FER vs OMAB vs GVA Stock Comparison

Ferrovial, Central North Airport and Granite Construction Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FER Ferrovial N.V.
$49.65 -10.2% 1M -21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$36.19B
P/E
35.6x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
2 wins
GVA Granite Construction Inc
$106.52 -5.4% 1M +3.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.73B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.97B
Div. yield
0.00%
Engineering and Construction Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Granite Construction leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Granite Construction 3, Ferrovial 2, Central North Airport 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFEROMABGVALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $36.19B $4.78B $4.73B FER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.6x 16.0x -28.7x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 45.6x 14.6x — OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +21.8% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — -3.3% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 13.4% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 1.3x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -21.9% -3.8% +3.0% GVA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.1%/yr +14.6%/yr +21.9%/yr GVA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.3% 31.1% 33.0% FER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 44/100 55/100 GVA

Percentile Scorecard

FEROMABGVA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFEROMABGVA
Valuation 37 #33 of 52 28 #98 of 136 82 #10 of 52
Growth – – 50 #19 of 37
Profitability – – 50 #19 of 37
Financial Health 34 #38 of 57 34 #97 of 147 32 #39 of 57
Shareholder Returns 89 #4 of 27 70 #26 of 84 62 #11 of 27
Overall 53 44 55
  • FER ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • GVA ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFEROMABGVASPY
1 month -10.2%-2.7%-5.4% -1.0%
3 months -21.5%-4.7%-14.4% +2.9%
6 months -28.1%-15.4%-13.7% +6.4%
Year to date -23.2%-9.4%-7.7% +11.4%
1 year -21.9%-3.8%+3.0% +13.1%
3 years +52.8%+53.7%+206.7% +79.4%
3 years, per year +15.2%+15.4%+45.3% +21.5%
5 years +68.9%+97.2%+168.8% +67.7%
5 years, per year +11.1%+14.6%+21.9% +10.9%
10 years +134.4%+101.2%+144.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year +8.9%+7.2%+9.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureFEROMABGVASPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.3%31.1%33.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.6%28.0%33.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.011.110.95 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.86-0.120.09 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.3%-42.1%-40.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.2%-27.0%-33.6% -2.5%
52-week high $74.38$134.98$160.39 $779.14
52-week low $48.86$88.75$98.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFEROMABGVA
P/E now vs peer median 35.6xmedian 25.6x 16.0xmedian 16.0x -28.3xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 0.8x 5.4xmedian 1.0x 0.9xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.7x —median 8.7x 10.5xmedian 12.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.2xmedian 22.4x 11.8xmedian 11.5x 9.9xmedian 22.4x
P/B now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 2.3x 7.5xmedian 1.2x 5.8xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.57 —median 0.82 0.38median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFEROMABGVA
Revenue – – $4.97B
Gross profit – – $776.94M
Operating income – – $314.31M
Net income – – -$151.53M
Free cash flow – – $471.91M
EPS (diluted) – – $-3.77
Cash & equivalents $5.02B $172.32M $877.12M
Total debt $12.25B $1.84B $1.56B
Shares (diluted) 718.72M – 43.75M
Enterprise value $14.44B $4.26B $2.36B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFEROMABGVA
P/E 35.6x 16.0x -28.3x
P/FCF 18.2x 11.8x 9.9x
P/Operating cash flow – – 7.7x
P/S 3.3x 5.4x 0.9x
P/B 5.2x 7.5x 5.8x
P/Tangible book 5.3x -9.6x 7.9x
EV/EBITDA – – 10.5x
EV/EBIT – – 16.9x
EV/Revenue – – 1.1x
EV/FCF – – 11.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 8.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFEROMABGVA
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 21.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 15.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 22.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 30.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 37.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 76.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – – -185.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -85.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – – -225.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -73.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 37.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 147.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 52.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 94.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFEROMABGVA
Gross margin – – 15.6%
EBITDA margin – – 10.2%
Operating margin – – 6.3%
Pretax margin – – -1.3%
Net margin – – -3.3%
FCF margin – – 9.5%
Operating cash flow margin – – 12.2%
Return on equity – – -14.8%
Return on assets – – -3.3%
Return on invested capital – – 13.4%
Return on capital employed – – 16.9%
Asset turnover – – 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – -4.0x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFEROMABGVA
Debt / assets 38.0% 43.4% 32.6%
Debt / equity 1.8x 1.2x 1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 1.3x
Debt / FCF – – 3.3x
Liabilities / assets 78.5% 63.1% 83.1%
Equity / assets 21.5% 36.9% 16.9%
Interest coverage – – 4.5x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.3x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.1x 1.2x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.7x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – – 2.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFEROMABGVA
Dividend yield 3.7% 5.5% 0.5%
Net buyback yield – – 1.1%
Shareholder yield 3.7% 5.5% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – -15.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 4.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -0.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFEROMABGVA
Forward P/E 45.6xFY2026 14.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.09FY2026 $6.73FY2026 $-3.74FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -19.3%FY2026 +5.3%FY2026 -196.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +11.0% +29.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.80BFY2026 $942.26MFY2026 $5.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.3%FY2026 +2.0%FY2026 +15.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.3% +20.7% +12.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFEROMABGVA
Held by institutions 33.2% 12.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 337 163 445
Change in shares held, QoQ +17.5% +5.4% -3.0%
Institutions buying 208 77 239
Institutions selling 103 59 151
Buyers to sellers 2.02 1.31 1.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FEROMABGVA
FER 1.00 0.43 0.39
OMAB 0.43 1.00 0.23
GVA 0.39 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FER, OMAB and GVA?

Ferrovial (FER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ferrovial (FER) $36.19B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.78B, Granite Construction (GVA) $4.73B.

Which stock is cheaper, FER, OMAB and GVA?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ferrovial (FER) 35.6x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.0x, Granite Construction (GVA) -28.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Central North Airport (OMAB) is cheapest (Ferrovial (FER) 45.6x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 14.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Granite Construction (GVA) returned the most: Ferrovial (FER) -21.9%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.8%, Granite Construction (GVA) +3.0%. Over five years, Granite Construction (GVA) compounded fastest (Ferrovial (FER) +11.1%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +14.6%/yr, Granite Construction (GVA) +21.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ferrovial (FER) 0.00%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 0.00%, Granite Construction (GVA) 0.00%. Ferrovial (FER) and Central North Airport (OMAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrovial (FER) has been the steadiest (Ferrovial (FER) 25.3%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%, Granite Construction (GVA) 33.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FER, OMAB and GVA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Granite Construction (GVA) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.