FDS vs CME vs TW Stock Comparison

Factset Research Systems, Cme and Tradeweb Markets Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FDS Factset Research Systems Inc
$309.58 +13.4% 1M +6.6% 1Y
Market cap
$10.91B
P/E
21.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.48B
Div. yield
1.46%
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
3 wins
CME Cme Group Inc.
$293.48 +11.0% 1M +8.3% 1Y
Market cap
$104.90B
P/E
23.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.97B
Div. yield
3.41%
Exchanges Financial Services
5 wins
TW Tradeweb Markets Inc.
$119.67 +18.3% 1M +8.9% 1Y
Market cap
$28.02B
P/E
28.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.21B
Div. yield
0.45%
Exchanges Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Cme leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Cme 5, Tradeweb Markets 4, Factset Research Systems 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFDSCMETWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.91B $104.90B $28.02B CME
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.2x 23.8x 28.3x FDS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.7x 25.0x 28.5x FDS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.7% +9.0% +14.0% TW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.5% 63.3% 40.7% CME
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 16.9% 11.7% — FDS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 0.2x — CME
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.46% 3.41% 0.45% CME
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.6% +8.3% +8.9% TW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.7%/yr +6.1%/yr +6.5%/yr TW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.3% 25.5% 31.0% CME
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 61/100 73/100 TW

Percentile Scorecard

FDSCMETW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFDSCMETW
Valuation 30 #658 of 940 43 #55 of 96 48 #50 of 96
Growth 29 #466 of 655 23 #51 of 66 63 #25 of 66
Profitability 85 #97 of 633 92 #6 of 64 95 #4 of 64
Financial Health 63 #266 of 714 53 #44 of 93 98 #3 of 93
Shareholder Returns 72 #201 of 709 92 #4 of 38 60 #16 of 38
Overall 56 61 73
  • FDS ranked among 1,003 companies in Financial Services
  • CME ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • TW ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFDSCMETWSPY
1 month +13.4%+11.0%+18.3% -0.2%
3 months +9.0%+12.9%+14.8% +3.9%
6 months +34.9%+3.1%+6.5% +8.2%
Year to date +6.7%+7.5%+11.3% +12.9%
1 year +6.6%+8.3%+8.9% +12.3%
3 years -26.4%+40.4%+36.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year -9.7%+12.0%+10.9% +23.3%
5 years -29.4%+34.4%+36.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -6.7%+6.1%+6.5% +10.9%
10 years +100.7%+193.1%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +7.2%+11.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFDSCMETWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.3%25.5%31.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 50.4%27.7%31.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.05-0.38-0.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.140.320.29 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.7%-33.1%-48.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.7%-10.1%-5.5% -1.2%
52-week high $335.45$326.46$126.57 $779.14
52-week low $190.06$218.58$91.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFDSCMETW
P/E now vs peer median 21.2xmedian 13.0x 23.8xmedian 28.3x 28.3xmedian 28.3x
P/S now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 3.2x 15.0xmedian 2.9x 12.7xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.6xmedian 7.4x 21.8xmedian 13.5x 21.4xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.4xmedian 10.8x 24.2xmedian 16.0x 24.5xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 1.2x 3.9xmedian 2.4x 3.8xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 3.22median 0.87 1.74median 0.54 0.73median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFDSCMETW
Revenue $2.48B $6.97B $2.21B
Gross profit $1.25B – –
Operating income $699.96M $4.58B $963.90M
Net income $533.48M $4.42B $1.02B
Free cash flow $707.48M $4.33B $1.14B
EPS (diluted) $14.57 $12.31 $4.22
Cash & equivalents $233.34M $2.20B $2.06B
Total debt $1.37B $13.69B –
Shares (diluted) 36.61M 358.64M 212.80M
Enterprise value $9.77B $93.23B $20.73B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFDSCMETW
P/E 21.2x 23.8x 28.3x
P/FCF 15.4x 24.2x 24.5x
P/Operating cash flow 13.3x 23.7x 23.4x
P/S 4.4x 15.0x 12.7x
P/B 5.5x 3.9x 3.8x
P/Tangible book 71.6x 4.3x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 13.6x 21.8x 21.4x
EV/EBIT 17.2x 23.2x 26.9x
EV/Revenue 4.9x 15.2x 11.8x
EV/FCF 17.0x 24.5x 22.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.6x 23.9x 21.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.22 1.74 0.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFDSCMETW
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.7% 9.0% 14.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.9% 9.2% 21.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.4% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.1% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -6.5% 10.1% 28.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.6% 12.2% 30.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -10.6% 17.3% 60.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.4% 13.1% 38.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -6.3% 19.4% 62.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.6% 13.7% 39.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 13.2% 6.4% 14.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 9.3% 19.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 14.6% 6.1% 13.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.6% 9.4% 19.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFDSCMETW
Gross margin 50.6% – –
EBITDA margin 35.6% 69.8% 54.9%
Operating margin 28.3% 65.7% 43.7%
Pretax margin 26.2% 82.8% 58.9%
Net margin 21.5% 63.3% 40.7%
FCF margin 28.6% 62.1% 51.9%
Operating cash flow margin 33.2% 63.5% 54.2%
Return on equity 26.4% 16.6% 13.9%
Return on assets 12.8% 2.3% 12.3%
Return on invested capital 16.9% 11.7% –
Return on capital employed 22.8% 12.3% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.0x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.0x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 3.4% 1.4% 5.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFDSCMETW
Debt / assets 33.1% 1.8% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 0.2x –
Debt / FCF 1.9x 0.8x –
Liabilities / assets 51.6% 86.2% 11.1%
Equity / assets 48.4% 13.8% 88.9%
Interest coverage 12.8x 26.2x 469.3x
Current ratio 0.6x 1.0x –
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.0x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score 5.00 0.56 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFDSCMETW
Dividend yield 1.5% 3.4% 0.5%
Net buyback yield 5.6% – 1.2%
Shareholder yield 7.1% 3.4% 1.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 10.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 9.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 18.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 15.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFDSCMETW
Forward P/E 16.7xFY2027 25.0xFY2026 28.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $18.55FY2027 $11.74FY2026 $4.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.0%FY2027 +4.8%FY2026 +21.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.9% +19.0% +17.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.68BFY2027 $7.27BFY2026 $2.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.1%FY2027 +11.6%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.7% +7.0% +21.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFDSCMETW
Held by institutions 100.0% 88.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 769 1,691 561
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.1% +0.4% +0.3%
Institutions buying 415 822 300
Institutions selling 244 655 211
Buyers to sellers 1.70 1.25 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FDSCMETW
FDS 1.00 0.21 0.36
CME 0.21 1.00 0.51
TW 0.36 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FDS, CME and TW?

Cme (CME) is the largest by market capitalisation: Factset Research Systems (FDS) $10.91B, Cme (CME) $104.90B, Tradeweb Markets (TW) $28.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, FDS, CME and TW?

Factset Research Systems (FDS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Factset Research Systems (FDS) 21.2x, Cme (CME) 23.8x, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 28.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Factset Research Systems (FDS) is cheapest (Factset Research Systems (FDS) 16.7x, Cme (CME) 25.0x, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 28.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tradeweb Markets (TW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Factset Research Systems (FDS) +6.7%, Cme (CME) +9.0%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +14.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cme (CME) has the highest net margin (Factset Research Systems (FDS) 21.5%, Cme (CME) 63.3%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 40.7%). On return on invested capital, Factset Research Systems (FDS) leads (Factset Research Systems (FDS) 16.9%, Cme (CME) 11.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tradeweb Markets (TW) returned the most: Factset Research Systems (FDS) +6.6%, Cme (CME) +8.3%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +8.9%. Over five years, Tradeweb Markets (TW) compounded fastest (Factset Research Systems (FDS) -6.7%/yr, Cme (CME) +6.1%/yr, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +6.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Cme (CME) has the highest dividend yield: Factset Research Systems (FDS) 1.46%, Cme (CME) 3.41%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 0.45%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cme (CME) has been the steadiest (Factset Research Systems (FDS) 48.3%, Cme (CME) 25.5%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 31.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FDS, CME and TW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cme (CME) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.