG
Revenue – $102.25M $5.41M
Gross profit – $7.67M $2.73M
Operating income – -$7.73M $1.51M
Net income – -$8.09M $1.32M
Free cash flow – -$4.28M $17.35M
EPS (diluted) – $-1.71 $0.01
Cash & equivalents $19.76M $2.16M $217.29K
Total debt $42.13M $43.35M –
Shares (diluted) 330.34K 4.74M 59.61M
Enterprise value $488.03K $641.73K $289.71K

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFGLSMXTTAAG
P/E -0.3x -2.5x 1.0x
P/FCF -0.1x -4.7x 0.0x
P/Operating cash flow – -4.7x -2.7x
P/S 0.0x 0.2x 0.1x
P/B 0.1x -1.3x -0.7x
P/Tangible book 0.1x -1.3x -0.7x
EV/EBITDA – -8.1x –
EV/EBIT – -7.9x 0.2x
EV/Revenue – 0.6x 0.1x
EV/FCF – -14.3x 0.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – -14.3x -1.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFGLSMXTTAAG
Revenue growth (1Y) – 284.7% -65.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 81.9% -66.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 47.6% -77.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 80.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – 51.6% -81.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 89.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – 61.0% -91.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -187.4% 69.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -64.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -187.4% 2,159%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 613.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFGLSMXTTAAG
Gross margin – 7.5% 50.5%
EBITDA margin – -7.4% –
Operating margin – -7.6% 27.9%
Pretax margin – -8.9% 24.2%
Net margin – -7.9% 10.7%
FCF margin – -4.2% 320.6%
Operating cash flow margin – -4.2% -4.0%
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets – -7.5% 4.2%
Return on invested capital – -24.2% –
Return on capital employed – -13.1% 8.0%
Asset turnover – 0.9x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.5x -0.2x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFGLSMXTTAAG
Debt / assets 33.4% 39.2% –
Debt / equity 2.1x -2.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -5.4x –
Debt / FCF – -10.1x –
Liabilities / assets 84.1% 114.6% 102.6%
Equity / assets 15.9% -14.6% -2.6%
Interest coverage – -5.5x –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.0x 0.3x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.8x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – -0.68 -0.03

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFGLSMXTTAAG
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -19.3% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% -19.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFGLSMXTTAAG

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFGLSMXTTAAG
Held by institutions – 3.2% –
Institutions holding – 19 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – -11.1% –
Institutions buying – 8 –
Institutions selling – 7 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.14 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FGLSMXTTAAG
FGL 1.00 -0.08 -0.01
SMXT -0.08 1.00 0.03
TAAG -0.01 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FGL, SMXT and TAAG?

SolarMax Technology (SMXT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Founder (FGL) $488.03K, SolarMax Technology (SMXT) $20.79M, Awareness (TAAG) $584.09K.

Which company is growing faster?

SolarMax Technology (SMXT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: SolarMax Technology (SMXT) +284.7%, Awareness (TAAG) -65.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Awareness (TAAG) has the highest net margin (SolarMax Technology (SMXT) -7.9%, Awareness (TAAG) 10.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year SolarMax Technology (SMXT) returned the most: Founder (FGL) -94.7%, SolarMax Technology (SMXT) +335.1%, Awareness (TAAG) 0.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, SolarMax Technology (SMXT) has been the steadiest (Founder (FGL) 516.9%, SolarMax Technology (SMXT) 269.9%, Awareness (TAAG) 345.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FGL, SMXT and TAAG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, SolarMax Technology (SMXT) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.