FEBO vs MAT Stock Comparison

Fenbo Holdings and Mattel Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FEBO Fenbo Holdings Ltd
$0.67 -2.9% 1M -16.3% 1Y
Market cap
$7.41M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
1 win
MAT Mattel Inc /De/
$15.43 +16.1% 1M -19.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.41B
P/E
10.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.49B
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Mattel leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Mattel 2, Fenbo Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFEBOMATLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.41M $4.41B MAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 10.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.7x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +2.9% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 7.8% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 8.3% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.0x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.3% -19.0% FEBO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -6.3%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 90.5% 44.9% MAT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 63/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

FEBOMAT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFEBOMAT
Valuation – 70 #11 of 34
Growth – 32 #22 of 32
Profitability – 81 #7 of 32
Financial Health 56 #20 of 44 34 #22 of 33
Shareholder Returns – 100 #1 of 18
Overall – 63
  • FEBO ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • MAT ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFEBOMATSPY
1 month -2.9%+16.1% -0.2%
3 months -18.3%-0.1% +3.9%
6 months -43.0%+4.3% +8.2%
Year to date -49.6%-22.2% +12.9%
1 year -16.3%-19.0% +12.3%
3 years —-16.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year —-5.8% +23.3%
5 years —-27.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-6.3% +10.9%
10 years —-50.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-6.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFEBOMATSPY
Volatility, 1Y 90.5%44.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 95.0%50.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.530.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.18-0.42 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.2%-53.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -52.1%-30.4% -1.2%
52-week high $1.40$22.16 $779.14
52-week low $0.63$12.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFEBOMAT
P/E now vs peer median —median 16.0x 10.4xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.6x 0.8xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.8x 10.3xmedian 9.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.9x 8.6xmedian 10.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.2x 2.2xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.64 0.32median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFEBOMAT
Revenue – $5.49B
Gross profit – $2.61B
Operating income – $429.10M
Net income – $427.37M
Free cash flow – $512.60M
EPS (diluted) – $1.48
Cash & equivalents $2.09M $523.86M
Total debt $4.85M $2.33B
Shares (diluted) 11.06M 288.93M
Enterprise value -$4.27M $1.08B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFEBOMAT
P/E – 10.4x
P/FCF – 8.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 6.6x
P/S – 0.8x
P/B 1.9x 2.2x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 2.9x
EV/EBITDA – 10.3x
EV/EBIT – 14.5x
EV/Revenue – 1.1x
EV/FCF – 12.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 9.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.32

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFEBOMAT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 2.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -4.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 4.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -36.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 0.9%
Net income growth (1Y) – -18.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 23.5%
EPS growth (1Y) – -8.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 32.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -10.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 7.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -13.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFEBOMAT
Gross margin – 47.5%
EBITDA margin – 11.0%
Operating margin – 7.8%
Pretax margin – 8.8%
Net margin – 7.8%
FCF margin – 9.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 12.1%
Return on equity – 20.0%
Return on assets – 6.5%
Return on invested capital – 8.3%
Return on capital employed – 8.5%
Asset turnover – 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFEBOMAT
Debt / assets 15.2% 36.7%
Debt / equity 0.3x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.0x
Debt / FCF – 4.6x
Liabilities / assets 54.8% 68.6%
Equity / assets 45.2% 31.4%
Interest coverage – 3.5x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.9x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 2.80

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFEBOMAT
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – 15.5%
Shareholder yield – 15.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFEBOMAT
Forward P/E – 11.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.32FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -6.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $6.04BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +12.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -5.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFEBOMAT
Held by institutions – 100.0%
Institutions holding – 405
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.8%
Institutions buying – 151
Institutions selling – 169
Buyers to sellers – 0.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FEBOMAT
FEBO 1.00 -0.01
MAT -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FEBO and MAT?

Mattel (MAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) $7.41M, Mattel (MAT) $4.41B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) returned the most: Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) -16.3%, Mattel (MAT) -19.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mattel (MAT) has been the steadiest (Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) 90.5%, Mattel (MAT) 44.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do FEBO and MAT move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of -0.01, a negative relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, FEBO and MAT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mattel (MAT) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.