FGL vs CNTM vs ATPC Stock Comparison

Founder, ConnectM Technology Solutions and Agape ATP Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FGL Founder Group Ltd
$1.79 -58.7% 1M -94.7% 1Y
Market cap
$491.15K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Solar Installers Industrials
ATPC Agape ATP Corp
$1.37 -38.8% 1M -97.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.38M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

ConnectM Technology Solutions leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (ConnectM Technology Solutions 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFGLCNTMATPCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $491.15K $23.76M $1.38M CNTM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.3x 10.2x -1.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +23.6% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 6.3% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -94.7% -47.1% -97.8% CNTM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 516.9% 132.4% 375.6% CNTM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 56/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

FGLCNTMATPC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFGLCNTMATPC
Valuation 77 #13 of 52 85 #20 of 124 –
Growth – 71 #33 of 113 80 #11 of 50
Profitability – 55 #50 of 110 –
Financial Health 29 #41 of 57 12 #114 of 129 –
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall – 56 –
  • FGL ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • CNTM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ATPC ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFGLCNTMATPCSPY
1 month -58.7%-20.0%-38.8% -0.8%
3 months +72.1%-25.7%-43.4% +3.5%
6 months +1.7%-47.2%-31.5% +7.0%
Year to date -89.0%-68.0%-74.4% +12.2%
1 year -94.7%-47.1%-97.8% +13.0%
3 years —-98.8%-99.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-77.0%-87.8% +23.1%

Risk

MeasureFGLCNTMATPCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 516.9%132.4%375.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 204.3%132.1%423.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.78-0.10-1.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.18-0.36-0.26 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-100.0%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -96.6%-73.8%-98.0% -1.8%
52-week high $52.09$16.00$69.00 $779.14
52-week low $0.15$3.90$1.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFGLCNTMATPC
P/E now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 25.7x 10.2xmedian 38.1x -1.2xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 0.8x 0.7xmedian 4.3x —median 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.9x —median 35.4x —median 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 22.5x —median 27.1x —median 18.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 2.3x 1.5xmedian 3.4x —median 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.56 0.38median 1.27 0.03median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFGLCNTMATPC
Revenue – $36.02M –
Gross profit – $11.16M –
Operating income – -$12.45M –
Net income – $2.42M -$1.23M
EPS (diluted) – $0.03 $-1.15
Cash & equivalents $19.76M $2.39M –
Total debt $42.13M $56.72M –
Shares (diluted) 330.34K 72.32M 1.00M
Enterprise value $491.15K $13.75M $1.38M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFGLCNTMATPC
P/E -0.3x 10.2x -1.2x
P/FCF -0.1x – –
P/Operating cash flow – – –
P/S 0.0x 0.7x –
P/B 0.1x 1.5x –
P/Tangible book 0.1x 1.7x –
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT – -3.0x -0.5x
EV/Revenue – 1.1x –
EV/FCF – – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.38 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFGLCNTMATPC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 23.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 35.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 19.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -62.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 108.3% 54.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 31.4% 11.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 106.0% 56.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 26.7% -34.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFGLCNTMATPC
Gross margin – 31.0% –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – -34.6% –
Pretax margin – -41.0% –
Net margin – 6.3% –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity – 27.8% –
Return on assets – 5.4% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -149.0% –
Asset turnover – 0.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFGLCNTMATPC
Debt / assets 33.4% 31.1% –
Debt / equity 2.1x 1.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 84.1% 70.1% –
Equity / assets 15.9% 29.9% –
Interest coverage – -7.6x –
Current ratio 1.2x 0.2x –
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.1x –
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – -1.86 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFGLCNTMATPC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFGLCNTMATPC
EPS, next fiscal year – $-3.87FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $76.76MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +114.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +15.7% –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FGLCNTMATPC
FGL 1.00 -0.02 -0.01
CNTM -0.02 1.00 -0.06
ATPC -0.01 -0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FGL, CNTM and ATPC?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Founder (FGL) $491.15K, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) $23.76M, Agape ATP (ATPC) $1.38M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) returned the most: Founder (FGL) -94.7%, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) -47.1%, Agape ATP (ATPC) -97.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) has been the steadiest (Founder (FGL) 516.9%, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 132.4%, Agape ATP (ATPC) 375.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FGL, CNTM and ATPC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.