FENC vs NTRB vs PMHS Stock Comparison

Fennec Pharmaceuticals, NutriBand and Polomar Health Services Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NTRB NutriBand Inc.
$5.97 -25.4% 1M -16.5% 1Y
Market cap
$72.45M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62M
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Fennec Pharmaceuticals leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Fennec Pharmaceuticals 5, NutriBand 2, Polomar Health Services 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFENCNTRBPMHSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $358.92M $72.45M $3.68M FENC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -54.3x -10.4x -0.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.0x 3.6x — NTRB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +61.4% -37.3% +7,688.8% PMHS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -12.3% -430.4% -301.1% FENC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.5x -7.2x PMHS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.9% -16.5% -35.0% FENC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.3%/yr +3.7%/yr -73.8%/yr NTRB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 64.1% 80.1% 418.8% FENC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 50/100 53/100 FENC

Percentile Scorecard

FENCNTRBPMHS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFENCNTRBPMHS
Valuation 59 #255 of 626 53 #295 of 626 85 #92 of 626
Growth 93 #43 of 604 43 #346 of 604 60 #241 of 604
Profitability 84 #88 of 555 35 #360 of 555 61 #215 of 555
Financial Health 57 #285 of 658 68 #210 of 658 3 #637 of 658
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 73 50 53
  • FENC ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • NTRB ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • PMHS ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFENCNTRBPMHSSPY
1 month -4.2%-25.4%-7.1% -0.8%
3 months -0.6%+100.3%+62.5% +3.5%
6 months +48.2%+53.5%+8.3% +7.0%
Year to date +31.8%+31.5%-83.8% +12.2%
1 year +12.9%-16.5%-35.0% +13.0%
3 years +48.4%+182.9%-90.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +14.1%+41.5%-53.6% +23.1%
5 years +12.2%+20.1%-99.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year +2.3%+3.7%-73.8% +11.0%
10 years +415.2%—-96.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +17.8%—-29.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFENCNTRBPMHSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 64.1%80.1%418.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.6%75.6%917.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.321.030.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.20-0.21-0.08 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.6%-77.7%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.6%-33.6%-83.8% -1.8%
52-week high $12.78$8.99$0.80 $779.14
52-week low $5.77$2.81$0.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFENCNTRBPMHS
P/E now vs peer median -53.1xmedian 17.1x -10.4xmedian 17.1x -0.4xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 8.8x 44.9xmedian 8.8x 1.2xmedian 8.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.1x -10.0xmedian 17.1x -49.9xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.0x -20.0xmedian 18.0x -528.5xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 2.1x 13.6xmedian 2.1x -3.5xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median -1.25median 0.31 -12.69median 0.31 —median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFENCNTRBPMHS
Revenue $53.77M $1.62M $3.17M
Gross profit $49.65M $536.12K $1.94M
Operating income -$3.74M -$7.05M -$9.36M
Net income -$6.60M -$6.96M -$9.46M
Free cash flow – -$3.63M -$6.96K
R&D $274.00K $1.21M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.18 $-0.57 $-0.34
Cash & equivalents $41.25M $3.42M $178.87K
Total debt – $647.66K $3.73M
Shares (diluted) 36.43M 12.16M 28.06M
Enterprise value $240.23M $55.13M $3.24M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFENCNTRBPMHS
P/E -53.1x -10.4x -0.4x
P/FCF – -20.0x -528.5x
P/Operating cash flow – -20.0x -528.5x
P/S 6.6x 44.9x 1.2x
P/B 8.4x 13.6x -3.5x
P/Tangible book 8.4x 14.1x -3.5x
EV/EBITDA – -10.0x -49.9x
EV/EBIT -84.1x -9.8x -0.5x
EV/Revenue 5.8x 42.8x 1.4x
EV/FCF – -19.1x -617.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – -19.1x -617.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.25 -12.69 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFENCNTRBPMHS
Revenue growth (1Y) 61.4% -37.3% 7,689%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 118.1% -10.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 65.9% -39.5% 7,674%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -16.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 61.4% 32.3% -385.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 46.2% -15.3% -200.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.1% 32.2% -361.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 37.0% -14.8% -201.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 58.3% 80.0% -358.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 42.6% 0.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 25.9% 99.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -5.7% 67.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 26.6% 99.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -5.5% 67.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFENCNTRBPMHS
Gross margin 92.4% 33.1% 61.1%
EBITDA margin – -426.5% -2.7%
Operating margin -7.0% -435.6% -295.0%
Pretax margin -8.2% -430.4% -298.3%
Net margin -12.3% -430.4% -301.1%
FCF margin – -224.5% -0.2%
Operating cash flow margin – -224.5% -0.2%
Return on equity -11.4% -123.0% –
Return on assets -6.1% -105.6% -1,422%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -6.2% -123.9% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.2x 4.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.5x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 14.8% 204.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFENCNTRBPMHS
Debt / assets – 2.4% 97.6%
Debt / equity – 0.0x -0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.5x -7.2x
Debt / FCF – 0.0x -114.3x
Liabilities / assets 44.0% 15.3% 229.7%
Equity / assets 56.0% 84.7% -129.7%
Interest coverage -2.5x -339.3x -90.3x
Current ratio 5.8x 4.2x –
Quick ratio 5.2x 3.8x –
Cash ratio 3.3x 3.8x –
Altman Z-score 3.70 31.41 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFENCNTRBPMHS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFENCNTRBPMHS
Forward P/E 35.0xFY2026 3.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.29FY2026 $1.65FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +241.4% +112.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $75.58MFY2026 $90.32MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +69.3%FY2026 +4,334.5%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +28.3% +109.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFENCNTRBPMHS
Held by institutions 46.6% – –
Institutions holding 107 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% – –
Institutions buying 71 – –
Institutions selling 19 – –
Buyers to sellers 3.74 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FENCNTRBPMHS
FENC 1.00 0.07 -0.13
NTRB 0.07 1.00 0.11
PMHS -0.13 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FENC, NTRB and PMHS?

Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) $358.92M, NutriBand (NTRB) $72.45M, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) $3.68M.

Which company is growing faster?

Polomar Health Services (PMHS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) +61.4%, NutriBand (NTRB) -37.3%, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) +7,688.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) has the highest net margin (Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) -12.3%, NutriBand (NTRB) -430.4%, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) -301.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) returned the most: Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) +12.9%, NutriBand (NTRB) -16.5%, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) -35.0%. Over five years, NutriBand (NTRB) compounded fastest (Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) +2.3%/yr, NutriBand (NTRB) +3.7%/yr, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) -73.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) has been the steadiest (Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) 64.1%, NutriBand (NTRB) 80.1%, Polomar Health Services (PMHS) 418.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FENC, NTRB and PMHS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.