FFIV vs PANW vs RSKD Stock Comparison

F5, Palo Alto Networks and Riskified Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FFIV F5, Inc.
$459.36 +3.7% 1M +58.2% 1Y
Market cap
$20.75B
P/E
28.7x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
3 wins
PANW Palo Alto Networks Inc
$401.70 +7.2% 1M +82.4% 1Y
Market cap
$296.28B
P/E
965.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.48B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
4 wins
RSKD Riskified Ltd.
$8.98 +15.4% 1M +82.5% 1Y
Market cap
$1.41B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$368.15M
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Palo Alto Networks leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Palo Alto Networks 4, F5 3, Riskified 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFFIVPANWRSKDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $20.75B $296.28B $1.41B PANW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.7x 965.1x -90.4x FFIV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.3x 91.9x 32.1x FFIV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +24.5% +9.6% PANW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 2.7% -4.2% PANW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +58.2% +82.4% +82.5% RSKD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.6%/yr +37.1%/yr -14.1%/yr PANW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.0% 49.6% 43.7% FFIV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 50/100 59/100 RSKD

Percentile Scorecard

FFIVPANWRSKD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFFIVPANWRSKD
Valuation 69 #39 of 124 42 #72 of 124 72 #36 of 124
Growth 38 #70 of 113 38 #71 of 113 80 #24 of 113
Profitability – 76 #27 of 109 58 #46 of 109
Financial Health – 38 #79 of 127 75 #32 of 127
Shareholder Returns – 55 #30 of 65 11 #58 of 65
Overall – 50 59
  • FFIV ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • PANW ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • RSKD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFFIVPANWRSKDSPY
1 month +3.7%+7.2%+15.4% -0.2%
3 months +13.9%+25.9%+66.9% +3.9%
6 months +51.2%+121.9%+101.3% +8.2%
Year to date +80.0%+118.1%+80.7% +12.9%
1 year +58.2%+82.4%+82.5% +12.3%
3 years +206.7%+236.5%+145.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year +45.3%+49.9%+34.9% +23.3%
5 years +115.1%+383.6%-53.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year +16.6%+37.1%-14.1% +10.9%
10 years +250.7%+1,510.7%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +13.4%+32.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFFIVPANWRSKDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.0%49.6%43.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.4%46.9%37.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.081.250.86 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.661.661.89 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -47.4%-36.0%-82.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.3%-4.3%-2.6% -1.2%
52-week high $479.83$419.91$9.22 $779.14
52-week low $223.99$141.67$3.79 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFFIVPANWRSKD
P/E now vs peer median 36.1xmedian 38.6x 980.0xmedian 38.6x -90.8xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 4.4x 28.5xmedian 4.4x 3.8xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.5x 151.5xmedian 34.5x -542.4xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.7xmedian 29.4x 79.6xmedian 29.4x 29.4xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 3.3x 11.9xmedian 3.3x 6.8xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.49median 1.28 -67.72median 1.28 -2.33median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFFIVPANWRSKD
Revenue – $11.48B $368.15M
Gross profit $2.80B $8.08B $188.72M
Operating income $818.22M $695.00M -$17.28M
Net income $722.15M $307.00M -$15.58M
Free cash flow – $4.11B $48.05M
R&D $621.42M $2.55B $69.17M
EPS (diluted) $12.55 $0.40 $-0.10
Cash & equivalents $1.59B $2.51B $105.24M
Shares (diluted) 57.55M 764.00M 157.46M
Enterprise value $20.75B $281.35B $305.07M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFFIVPANWRSKD
P/E 36.1x 980.0x -90.8x
P/FCF 25.7x 79.6x 29.4x
P/Operating cash flow 27.2x 71.9x 29.9x
P/S 7.5x 28.5x 3.8x
P/B 6.5x 11.9x 6.8x
P/Tangible book 6.5x 16.0x 6.8x
EV/EBITDA – 151.5x -542.4x
EV/EBIT – 466.6x -69.2x
EV/Revenue – 28.3x 3.2x
EV/FCF – 78.9x 24.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.2x 71.2x 25.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.49 -67.72 -2.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFFIVPANWRSKD
Revenue growth (1Y) – 24.5% 9.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 18.5% 9.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.3% 19.3% 12.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 17.5% 8.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.8% -44.1% 63.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.1% 21.5% 42.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.3% -72.9% 60.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 22.3% -11.3% 40.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 6.4% -74.9% 57.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.2% -14.5% 39.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.0% 22.5% 38.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.7% 17.9% 82.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 18.6% 37.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.1% 99.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFFIVPANWRSKD
Gross margin – 70.4% 51.3%
EBITDA margin – 18.6% -0.6%
Operating margin – 6.1% -4.7%
Pretax margin – 4.7% -2.7%
Net margin – 2.7% -4.2%
FCF margin – 35.8% 13.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 39.7% 12.9%
Return on equity – 1.1% -6.5%
Return on assets – 0.6% -4.5%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – 1.9% -6.3%
Asset turnover – 0.2x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 14.8x -3.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 15.5% 12.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFFIVPANWRSKD
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets – 43.3% 36.9%
Equity / assets 56.7% 56.7% 63.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.7x 0.9x 3.6x
Quick ratio – 0.7x 3.4x
Cash ratio – 0.3x 2.8x
Altman Z-score – 9.70 6.55

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFFIVPANWRSKD
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -0.1% -11.2%
Shareholder yield – -0.1% -11.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFFIVPANWRSKD
Forward P/E 28.3xFY2026 91.9xFY2027 32.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $16.24FY2026 $4.37FY2027 $0.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +2.7%FY2026 +13.8%FY2027 +40.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.0% +16.5% +46.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.52BFY2026 $13.37BFY2027 $389.54MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.8%FY2026 +16.5%FY2027 +13.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.4% +12.7% +9.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFFIVPANWRSKD
Held by institutions 96.6% 82.1% 32.7%
Institutions holding 831 2,914 111
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.6% +6.6% -3.8%
Institutions buying 483 1,547 57
Institutions selling 240 1,125 25
Buyers to sellers 2.01 1.38 2.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FFIVPANWRSKD
FFIV 1.00 0.36 0.25
PANW 0.36 1.00 0.24
RSKD 0.25 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FFIV, PANW and RSKD?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is the largest by market capitalisation: F5 (FFIV) $20.75B, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) $296.28B, Riskified (RSKD) $1.41B.

Which stock is cheaper, FFIV, PANW and RSKD?

F5 (FFIV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (F5 (FFIV) 28.7x, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 965.1x, Riskified (RSKD) -90.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, F5 (FFIV) is cheapest (F5 (FFIV) 28.3x, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 91.9x, Riskified (RSKD) 32.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +24.5%, Riskified (RSKD) +9.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) has the highest net margin (Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 2.7%, Riskified (RSKD) -4.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Riskified (RSKD) returned the most: F5 (FFIV) +58.2%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +82.4%, Riskified (RSKD) +82.5%. Over five years, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) compounded fastest (F5 (FFIV) +16.6%/yr, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +37.1%/yr, Riskified (RSKD) -14.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, F5 (FFIV) has been the steadiest (F5 (FFIV) 35.0%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 49.6%, Riskified (RSKD) 43.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FFIV, PANW and RSKD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.