FEBO vs GFF vs KDP Stock Comparison

Fenbo Holdings, Griffon and Keurig Dr Pepper Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FEBO Fenbo Holdings Ltd
$0.78 +13.0% 1M +1.3% 1Y
Market cap
$7.75M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
GFF Griffon Corp
$97.67 -0.7% 1M +27.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.41B
P/E
24.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.75B
Div. yield
0.01%
Building Products Industrials
5 wins
KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
$34.99 +9.5% 1M +28.8% 1Y
Market cap
$47.46B
P/E
33.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.09B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Keurig Dr Pepper leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Keurig Dr Pepper 6, Griffon 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFEBOGFFKDPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.75M $4.41B $47.46B KDP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 24.7x 33.3x GFF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 19.3x 14.8x KDP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +26.9% +27.5% KDP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 6.5% 7.1% KDP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 19.0% 4.3% GFF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.2x 6.7x GFF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.3% +27.8% +28.8% KDP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +30.6%/yr +0.5%/yr GFF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 89.4% 36.0% 26.5% KDP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 61/100 40/100 GFF

Percentile Scorecard

FEBOGFFKDP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFEBOGFFKDP
Valuation – 58 #24 of 56 49 #20 of 38
Growth – 82 #10 of 52 50 #17 of 33
Profitability – 84 #9 of 51 67 #11 of 31
Financial Health 55 #20 of 43 30 #41 of 58 16 #32 of 38
Shareholder Returns – 53 #20 of 41 18 #19 of 23
Overall – 61 40
  • FEBO ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • GFF ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products
  • KDP ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFEBOGFFKDPSPY
1 month +13.0%-0.7%+9.5% -0.8%
3 months +4.0%+4.8%+16.2% +3.5%
6 months -30.4%+3.5%+24.3% +7.0%
Year to date -41.4%+32.6%+24.9% +12.2%
1 year +1.3%+27.8%+28.8% +13.0%
3 years —+146.7%+17.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+35.1%+5.4% +23.1%
5 years —+280.0%+2.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+30.6%+0.5% +11.0%
10 years —+484.9%-60.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+19.3%-8.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFEBOGFFKDPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 89.4%36.0%26.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 92.6%32.7%25.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.591.330.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.010.771.09 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.2%-39.3%-36.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.3%-8.9%-0.6% -1.8%
52-week high $1.40$107.22$35.19 $779.14
52-week low $0.63$66.79$25.31 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFEBOGFFKDP
P/E now vs peer median —median 16.1x 24.0xmedian 19.4x 33.4xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.7x 1.6xmedian 1.5x 2.4xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.1x 10.6xmedian 12.1x 17.9xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.9x 14.9xmedian 16.1x 24.2xmedian 18.3x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.2x 34.4xmedian 2.9x 1.6xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.64 0.65median 0.93 -12.06median 2.09

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFEBOGFFKDP
Revenue – $2.75B $20.09B
Gross profit – $1.11B $9.92B
Operating income – $459.31M $3.26B
Net income – $178.97M $1.50B
Free cash flow – $297.20M $1.97B
EPS (diluted) – $3.96 $1.05
Cash & equivalents $2.09M $110.35M $1.52B
Total debt $4.85M $1.27B $29.98B
Shares (diluted) 11.06M 45.15M 1.36B
Enterprise value -$3.93M $4.00B $43.50B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFEBOGFFKDP
P/E – 24.0x 33.4x
P/FCF – 14.9x 24.2x
P/Operating cash flow – 13.0x 18.8x
P/S – 1.6x 2.4x
P/B 2.2x 34.4x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 2.2x -20.4x -5.4x
EV/EBITDA – 10.6x 17.9x
EV/EBIT – 12.2x 23.3x
EV/Revenue – 2.0x 3.8x
EV/FCF – 18.8x 38.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 16.4x 30.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.65 -12.06

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFEBOGFFKDP
Revenue growth (1Y) – 26.9% 27.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% 11.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 17.9% 14.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.4% 8.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 151.5% 22.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 51.1% 10.4%
Net income growth (1Y) – 155.8% -2.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 35.2% -2.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – 156.8% -7.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 36.9% -2.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 11.2% 19.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -7.7% 9.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 17.2% 23.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -9.7% 6.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFEBOGFFKDP
Gross margin – 40.5% 49.4%
EBITDA margin – 19.3% 21.2%
Operating margin – 16.7% 16.2%
Pretax margin – 13.9% 9.8%
Net margin – 6.5% 7.1%
FCF margin – 10.8% 9.8%
Operating cash flow margin – 12.4% 12.6%
Return on equity – 166.5% 5.1%
Return on assets – 9.5% 1.9%
Return on invested capital – 19.0% 4.3%
Return on capital employed – 27.8% 5.4%
Asset turnover – 1.4x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.9x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFEBOGFFKDP
Debt / assets 15.2% 69.0% 34.2%
Debt / equity 0.3x 9.8x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.2x 6.7x
Debt / FCF – 4.3x 15.2x
Liabilities / assets 54.8% 93.0% 66.6%
Equity / assets 45.2% 7.0% 33.4%
Interest coverage – 5.2x –
Current ratio 1.6x 2.4x 0.5x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.0x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – – 0.79

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFEBOGFFKDP
Dividend yield – 0.9% 2.6%
Net buyback yield – 3.2% -9.2%
Shareholder yield – 4.1% -6.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 21.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 13.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -45.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFEBOGFFKDP
Forward P/E – 19.3xFY2026 14.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $5.06FY2026 $2.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -10.4%FY2026 +15.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +18.0% +11.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.71BFY2026 $25.28BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -32.1%FY2026 +52.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +5.3% +13.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFEBOGFFKDP
Held by institutions – 79.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 347 852
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.9% +12.9%
Institutions buying – 179 469
Institutions selling – 120 284
Buyers to sellers – 1.49 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FEBOGFFKDP
FEBO 1.00 0.09 0.11
GFF 0.09 1.00 0.18
KDP 0.11 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FEBO, GFF and KDP?

Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) $7.75M, Griffon (GFF) $4.41B, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) $47.46B.

Which stock is cheaper, FEBO, GFF and KDP?

Griffon (GFF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Griffon (GFF) 24.7x, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 33.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) is cheapest (Griffon (GFF) 19.3x, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 14.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Griffon (GFF) +26.9%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +27.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) has the highest net margin (Griffon (GFF) 6.5%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 7.1%). On return on invested capital, Griffon (GFF) leads (Griffon (GFF) 19.0%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 4.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) returned the most: Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) +1.3%, Griffon (GFF) +27.8%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +28.8%. Over five years, Griffon (GFF) compounded fastest (Griffon (GFF) +30.6%/yr, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +0.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) 0.00%, Griffon (GFF) 0.01%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 0.00%. Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) and Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) has been the steadiest (Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) 89.4%, Griffon (GFF) 36.0%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 26.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FEBO, GFF and KDP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.