FFIV vs AKAM vs FTNT Stock Comparison

F5, Akamai Technologies and Fortinet Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FFIV F5, Inc.
$461.60 +4.2% 1M +54.7% 1Y
Market cap
$26.07B
P/E
35.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.31B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
1 win
AKAM Akamai Technologies Inc
$98.50 -13.6% 1M +31.2% 1Y
Market cap
$14.30B
P/E
34.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.32B
Div. yield
–
Content Delivery Networks Technology
3 wins
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$183.33 +5.7% 1M +114.3% 1Y
Market cap
$135.79B
P/E
64.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.53B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Fortinet leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Fortinet 6, Akamai Technologies 3, F5 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFFIVAKAMFTNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $26.07B $14.30B $135.79B FTNT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.9x 34.8x 64.0x AKAM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.4x 15.6x 51.2x AKAM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.4% +5.9% +18.8% FTNT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 22.0% 9.5% 28.2% FTNT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 111.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.4x -1.2x AKAM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +54.7% +31.2% +114.3% FTNT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.4%/yr -1.1%/yr +23.4%/yr FTNT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.1% 61.5% 42.8% FFIV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 63/100 69/100 FTNT

Percentile Scorecard

FFIVAKAMFTNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFFIVAKAMFTNT
Valuation 75 #32 of 124 89 #5 of 38 49 #64 of 124
Growth 40 #68 of 113 14 #31 of 36 64 #41 of 113
Profitability 94 #8 of 110 79 #8 of 34 100 #1 of 110
Financial Health 52 #63 of 129 78 #9 of 38 55 #59 of 129
Shareholder Returns 59 #28 of 67 55 #10 of 21 76 #17 of 67
Overall 64 63 69
  • FFIV ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • AKAM ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • FTNT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFFIVAKAMFTNTSPY
1 month +4.2%-13.6%+5.7% -0.8%
3 months +13.1%-12.7%+20.3% +3.5%
6 months +55.0%+2.7%+114.0% +7.0%
Year to date +80.8%+12.9%+130.9% +12.2%
1 year +54.7%+31.2%+114.3% +13.0%
3 years +208.2%-3.4%+225.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +45.6%-1.2%+48.3% +23.1%
5 years +113.7%-5.6%+185.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year +16.4%-1.1%+23.4% +11.0%
10 years +286.1%+45.5%+2,935.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year +14.5%+3.8%+40.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFFIVAKAMFTNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.1%61.5%42.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.6%58.4%37.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.081.410.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.560.512.67 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -47.4%-46.8%-38.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.8%-38.9%-5.9% -1.8%
52-week high $479.83$161.14$194.75 $779.14
52-week low $223.99$71.97$75.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFFIVAKAMFTNT
P/E now vs peer median 36.0xmedian 38.1x 34.7xmedian 29.6x 63.4xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 7.9xmedian 4.3x 3.3xmedian 4.2x 17.9xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.1xmedian 35.4x 10.5xmedian 24.2x 44.1xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.1xmedian 27.1x 14.8xmedian 15.1x 43.1xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median 6.8xmedian 3.4x 3.0xmedian 3.9x 86.7xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.13median 1.27 -6.96median 0.38 2.18median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFFIVAKAMFTNT
Revenue $3.31B $4.32B $7.53B
Gross profit $2.71B $2.48B $6.04B
Operating income $812.13M $455.68M $2.44B
Net income $726.51M $410.97M $2.12B
Free cash flow $969.60M $956.10M $3.12B
R&D $593.25M $554.57M $846.40M
EPS (diluted) $12.62 $2.67 $2.87
Cash & equivalents $1.61B $1.48B $2.93B
Total debt – $1.71B $2.99B
Shares (diluted) 57.55M 153.69M 739.90M
Enterprise value $20.48B $7.71B $121.72B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFFIVAKAMFTNT
P/E 36.0x 34.7x 63.4x
P/FCF 27.1x 14.8x 43.1x
P/Operating cash flow 25.0x 9.8x 39.6x
P/S 7.9x 3.3x 17.9x
P/B 6.8x 3.0x 86.7x
P/Tangible book 6.8x 3.4x 91.2x
EV/EBITDA 27.1x 10.5x 44.1x
EV/EBIT 30.3x 27.4x 53.6x
EV/Revenue 7.4x 2.9x 17.4x
EV/FCF 25.4x 13.1x 42.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 23.5x 8.6x 38.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.13 -6.96 2.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFFIVAKAMFTNT
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.4% 5.9% 18.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.7% 5.7% 14.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.5% 2.9% 17.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.1% 3.8% 16.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.1% -13.2% 24.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.8% -9.0% 27.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 8.9% -3.2% 9.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 29.8% -4.9% 26.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 10.7% -8.5% 14.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.9% -5.0% 29.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.2% 0.0% 41.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.3% 3.4% 15.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 1.5% 16.6% 53.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.3% 0.5% 16.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFFIVAKAMFTNT
Gross margin 81.9% 57.5% 80.2%
EBITDA margin 27.5% 27.6% 39.4%
Operating margin 24.5% 10.5% 32.4%
Pretax margin 25.8% 11.5% 34.8%
Net margin 22.0% 9.5% 28.2%
FCF margin 29.3% 22.1% 41.4%
Operating cash flow margin 31.7% 33.5% 45.1%
Return on equity 19.4% 8.5% 166.9%
Return on assets 10.9% 3.1% 20.4%
Return on invested capital – – 111.7%
Return on capital employed 16.6% 4.3% 44.2%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 3.5x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 7.6% 11.8% 3.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFFIVAKAMFTNT
Debt / assets – 11.3% 4.6%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.4x -1.2x
Debt / FCF – 1.8x 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 43.5% 68.5% 85.7%
Equity / assets 56.5% 31.5% 14.3%
Interest coverage – 13.7x 135.7x
Current ratio 1.7x 1.6x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.5x 1.5x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.9x 1.2x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 7.16 1.69 10.21

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFFIVAKAMFTNT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.6% -0.8% 2.1%
Shareholder yield 0.6% -0.8% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFFIVAKAMFTNT
Forward P/E 28.4xFY2026 15.6xFY2026 51.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $16.24FY2026 $6.31FY2026 $3.58FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +2.7%FY2026 -11.4%FY2026 +29.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.0% -0.2% +0.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.52BFY2026 $4.28BFY2026 $8.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.8%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026 +23.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.4% +27.3% +13.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFFIVAKAMFTNT
Held by institutions 96.6% 100.0% 68.6%
Institutions holding 831 801 1,567
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.6% +3.5% +23.7%
Institutions buying 483 430 854
Institutions selling 240 282 549
Buyers to sellers 2.01 1.52 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FFIVAKAMFTNT
FFIV 1.00 0.36 0.44
AKAM 0.36 1.00 0.25
FTNT 0.44 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FFIV, AKAM and FTNT?

Fortinet (FTNT) is the largest by market capitalisation: F5 (FFIV) $26.07B, Akamai Technologies (AKAM) $14.30B, Fortinet (FTNT) $135.79B.

Which stock is cheaper, FFIV, AKAM and FTNT?

Akamai Technologies (AKAM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (F5 (FFIV) 35.9x, Akamai Technologies (AKAM) 34.8x, Fortinet (FTNT) 64.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Akamai Technologies (AKAM) is cheapest (F5 (FFIV) 28.4x, Akamai Technologies (AKAM) 15.6x, Fortinet (FTNT) 51.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fortinet (FTNT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: F5 (FFIV) +9.4%, Akamai Technologies (AKAM) +5.9%, Fortinet (FTNT) +18.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortinet (FTNT) has the highest net margin (F5 (FFIV) 22.0%, Akamai Technologies (AKAM) 9.5%, Fortinet (FTNT) 28.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fortinet (FTNT) returned the most: F5 (FFIV) +54.7%, Akamai Technologies (AKAM) +31.2%, Fortinet (FTNT) +114.3%. Over five years, Fortinet (FTNT) compounded fastest (F5 (FFIV) +16.4%/yr, Akamai Technologies (AKAM) -1.1%/yr, Fortinet (FTNT) +23.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, F5 (FFIV) has been the steadiest (F5 (FFIV) 35.1%, Akamai Technologies (AKAM) 61.5%, Fortinet (FTNT) 42.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FFIV, AKAM and FTNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortinet (FTNT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.