FGC vs CLUS vs GSRF Stock Comparison

FG Communities Holdings, Cluster Group Holdings and GSR IV Acquisition Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GSRF GSR IV Acquisition Corp.
$10.27 +0.4% 1M +2.3% 1Y
Market cap
$604.58M
P/E
103.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Investment Banking Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Cluster Group Holdings leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Cluster Group Holdings 3, GSR IV Acquisition 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFGCCLUSGSRFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $36.63M $8.00B $604.58M CLUS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.3x -1,146,093x 103.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +230.0% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4,953.9% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -129.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -69.3% 0.0% +2.3% GSRF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -58.9%/yr -39.1%/yr — CLUS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 96.9% 0.0% 1.4% CLUS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

FGCCLUSGSRF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFGCCLUSGSRF
Valuation 10 #87 of 97 – 54 #45 of 97
Growth 5 #65 of 68 78 #16 of 68 –
Profitability 3 #65 of 67 – –
Financial Health 92 #9 of 97 – 81 #19 of 97
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 40 – –
Overall 42 – –
  • FGC ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets
  • CLUS ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets
  • GSRF ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFGCCLUSGSRFSPY
1 month -25.1%0.0%+0.4% -0.8%
3 months -16.1%0.0%+1.1% +3.5%
6 months -15.4%0.0%+1.9% +7.0%
Year to date -57.5%0.0%+2.8% +12.2%
1 year -69.3%0.0%+2.3% +13.0%
3 years -96.4%-31.5%— +86.3%
3 years, per year -67.1%-11.9%— +23.1%
5 years -98.8%-91.6%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -58.9%-39.1%— +11.0%
10 years -99.4%+33.3%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -40.0%+2.9%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFGCCLUSGSRFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 96.9%0.0%1.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 98.7%—2.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.380.000.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.72—1.59 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.5%-99.5%-1.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -71.2%0.0%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $20.25$200.00$10.27 $779.14
52-week low $4.23$200.00$9.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFGCCLUSGSRF
P/E now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 29.4x -1,146,093xmedian 29.4x 103.1xmedian 29.4x
P/S now vs peer median 13.4xmedian 2.9x —median 2.9x —median 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 13.7x —median 13.7x —median 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.5xmedian 16.0x —median 16.0x -2,067xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.3x -105,257xmedian 2.3x -76.0xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 0.52 —median 0.52 —median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFGCCLUSGSRF
Revenue $2.44M – –
Operating income -$102.50M -$50.23K -$1.17M
Net income -$119.39M -$6.98K $5.86M
Free cash flow -$13.06M – –
EPS (diluted) $-19.90 $0.00 $0.20
Cash & equivalents $24.92M – $643.33K
Total debt $7.51M – –
Shares (diluted) 6.08M 40.00M 29.41M
Enterprise value -$23.33M $8.00B $598.73M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFGCCLUSGSRF
P/E -0.3x -1,146,093x 103.1x
P/FCF -2.5x – -2,067x
P/Operating cash flow -2.5x – –
P/S 13.4x – –
P/B 0.5x -105,257x -76.0x
P/Tangible book 0.5x -105,257x -76.0x
EV/EBITDA -0.1x – –
EV/EBIT -0.1x -159,282x -517.2x
EV/Revenue 3.9x – –
EV/FCF -0.7x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -0.7x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFGCCLUSGSRF
Revenue growth (1Y) 230.0% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -59.9% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -1,059% -16.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.9% 83.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -149.6% – –
EPS growth (1Y) -270.5% 98.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -452.3% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -197.9% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.2% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -195.2% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.8% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFGCCLUSGSRF
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin -4,185% – –
Operating margin -4,197% – –
Pretax margin -4,665% – –
Net margin -4,954% – –
FCF margin -534.8% – –
Operating cash flow margin -534.8% – –
Return on equity -154.2% – –
Return on assets -144.7% – 2.5%
Return on invested capital -129.3% – –
Return on capital employed – – -0.5%
Asset turnover 0.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x – –
Stock comp / revenue 336.3% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFGCCLUSGSRF
Debt / assets 2.6% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x – –
Debt / FCF -0.1x – –
Liabilities / assets 7.5% – 103.3%
Equity / assets 92.5% – -3.3%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – – 34.7x
Quick ratio – – 30.8x
Cash ratio – – 30.8x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFGCCLUSGSRF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 66.0% – –
Shareholder yield 66.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFGCCLUSGSRF
EPS, next fiscal year $-12.23FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.04MFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY -56.7%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -9.1% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFGCCLUSGSRF
Held by institutions – – 35.7%
Institutions holding – – 44
Change in shares held, QoQ – – -0.9%
Institutions buying – – 9
Institutions selling – – 9
Buyers to sellers – – 1.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FGCCLUSGSRF
FGC 1.00 – 0.09
CLUS – – –
GSRF 0.09 – 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FGC, CLUS and GSRF?

Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) is the largest by market capitalisation: FG Communities Holdings (FGC) $36.63M, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) $8.00B, GSR IV Acquisition (GSRF) $604.58M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year GSR IV Acquisition (GSRF) returned the most: FG Communities Holdings (FGC) -69.3%, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) 0.0%, GSR IV Acquisition (GSRF) +2.3%. Over five years, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) compounded fastest (FG Communities Holdings (FGC) -58.9%/yr, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) -39.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) has been the steadiest (FG Communities Holdings (FGC) 96.9%, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) 0.0%, GSR IV Acquisition (GSRF) 1.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FGC, CLUS and GSRF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.