FER vs OMAB vs SHO Stock Comparison

Ferrovial, Central North Airport and Sunstone Hotel Investors Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FER Ferrovial N.V.
$54.53 -2.2% 1M -14.6% 1Y
Market cap
$40.99B
P/E
39.1x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Central North Airport leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Central North Airport 3, Sunstone Hotel Investors 3, Ferrovial 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFEROMABSHOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $40.99B $4.94B $2.39B FER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.1x 16.0x 56.7x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 51.0x 14.9x 49.1x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +7.3% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 4.2% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 1.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -14.6% -4.2% +41.1% SHO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.8%/yr +15.2%/yr +0.7%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.3% 31.1% 22.8% SHO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 46/100 73/100 SHO

Percentile Scorecard

FEROMABSHO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFEROMABSHO
Valuation 35 #34 of 52 30 #96 of 136 91 #14 of 145
Growth – – 62 #55 of 142
Profitability – – 64 #49 of 135
Financial Health 34 #38 of 57 35 #94 of 143 91 #13 of 136
Shareholder Returns 72 #8 of 26 75 #21 of 81 59 #54 of 131
Overall 47 46 73
  • FER ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • SHO ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFEROMABSHOSPY
1 month -2.2%-3.6%+13.0% +0.9%
3 months -12.8%-7.6%+8.5% +5.9%
6 months -19.3%-7.4%+29.9% +8.5%
Year to date -15.6%-9.7%+42.8% +13.3%
1 year -14.6%-4.2%+41.1% +12.4%
3 years +67.8%+73.1%+41.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year +18.8%+20.1%+12.2% +23.5%
5 years +74.8%+103.0%+3.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year +11.8%+15.2%+0.7% +11.0%
10 years +157.5%+108.9%+3.0% +263.4%
10 years, per year +9.9%+7.6%+0.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureFEROMABSHOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.3%31.1%22.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.6%28.0%23.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.041.120.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.56-0.141.80 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.3%-42.1%-41.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.7%-27.2%0.0% -0.9%
52-week high $74.38$134.98$12.77 $779.14
52-week low $48.86$88.75$8.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFEROMABSHO
P/E now vs peer median 39.1xmedian 27.7x 16.0xmedian 16.1x 56.0xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 0.8x 5.3xmedian 0.9x 2.4xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.4x —median 8.6x 7.7xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.0xmedian 23.7x 11.7xmedian 11.6x 24.5xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 2.5x 7.5xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.57 —median 0.80 -2.98median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFEROMABSHO
Revenue – – $1.00B
Gross profit – – $608.66M
Operating income – – $262.94M
Net income – – $53.12M
Free cash flow – – $96.80M
EPS (diluted) – – $0.23
Cash & equivalents $5.02B $172.32M $203.71M
Total debt $12.25B $746.90M $968.37M
Shares (diluted) 718.72M – 185.55M
Enterprise value $19.24B $4.42B $1.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFEROMABSHO
P/E 39.1x 16.0x 56.0x
P/FCF 20.0x 11.7x 24.5x
P/Operating cash flow – – 12.0x
P/S 3.6x 5.3x 2.4x
P/B 5.7x 7.5x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 5.8x -9.6x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA – – 7.7x
EV/EBIT – – 11.9x
EV/Revenue – – 3.1x
EV/FCF – – 32.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 15.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -2.98

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFEROMABSHO
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 7.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -0.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 7.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -1.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 8.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 45.3%
Net income growth (1Y) – – 164.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -19.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – – 917.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -18.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 18.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -4.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 318.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -4.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFEROMABSHO
Gross margin – – 60.7%
EBITDA margin – – 40.4%
Operating margin – – 26.2%
Pretax margin – – 5.3%
Net margin – – 4.2%
FCF margin – – 9.7%
Operating cash flow margin – – 19.8%
Return on equity – – 2.8%
Return on assets – – 1.8%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 3.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFEROMABSHO
Debt / assets 38.0% 43.4% 31.9%
Debt / equity 1.8x 1.2x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 1.9x
Debt / FCF – – 10.0x
Liabilities / assets 78.5% 63.1% 38.0%
Equity / assets 21.5% 36.9% 62.0%
Interest coverage – – 5.2x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.3x –
Quick ratio 1.1x 1.2x –
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFEROMABSHO
Dividend yield 1.4% 5.5% 2.8%
Net buyback yield – – 3.1%
Shareholder yield 1.4% 5.5% 5.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFEROMABSHO
Forward P/E 51.0xFY2026 14.9xFY2026 49.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.07FY2026 $6.60FY2026 $0.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -20.7%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026 +550.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.1% +28.5% -11.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.77BFY2026 $933.64MFY2026 $966.48MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026 +0.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.3% +19.6% -7.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFEROMABSHO
Held by institutions 33.2% 12.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 337 163 273
Change in shares held, QoQ +17.5% +5.4% +2.6%
Institutions buying 208 77 136
Institutions selling 103 59 97
Buyers to sellers 2.02 1.31 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FEROMABSHO
FER 1.00 0.41 0.28
OMAB 0.41 1.00 0.21
SHO 0.28 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FER, OMAB and SHO?

Ferrovial (FER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ferrovial (FER) $40.99B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.94B, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) $2.39B.

Which stock is cheaper, FER, OMAB and SHO?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ferrovial (FER) 39.1x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.0x, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 56.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Central North Airport (OMAB) is cheapest (Ferrovial (FER) 51.0x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 14.9x, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 49.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) returned the most: Ferrovial (FER) -14.6%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -4.2%, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) +41.1%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Ferrovial (FER) +11.8%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.2%/yr, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) +0.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) has been the steadiest (Ferrovial (FER) 26.3%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 22.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FER, OMAB and SHO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Central North Airport (OMAB) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.