FFLO vs LKQ vs MNRO Stock Comparison

Free Flow USA, Lkq and Monro Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FFLO Free Flow USA, Inc.
$0.31 +29.2% 1M +55.0% 1Y
Market cap
$9.61M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$33.90K
Div. yield
–
Auto Parts Retail Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
LKQ Lkq Corp
$17.10 -26.6% 1M -45.7% 1Y
Market cap
$4.33B
P/E
9.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.69B
Div. yield
7.02%
Consumer Goods Distributors Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
MNRO Monro, Inc.
$14.16 +3.1% 1M -21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$425.08M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
7.91%
Auto Parts Retail Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Lkq leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lkq 5, Free Flow USA 3, Monro 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFFLOLKQMNROLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.61M $4.33B $425.08M LKQ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -50.7x 9.4x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 6.8x 118.0x LKQ
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1,020.7% +1.3% — FFLO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -558.8% 3.4% — LKQ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.3% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 7.02% 7.91% MNRO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +55.0% -45.7% -21.9% FFLO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.3%/yr -21.2%/yr -25.5%/yr FFLO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 225.1% 44.1% 62.4% LKQ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 23/100 60/100 — LKQ

Percentile Scorecard

FFLOLKQMNRO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFFLOLKQMNRO
Valuation 3 #101 of 104 87 #14 of 104 –
Growth 77 #24 of 99 11 #88 of 99 –
Profitability 9 #89 of 98 60 #40 of 98 –
Financial Health 4 #108 of 112 47 #60 of 112 37 #71 of 112
Shareholder Returns – 93 #6 of 72 96 #4 of 72
Overall 23 60 –
  • FFLO ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • LKQ ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • MNRO ranked among 115 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFFLOLKQMNROSPY
1 month +29.2%-26.6%+3.1% -0.2%
3 months +287.5%-35.6%-17.7% +3.9%
6 months +520.0%-45.0%-16.7% +8.2%
Year to date +675.0%-43.4%-29.3% +12.9%
1 year +55.0%-45.7%-21.9% +12.3%
3 years +24.0%-60.7%-45.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +7.4%-26.8%-18.4% +23.3%
5 years +63.2%-69.7%-77.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +10.3%-21.2%-25.5% +10.9%
10 years -69.0%-46.3%-74.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year -11.1%-6.0%-12.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFFLOLKQMNROSPY
Volatility, 1Y 225.1%44.1%62.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —52.8%70.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.240.601.94 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.24-1.04-0.35 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.9%-71.5%-82.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.4%-50.9%-40.5% -1.2%
52-week high $0.35$34.80$23.81 $779.14
52-week low $0.04$17.10$11.27 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFFLOLKQMNRO
P/E now vs peer median -50.7xmedian 16.7x 9.4xmedian 16.7x —median 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 283.5xmedian 0.5x 0.3xmedian 0.5x —median 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.0x 6.2xmedian 9.0x —median 9.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.5x 6.9xmedian 16.5x —median 16.5x
P/B now vs peer median -8.1xmedian 1.7x 0.7xmedian 1.7x 0.7xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.72 -0.44median 0.72 —median 0.72

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFFLOLKQMNRO
Revenue $33.90K $13.69B –
Gross profit $33.90K $5.25B –
Operating income -$92.19K $869.00M –
Net income -$189.44K $461.00M –
Free cash flow – $625.00M –
EPS (diluted) – $1.81 –
Cash & equivalents $4.19K $301.00M $14.63M
Total debt $2.00M $3.93B $387.59M
Shares (diluted) – 254.70M 31.40M
Enterprise value $9.51M $3.11B $387.26M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFFLOLKQMNRO
P/E -50.7x 9.4x –
P/FCF – 6.9x –
P/Operating cash flow – 5.3x –
P/S 283.5x 0.3x –
P/B -8.1x 0.7x 0.7x
P/Tangible book -8.1x 0.8x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA – 6.2x –
EV/EBIT -109.6x 9.2x –
EV/Revenue 298.1x 0.6x –
EV/FCF – 12.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 9.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.44 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFFLOLKQMNRO
Revenue growth (1Y) 1,021% 1.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -21.6% 2.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1,412% -0.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 57.5% -0.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 57.1% -22.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 23.6% -15.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 7.1% -35.2% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -24.6% -23.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) – -34.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -21.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -13.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -12.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -7.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -13.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFFLOLKQMNRO
Gross margin 100.0% 38.3% –
EBITDA margin – 9.4% –
Operating margin -272.0% 6.3% –
Pretax margin -228.5% 4.9% –
Net margin -558.8% 3.4% –
FCF margin – 4.6% –
Operating cash flow margin – 6.0% –
Return on equity – 7.1% –
Return on assets -38.2% 3.1% –
Return on invested capital – 6.3% –
Return on capital employed -714.6% 7.4% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.9x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFFLOLKQMNRO
Debt / assets 252.6% 26.2% 6.2%
Debt / equity -0.4x 0.6x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.8x –
Debt / FCF – 6.3x –
Liabilities / assets 702.7% 56.9% 62.3%
Equity / assets -602.7% 43.1% 37.7%
Interest coverage – 4.0x –
Current ratio 1.0x 1.6x 0.5x
Quick ratio 0.0x 0.5x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score -9.24 2.31 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFFLOLKQMNRO
Dividend yield – 7.0% 7.9%
Net buyback yield – 3.1% –
Shareholder yield – 10.1% 7.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFFLOLKQMNRO
Forward P/E – 6.8xFY2026 118.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.50FY2026 $0.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -16.9%FY2026 -71.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +19.2% +275.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $12.80BFY2026 $1.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -6.2%FY2026 +1.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +12.8% -2.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFFLOLKQMNRO
Held by institutions – 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 533 182
Change in shares held, QoQ – -1.5% -7.2%
Institutions buying – 263 96
Institutions selling – 214 65
Buyers to sellers – 1.23 1.48

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FFLOLKQMNRO
FFLO 1.00 -0.08 -0.05
LKQ -0.08 1.00 0.33
MNRO -0.05 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FFLO, LKQ and MNRO?

Lkq (LKQ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Free Flow USA (FFLO) $9.61M, Lkq (LKQ) $4.33B, Monro (MNRO) $425.08M.

Which company is growing faster?

Free Flow USA (FFLO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Free Flow USA (FFLO) +1,020.7%, Lkq (LKQ) +1.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lkq (LKQ) has the highest net margin (Free Flow USA (FFLO) -558.8%, Lkq (LKQ) 3.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Free Flow USA (FFLO) returned the most: Free Flow USA (FFLO) +55.0%, Lkq (LKQ) -45.7%, Monro (MNRO) -21.9%. Over five years, Free Flow USA (FFLO) compounded fastest (Free Flow USA (FFLO) +10.3%/yr, Lkq (LKQ) -21.2%/yr, Monro (MNRO) -25.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Monro (MNRO) has the highest dividend yield: Lkq (LKQ) 7.02%, Monro (MNRO) 7.91%. Free Flow USA (FFLO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lkq (LKQ) has been the steadiest (Free Flow USA (FFLO) 225.1%, Lkq (LKQ) 44.1%, Monro (MNRO) 62.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FFLO, LKQ and MNRO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lkq (LKQ) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.