FCHS vs RDNT vs CON Stock Comparison

First Choice Healthcare Solutions, RadNet and Concentra Group Holdings Parent Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RDNT RadNet, Inc.
$70.05 -1.0% 1M -16.0% 1Y
Market cap
$5.72B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.27B
Div. yield
–
Healthcare Services Healthcare
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Concentra Group Holdings Parent leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Concentra Group Holdings Parent 6, RadNet 3, First Choice Healthcare Solutions 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFCHSRDNTCONLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $329.58K $5.72B $5.00B RDNT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x -270.9x 25.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 132.2x 23.4x CON
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +18.9% +14.0% RDNT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -0.9% 8.7% CON
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 1.5% 14.2% CON
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -10.9x 2.5x 3.1x FCHS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% -16.0% +92.3% CON
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -36.9%/yr +18.4%/yr — RDNT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 208.8% 42.1% 27.9% CON
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 13/100 39/100 57/100 CON

Percentile Scorecard

FCHSRDNTCON

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFCHSRDNTCON
Valuation 2 #91 of 93 40 #56 of 93 59 #39 of 93
Growth 36 #57 of 88 22 #69 of 88 64 #32 of 88
Profitability – 45 #48 of 87 86 #13 of 87
Financial Health 1 #99 of 100 43 #57 of 100 27 #73 of 100
Shareholder Returns – 42 #33 of 56 51 #28 of 56
Overall 13 39 57
  • FCHS ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • RDNT ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • CON ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFCHSRDNTCONSPY
1 month 0.0%-1.0%+14.9% -0.8%
3 months -50.0%+13.9%+26.0% +3.5%
6 months 0.0%+21.3%+77.4% +7.0%
Year to date 0.0%-1.8%+104.4% +12.2%
1 year 0.0%-16.0%+92.3% +13.0%
3 years 0.0%+175.6%— +86.3%
3 years, per year 0.0%+40.2%— +23.1%
5 years -90.0%+132.8%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -36.9%+18.4%— +11.0%
10 years -99.1%+872.9%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -37.4%+25.6%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFCHSRDNTCONSPY
Volatility, 1Y 208.8%42.1%27.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —42.4%23.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -2.791.020.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.00-0.383.31 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -88.9%-56.2%-23.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -66.7%-17.1%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $0.03$84.48$40.22 $779.14
52-week low $0.01$51.87$18.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFCHSRDNTCON
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 25.1x -258.1xmedian 25.1x 25.3xmedian 25.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.6x 2.4xmedian 1.6x 2.2xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -11.1xmedian 14.5x 25.1xmedian 14.5x 14.3xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 22.4x -16.0xmedian 22.4x 19.2xmedian 22.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 3.1x 4.0xmedian 3.1x 10.6xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median -0.01median 0.66 31.52median 0.66 —median 0.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFCHSRDNTCON
Revenue – $2.27B $2.29B
Gross profit – $261.62M $670.56M
Operating income -$2.85M $70.78M $374.81M
Net income -$7.00M $80.00K $203.80M
Free cash flow -$586.99K -$344.77M $267.42M
EPS (diluted) $-0.22 $-0.27 $1.56
Cash & equivalents $3.86K $726.27M $158.04M
Total debt $118.13M $1.33B $1.57B
Shares (diluted) 32.96M 78.73M 127.79M
Enterprise value $310.94K $2.97B $4.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFCHSRDNTCON
P/E 0.0x -258.1x 25.3x
P/FCF -0.6x -16.0x 19.2x
P/Operating cash flow -0.6x 17.8x 15.3x
P/S – 2.4x 2.2x
P/B 0.0x 4.0x 10.6x
P/Tangible book 0.0x 4.8x 20.3x
EV/EBITDA -11.1x 25.1x 14.3x
EV/EBIT -11.0x 86.4x 17.5x
EV/Revenue – 2.7x 2.9x
EV/FCF -53.3x -17.7x 24.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -53.3x 19.7x 19.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.01 31.52 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFCHSRDNTCON
Revenue growth (1Y) – 18.9% 14.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 14.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 17.8% 18.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 11.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -106.8% 8.5% 18.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 19.9% 5.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) -73.2% -99.3% 32.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.7% -74.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) -72.6% -35.8% 33.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 5.6% -8.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 87.1% 18.5% 29.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.8% 19.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 87.1% -1,140% 43.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.8% -66.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFCHSRDNTCON
Gross margin – 11.5% 29.3%
EBITDA margin – 10.7% 20.0%
Operating margin – 3.1% 16.4%
Pretax margin – 1.5% 11.7%
Net margin – -0.9% 8.7%
FCF margin – -15.2% 11.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 13.7% 14.7%
Return on equity – 1.4% 44.8%
Return on assets -172.9% 0.5% 7.0%
Return on invested capital – 1.5% 14.2%
Return on capital employed – 2.1% 14.5%
Asset turnover – 0.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 3,876x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.6% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFCHSRDNTCON
Debt / assets 764.7% 31.5% 52.3%
Debt / equity -0.8x 1.0x 3.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -10.9x 2.5x 3.1x
Debt / FCF -52.8x -3.9x 5.9x
Liabilities / assets 1,112% 67.0% 83.9%
Equity / assets -1,012% 33.0% 16.1%
Interest coverage -0.6x 1.0x –
Current ratio 0.0x 1.5x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.0x 1.4x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.0x 1.0x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 1.81 2.56

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFCHSRDNTCON
Dividend yield – – 0.6%
Net buyback yield – -0.1% 0.5%
Shareholder yield – -0.1% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 15.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 12.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 33.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFCHSRDNTCON
Forward P/E – 132.2xFY2026 23.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.53FY2026 $1.72FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +35.9%FY2026 +25.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +71.7% +10.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.68BFY2026 $2.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +31.4%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -1.2% +3.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFCHSRDNTCON
Held by institutions – 100.0% 87.3%
Institutions holding – 328 291
Change in shares held, QoQ – +6.0% +4.0%
Institutions buying – 175 166
Institutions selling – 110 81
Buyers to sellers – 1.59 2.05

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FCHSRDNTCON
FCHS 1.00 0.03 -0.03
RDNT 0.03 1.00 0.24
CON -0.03 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FCHS, RDNT and CON?

RadNet (RDNT) is the largest by market capitalisation: First Choice Healthcare Solutions (FCHS) $329.58K, RadNet (RDNT) $5.72B, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) $5.00B.

Which company is growing faster?

RadNet (RDNT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: RadNet (RDNT) +18.9%, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) +14.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) has the highest net margin (RadNet (RDNT) -0.9%, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 8.7%). On return on invested capital, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) leads (RadNet (RDNT) 1.5%, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 14.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) returned the most: First Choice Healthcare Solutions (FCHS) 0.0%, RadNet (RDNT) -16.0%, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) +92.3%. Over five years, RadNet (RDNT) compounded fastest (First Choice Healthcare Solutions (FCHS) -36.9%/yr, RadNet (RDNT) +18.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: RadNet (RDNT) 0.00%, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 0.01%. First Choice Healthcare Solutions (FCHS) and RadNet (RDNT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) has been the steadiest (First Choice Healthcare Solutions (FCHS) 208.8%, RadNet (RDNT) 42.1%, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 27.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FCHS, RDNT and CON?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.