FER vs OMAB vs STRL Stock Comparison

Ferrovial, Central North Airport and Sterling Infrastructure Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FER Ferrovial N.V.
$50.35 -9.8% 1M -21.8% 1Y
Market cap
$38.82B
P/E
36.1x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Central North Airport leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Central North Airport 3, Ferrovial 2, Sterling Infrastructure 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFEROMABSTRLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $38.82B $4.78B $11.32B FER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.1x 16.1x 26.2x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 47.1x 15.0x 19.3x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +60.8% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 12.5% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 29.2% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — -0.3x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -21.8% -3.6% -4.8% OMAB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.4%/yr +15.2%/yr +73.7%/yr STRL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.4% 31.2% 85.8% FER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 46/100 71/100 STRL

Percentile Scorecard

FEROMABSTRL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFEROMABSTRL
Valuation 37 #33 of 52 28 #98 of 136 49 #27 of 52
Growth – – 86 #6 of 37
Profitability – – 97 #2 of 37
Financial Health 34 #38 of 57 34 #95 of 144 75 #15 of 57
Shareholder Returns 81 #6 of 27 74 #22 of 82 50 #14 of 27
Overall 51 46 71
  • FER ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • STRL ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFEROMABSTRLSPY
1 month -9.8%-3.9%-29.6% -0.8%
3 months -19.9%-5.5%-43.2% +3.5%
6 months -25.6%-10.9%-28.6% +7.0%
Year to date -22.1%-9.0%+17.8% +12.2%
1 year -21.8%-3.6%-4.8% +13.0%
3 years +54.9%+74.4%+408.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +15.7%+20.4%+72.1% +23.1%
5 years +71.3%+102.8%+1,477.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +11.4%+15.2%+73.7% +11.0%
10 years +137.7%+104.2%+4,609.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +9.0%+7.4%+47.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFEROMABSTRLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.4%31.2%85.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.6%28.1%81.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.021.123.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.86-0.12-0.06 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.3%-42.1%-64.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.3%-26.7%-63.7% -1.8%
52-week high $74.38$134.98$993.74 $779.14
52-week low $48.86$88.75$283.57 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFEROMABSTRL
P/E now vs peer median 36.1xmedian 25.7x 16.1xmedian 16.1x 25.7xmedian 25.7x
P/S now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 0.8x 5.4xmedian 1.0x 3.2xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.9x —median 8.7x 15.7xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.5xmedian 22.5x 11.8xmedian 11.5x 23.0xmedian 22.5x
P/B now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 2.3x 7.5xmedian 1.2x 8.0xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.56 —median 0.81 0.14median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFEROMABSTRL
Revenue – – $3.44B
Gross profit – – $818.59M
Operating income – – $602.35M
Net income – – $460.44M
Free cash flow – – $482.00M
EPS (diluted) – – $13.85
Cash & equivalents $5.02B $172.32M $464.45M
Total debt $12.25B $1.84B $283.88M
Shares (diluted) 718.72M – 31.14M
Enterprise value $17.07B $4.27B $9.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFEROMABSTRL
P/E 36.1x 16.1x 25.7x
P/FCF 18.5x 11.8x 23.0x
P/Operating cash flow – – 18.5x
P/S 3.3x 5.4x 3.2x
P/B 5.2x 7.5x 8.0x
P/Tangible book 5.3x -9.6x 15.2x
EV/EBITDA – – 15.7x
EV/EBIT – – 18.1x
EV/Revenue – – 3.2x
EV/FCF – – 22.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 18.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.14

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFEROMABSTRL
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 60.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 22.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 72.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 39.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 94.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 49.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – – 51.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 55.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – – 49.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 183.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 20.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 18.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 10.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 18.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFEROMABSTRL
Gross margin – – 23.8%
EBITDA margin – – 20.2%
Operating margin – – 17.5%
Pretax margin – – 17.5%
Net margin – – 12.5%
FCF margin – – 14.0%
Operating cash flow margin – – 17.4%
Return on equity – – 35.6%
Return on assets – – 15.4%
Return on invested capital – – 29.2%
Return on capital employed – – 35.5%
Asset turnover – – 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFEROMABSTRL
Debt / assets 38.0% 43.4% 8.9%
Debt / equity 1.8x 1.2x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – -0.3x
Debt / FCF – – 0.6x
Liabilities / assets 78.5% 63.1% 56.5%
Equity / assets 21.5% 36.9% 43.5%
Interest coverage – – 36.1x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.3x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.1x 1.2x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.7x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – – 5.93

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFEROMABSTRL
Dividend yield 2.6% 5.5% –
Net buyback yield – – 0.6%
Shareholder yield 2.6% 5.5% 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFEROMABSTRL
Forward P/E 47.1xFY2026 15.0xFY2026 19.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.07FY2026 $6.60FY2026 $18.73FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -20.7%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026 +72.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.1% +28.5% +43.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.77BFY2026 $933.64MFY2026 $4.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026 +68.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.3% +19.6% +12.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFEROMABSTRL
Held by institutions 33.2% 12.3% 85.7%
Institutions holding 337 163 888
Change in shares held, QoQ +17.5% +5.4% -6.1%
Institutions buying 208 77 456
Institutions selling 103 59 366
Buyers to sellers 2.02 1.31 1.25

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FEROMABSTRL
FER 1.00 0.43 0.44
OMAB 0.43 1.00 0.24
STRL 0.44 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FER, OMAB and STRL?

Ferrovial (FER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ferrovial (FER) $38.82B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.78B, Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) $11.32B.

Which stock is cheaper, FER, OMAB and STRL?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ferrovial (FER) 36.1x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.1x, Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) 26.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Central North Airport (OMAB) is cheapest (Ferrovial (FER) 47.1x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 15.0x, Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) 19.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Central North Airport (OMAB) returned the most: Ferrovial (FER) -21.8%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.6%, Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) -4.8%. Over five years, Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) compounded fastest (Ferrovial (FER) +11.4%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.2%/yr, Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) +73.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrovial (FER) has been the steadiest (Ferrovial (FER) 25.4%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.2%, Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) 85.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FER, OMAB and STRL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Central North Airport (OMAB) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.