FEBO vs TTC vs WHR Stock Comparison

Fenbo Holdings, Toro and Whirlpool Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FEBO Fenbo Holdings Ltd
$0.67 -2.9% 1M -16.3% 1Y
Market cap
$7.41M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
TTC Toro Co
$104.61 +7.8% 1M +40.4% 1Y
Market cap
$9.95B
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.75B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
10 wins
WHR Whirlpool Corp /De/
$27.44 -13.4% 1M -62.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.77B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$14.57B
Div. yield
–
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Toro leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (Toro 10). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFEBOTTCWHRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.41M $9.95B $1.77B TTC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 27.4x -11.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 22.1x 23.1x TTC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +5.2% -6.4% TTC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 7.6% -1.0% TTC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 16.4% 0.4% TTC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.2x 7.1x TTC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.3% +40.4% -62.8% TTC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +1.9%/yr -33.5%/yr TTC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 90.5% 25.7% 51.7% TTC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 57/100 37/100 TTC

Percentile Scorecard

FEBOTTCWHR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFEBOTTCWHR
Valuation – 54 #94 of 203 71 #13 of 42
Growth – 53 #89 of 188 24 #32 of 42
Profitability – 92 #16 of 183 39 #25 of 40
Financial Health 56 #20 of 44 38 #134 of 217 16 #37 of 44
Shareholder Returns – 49 #78 of 153 33 #19 of 28
Overall – 57 37
  • FEBO ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • TTC ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • WHR ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFEBOTTCWHRSPY
1 month -2.9%+7.8%-13.4% -0.2%
3 months -18.3%+9.7%-28.8% +3.9%
6 months -43.0%+10.4%-50.3% +8.2%
Year to date -49.6%+32.9%-62.0% +12.9%
1 year -16.3%+40.4%-62.8% +12.3%
3 years —+28.7%-73.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+8.8%-35.5% +23.3%
5 years —+9.9%-86.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+1.9%-33.5% +10.9%
10 years —+122.1%-81.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+8.3%-15.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFEBOTTCWHRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 90.5%25.7%51.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 95.0%23.8%53.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.530.391.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.181.57-1.21 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.2%-45.3%-89.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -52.1%-0.8%-70.4% -1.2%
52-week high $1.40$105.42$92.82 $779.14
52-week low $0.63$67.99$26.44 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFEBOTTCWHR
P/E now vs peer median —median 16.0x 27.4xmedian 25.2x -11.9xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.6x 2.1xmedian 1.9x 0.1xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.8x 16.8xmedian 14.0x 9.3xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.9x 13.9xmedian 21.7x -19.7xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.2x 7.4xmedian 2.3x 0.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.64 16.25median 1.32 -0.21median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFEBOTTCWHR
Revenue – $4.75B $14.57B
Gross profit – $1.59B $1.91B
Operating income – $489.80M $428.00M
Net income – $363.30M -$120.00M
Free cash flow – $711.50M -$92.00M
EPS (diluted) – $3.80 $-2.31
Cash & equivalents $2.09M $175.30M $1.10B
Total debt $4.85M $962.00M $6.85B
Shares (diluted) 11.06M 95.60M 65.50M
Enterprise value -$4.27M $9.07B -$1.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFEBOTTCWHR
P/E – 27.4x -11.9x
P/FCF – 13.9x -19.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 12.5x 5.8x
P/S – 2.1x 0.1x
P/B 1.9x 7.4x 0.5x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 11.0x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA – 16.8x 9.3x
EV/EBIT – 21.8x 17.7x
EV/Revenue – 2.2x 0.5x
EV/FCF – 15.0x -82.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – 13.5x 24.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 16.25 -0.21

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFEBOTTCWHR
Revenue growth (1Y) – 5.2% -6.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 0.1% -8.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 5.6% -23.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -1.2% -14.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 14.9% -6.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 0.2% 36.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – 9.1% 32.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -1.2% 58.0%
EPS growth (1Y) – 13.0% 28.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 1.7% 57.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 34.0% -28.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 38.5% -25.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 44.6% -248.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 79.1% -35.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFEBOTTCWHR
Gross margin – 33.4% 13.1%
EBITDA margin – 13.4% 5.6%
Operating margin – 10.3% 2.9%
Pretax margin – 9.7% 0.5%
Net margin – 7.6% -1.0%
FCF margin – 15.0% -0.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 16.6% 2.1%
Return on equity – 26.9% -3.1%
Return on assets – 10.0% -0.7%
Return on invested capital – 16.4% 0.4%
Return on capital employed – 19.1% 3.5%
Asset turnover – 1.3x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.2x -2.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFEBOTTCWHR
Debt / assets 15.2% 27.2% 40.4%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.7x 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.2x 7.1x
Debt / FCF – 1.4x -74.5x
Liabilities / assets 54.8% 62.2% 78.0%
Equity / assets 45.2% 37.8% 22.0%
Interest coverage – 8.7x 1.3x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.6x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.6x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 5.25 1.16

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFEBOTTCWHR
Dividend yield – 1.5% 6.6%
Net buyback yield – 3.2% -59.7%
Shareholder yield – 4.7% -53.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 21.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -0.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFEBOTTCWHR
Forward P/E – 22.1xFY2026 23.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.73FY2026 $1.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +12.6%FY2026 -80.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +16.3% +128.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $4.56BFY2026 $14.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.1%FY2026 -9.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.0% +3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFEBOTTCWHR
Held by institutions – 92.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 590 458
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.1% +2.9%
Institutions buying – 295 250
Institutions selling – 194 130
Buyers to sellers – 1.52 1.92

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FEBOTTCWHR
FEBO 1.00 0.10 0.02
TTC 0.10 1.00 0.30
WHR 0.02 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FEBO, TTC and WHR?

Toro (TTC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) $7.41M, Toro (TTC) $9.95B, Whirlpool (WHR) $1.77B.

Which company is growing faster?

Toro (TTC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Toro (TTC) +5.2%, Whirlpool (WHR) -6.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Toro (TTC) has the highest net margin (Toro (TTC) 7.6%, Whirlpool (WHR) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, Toro (TTC) leads (Toro (TTC) 16.4%, Whirlpool (WHR) 0.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Toro (TTC) returned the most: Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) -16.3%, Toro (TTC) +40.4%, Whirlpool (WHR) -62.8%. Over five years, Toro (TTC) compounded fastest (Toro (TTC) +1.9%/yr, Whirlpool (WHR) -33.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) 0.00%, Toro (TTC) 0.02%, Whirlpool (WHR) 0.00%. Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) and Whirlpool (WHR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Toro (TTC) has been the steadiest (Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) 90.5%, Toro (TTC) 25.7%, Whirlpool (WHR) 51.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FEBO, TTC and WHR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Toro (TTC) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.