FGL vs ATPC Stock Comparison

Founder and Agape ATP Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FGL Founder Group Ltd
$1.79 -58.7% 1M -94.7% 1Y
Market cap
$591.30K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Solar Installers Industrials
1 win
ATPC Agape ATP Corp
$1.37 -38.8% 1M -97.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.37M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
2 wins

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Agape ATP leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Agape ATP 2, Founder 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFGLATPCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $591.30K $1.37M ATPC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.3x -1.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -94.7% -97.8% FGL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 516.9% 375.6% ATPC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — –

Percentile Scorecard

FGLATPC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFGLATPC
Valuation 76 #6 of 22 –
Growth – 81 #5 of 22
Profitability – –
Financial Health 27 #20 of 27 –
Shareholder Returns – –
Overall – –
  • FGL ranked among 27 companies in Construction Services
  • ATPC ranked among 30 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFGLATPCSPY
1 month -58.7%-38.8% -0.8%
3 months +72.1%-43.4% +3.5%
6 months +1.7%-31.5% +7.0%
Year to date -89.0%-74.4% +12.2%
1 year -94.7%-97.8% +13.0%
3 years —-99.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-87.8% +23.1%

Risk

MeasureFGLATPCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 516.9%375.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 204.3%423.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.78-1.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.18-0.26 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -96.6%-98.0% -1.8%
52-week high $52.09$69.00 $779.14
52-week low $0.15$1.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFGLATPC
P/E now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 36.1x -1.2xmedian 14.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 1.0x —median 6.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.8x —median 11.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 18.5x —median 5.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 1.7x —median 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.34 0.03median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFGLATPC
Net income – -$1.23M
EPS (diluted) – $-1.15
Cash & equivalents $19.76M –
Total debt $42.13M –
Shares (diluted) 330.34K 1.00M
Enterprise value -$29.29M $1.37M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFGLATPC
P/E -0.3x -1.2x
P/FCF -0.1x –
P/Operating cash flow – –
P/S 0.0x –
P/B 0.1x –
P/Tangible book 0.1x –
EV/EBITDA – –
EV/EBIT – -0.5x
EV/Revenue – –
EV/FCF – –
EV/Operating cash flow – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFGLATPC
Revenue growth (1Y) – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – –
Net income growth (1Y) – 54.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 11.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 56.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -34.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFGLATPC
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin – –
Operating margin – –
Pretax margin – –
Net margin – –
FCF margin – –
Operating cash flow margin – –
Return on equity – –
Return on assets – –
Return on invested capital – –
Return on capital employed – –
Asset turnover – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – –
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFGLATPC
Debt / assets 33.4% –
Debt / equity 2.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – –
Debt / FCF – –
Liabilities / assets 84.1% –
Equity / assets 15.9% –
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio 1.2x –
Quick ratio 1.0x –
Cash ratio 0.9x –
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFGLATPC
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFGLATPC

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FGLATPC
FGL 1.00 -0.01
ATPC -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FGL and ATPC?

Agape ATP (ATPC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Founder (FGL) $591.30K, Agape ATP (ATPC) $1.37M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Founder (FGL) returned the most: Founder (FGL) -94.7%, Agape ATP (ATPC) -97.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Agape ATP (ATPC) has been the steadiest (Founder (FGL) 516.9%, Agape ATP (ATPC) 375.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do FGL and ATPC move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of -0.01, a negative relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, FGL and ATPC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Agape ATP (ATPC) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.