FENG vs NFLX vs KLTR Stock Comparison

Phoenix New Media, Netflix and Kaltura Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FENG Phoenix New Media Ltd
$1.38 -2.8% 1M -43.2% 1Y
Market cap
$16.60M
P/E
5.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$118.50M
Div. yield
–
Streaming Technology
4 wins
NFLX Netflix Inc
$63.90 -10.2% 1M -41.6% 1Y
Market cap
$258.48B
P/E
17.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$49.73B
Div. yield
–
Streaming Technology
5 wins
KLTR Kaltura Inc
$1.40 +6.1% 1M -13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$218.27M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$180.93M
Div. yield
–
Streaming Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Netflix leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Netflix 5, Phoenix New Media 4, Kaltura 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFENGNFLXKLTRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.60M $258.48B $218.27M NFLX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 5.7x 17.5x -17.4x FENG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.4x 18.6x 140.0x FENG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.9% +14.7% -0.2% FENG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.5% 29.7% -6.9% NFLX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 29.2% -8.6% NFLX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.2x -0.4x KLTR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -43.2% -41.6% -13.0% KLTR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -31.0%/yr -0.7%/yr -31.8%/yr NFLX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.8% 36.4% 69.3% NFLX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 77/100 67/100 45/100 FENG

Percentile Scorecard

FENGNFLXKLTR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFENGNFLXKLTR
Valuation 99 #3 of 167 44 #94 of 167 47 #89 of 167
Growth 92 #13 of 153 78 #35 of 153 55 #70 of 153
Profitability 43 #88 of 153 97 #6 of 153 36 #99 of 153
Financial Health 75 #45 of 179 53 #84 of 179 18 #147 of 179
Shareholder Returns – 63 #35 of 94 71 #28 of 94
Overall 77 67 45
  • FENG ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • NFLX ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • KLTR ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFENGNFLXKLTRSPY
1 month -2.8%-10.2%+6.1% -0.8%
3 months -4.8%-9.2%-4.1% +3.5%
6 months -20.2%-30.1%-4.1% +7.0%
Year to date -17.4%-31.8%-14.6% +12.2%
1 year -43.2%-41.6%-13.0% +13.0%
3 years +7.8%+60.6%-14.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +2.5%+17.1%-5.1% +23.1%
5 years -84.4%-3.6%-85.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -31.0%-0.7%-31.8% +11.0%
10 years -93.6%+403.1%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -24.1%+17.5%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFENGNFLXKLTRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.8%36.4%69.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.1%37.2%64.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.100.210.85 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.17-1.14-0.19 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -88.4%-75.9%-91.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -43.0%-44.8%-25.9% -1.8%
52-week high $2.42$115.75$1.89 $779.14
52-week low $1.38$63.90$1.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFENGNFLXKLTR
P/E now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 17.5x 17.9xmedian 17.5x -16.5xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 1.4x 5.3xmedian 1.4x 1.2xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.5x 8.0xmedian 14.5x 16.4xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 12.1x 23.1xmedian 12.1x 18.9xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 1.7x 9.0xmedian 1.7x 125.6xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.12median 0.41 0.35median 0.41 -0.39median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFENGNFLXKLTR
Revenue $118.50M $49.73B $180.93M
Gross profit $63.62M $25.21B $130.36M
Operating income -$3.49M $15.56B -$2.63M
Net income $4.10M $14.77B -$12.52M
Free cash flow – $11.38B $11.21M
R&D $8.68M $3.89B $45.78M
EPS (diluted) $0.24 $3.52 $-0.08
Cash & equivalents $74.01M $8.19B $25.97M
Total debt – $58.27B $26.69M
Shares (diluted) 12.01M 4.20B 147.58M
Enterprise value -$549.10M $219.78B $1.09M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFENGNFLXKLTR
P/E 5.7x 17.9x -16.5x
P/FCF – 23.1x 18.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 21.3x 18.3x
P/S 0.1x 5.3x 1.2x
P/B 0.1x 9.0x 125.6x
P/Tangible book 0.1x 9.0x -25.8x
EV/EBITDA – 8.0x 16.4x
EV/EBIT 36.8x 17.3x -79.1x
EV/Revenue -1.1x 5.4x 1.1x
EV/FCF – 23.7x 18.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 21.9x 17.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.12 0.35 -0.39

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFENGNFLXKLTR
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.9% 14.7% -0.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.4% 15.0% 1.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 46.1% 20.9% 3.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 23.0% 24.9% 5.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 61.0% 23.1% 79.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 38.1% 37.3% 62.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 144.5% 41.6% 34.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 58.0% 48.3% 39.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 135.2% 46.5% 31.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 46.7% 51.8% 42.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 28.5% -29.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 26.7% 39.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 26.9% -29.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 26.1% 37.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFENGNFLXKLTR
Gross margin 53.7% 50.7% 72.0%
EBITDA margin – 67.3% 7.0%
Operating margin -2.9% 31.3% -1.5%
Pretax margin 4.1% 35.6% -3.5%
Net margin 2.5% 29.7% -6.9%
FCF margin – 22.9% 6.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 24.7% 6.4%
Return on equity 2.6% 49.7% -395.1%
Return on assets 1.8% 25.2% -7.6%
Return on invested capital – 29.2% -8.6%
Return on capital employed -2.1% 33.6% -8.8%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x -0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% 8.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFENGNFLXKLTR
Debt / assets – 25.8% 15.8%
Debt / equity – 0.5x 15.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.2x -0.4x
Debt / FCF – 1.3x 2.4x
Liabilities / assets 32.0% 50.1% 99.0%
Equity / assets 68.0% 49.9% 1.0%
Interest coverage – 18.2x –
Current ratio 2.9x 1.1x 0.6x
Quick ratio 2.8x 0.7x 0.4x
Cash ratio 2.1x 0.7x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 0.75 8.40 -2.70

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFENGNFLXKLTR
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 4.8% 7.6%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.8% 7.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFENGNFLXKLTR
Forward P/E 1.4xFY2023 18.6xFY2026 140.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.98FY2023 $3.43FY2026 $0.01FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +35.6%FY2026 -85.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -345.9% +6.1% +400.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $194.02MFY2023 $54.15BFY2026 $196.78MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +19.8%FY2026 +8.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -24.3% +10.7% +2.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFENGNFLXKLTR
Held by institutions 1.5% 80.9% 28.5%
Institutions holding 6 3,358 101
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.1% +2.2% +6.2%
Institutions buying 1 1,691 64
Institutions selling 3 1,365 19
Buyers to sellers 0.33 1.24 3.37

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FENGNFLXKLTR
FENG 1.00 -0.01 -0.10
NFLX -0.01 1.00 0.09
KLTR -0.10 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FENG, NFLX and KLTR?

Netflix (NFLX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Phoenix New Media (FENG) $16.60M, Netflix (NFLX) $258.48B, Kaltura (KLTR) $218.27M.

Which stock is cheaper, FENG, NFLX and KLTR?

Phoenix New Media (FENG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Phoenix New Media (FENG) 5.7x, Netflix (NFLX) 17.5x, Kaltura (KLTR) -17.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Phoenix New Media (FENG) is cheapest (Phoenix New Media (FENG) 1.4x, Netflix (NFLX) 18.6x, Kaltura (KLTR) 140.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Phoenix New Media (FENG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Phoenix New Media (FENG) +17.9%, Netflix (NFLX) +14.7%, Kaltura (KLTR) -0.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Netflix (NFLX) has the highest net margin (Phoenix New Media (FENG) 2.5%, Netflix (NFLX) 29.7%, Kaltura (KLTR) -6.9%). On return on invested capital, Netflix (NFLX) leads (Netflix (NFLX) 29.2%, Kaltura (KLTR) -8.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kaltura (KLTR) returned the most: Phoenix New Media (FENG) -43.2%, Netflix (NFLX) -41.6%, Kaltura (KLTR) -13.0%. Over five years, Netflix (NFLX) compounded fastest (Phoenix New Media (FENG) -31.0%/yr, Netflix (NFLX) -0.7%/yr, Kaltura (KLTR) -31.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Netflix (NFLX) has been the steadiest (Phoenix New Media (FENG) 36.8%, Netflix (NFLX) 36.4%, Kaltura (KLTR) 69.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FENG, NFLX and KLTR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Netflix (NFLX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.