FCFS vs SLM vs EZPW Stock Comparison

FirstCash Holdings, Slm and Ezcorp Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FCFS FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
$190.02 -12.4% 1M +27.3% 1Y
Market cap
$8.15B
P/E
20.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.29B
Div. yield
0.88%
Consumer Lending Financial Services
2 wins
SLM SLM Corp
$17.72 -22.6% 1M -37.3% 1Y
Market cap
$3.24B
P/E
5.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.79B
Div. yield
2.93%
Consumer Lending Financial Services
5 wins
EZPW Ezcorp Inc
$29.70 -3.7% 1M +66.5% 1Y
Market cap
$1.83B
P/E
11.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.58B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Slm leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Slm 5, Ezcorp 5, FirstCash Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFCFSSLMEZPWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.15B $3.24B $1.83B FCFS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 20.1x 5.9x 11.5x SLM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.6x 8.1x 15.5x SLM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.9% -6.7% +28.6% EZPW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.5% 30.9% 10.0% SLM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.7% 16.6% 9.8% SLM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.3x 2.3x 0.8x EZPW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.88% 2.93% 0.00% SLM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.3% -37.3% +66.5% EZPW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.5%/yr -0.7%/yr +31.9%/yr EZPW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.6% 42.5% 42.8% FCFS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 48/100 72/100 EZPW

Percentile Scorecard

FCFSSLMEZPW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFCFSSLMEZPW
Valuation 44 #96 of 169 48 #89 of 169 74 #45 of 169
Growth 76 #40 of 162 27 #119 of 162 90 #17 of 162
Profitability 76 #36 of 149 55 #68 of 149 73 #41 of 149
Financial Health 65 #56 of 158 36 #101 of 158 92 #14 of 158
Shareholder Returns 28 #98 of 136 76 #33 of 136 32 #93 of 136
Overall 58 48 72
  • FCFS ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • SLM ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • EZPW ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFCFSSLMEZPWSPY
1 month -12.4%-22.6%-3.7% +0.9%
3 months -6.0%-31.0%+2.2% +5.9%
6 months -11.9%-22.9%-8.0% +8.5%
Year to date +19.2%-34.5%+52.9% +13.3%
1 year +27.3%-37.3%+66.5% +12.4%
3 years +77.4%+38.3%+270.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year +21.1%+11.4%+54.8% +23.5%
5 years +114.8%-3.4%+298.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year +16.5%-0.7%+31.9% +11.0%
10 years +303.4%+148.9%+197.3% +263.4%
10 years, per year +15.0%+9.5%+11.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureFCFSSLMEZPWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.6%42.5%42.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.8%51.9%43.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.701.041.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.75-0.881.55 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.2%-48.5%-35.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.6%-42.6%-16.5% -0.9%
52-week high $236.43$30.85$35.59 $779.14
52-week low $148.05$17.72$17.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFCFSSLMEZPW
P/E now vs peer median 20.1xmedian 11.4x 5.9xmedian 11.4x 11.5xmedian 11.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.7x 1.8xmedian 2.7x 1.2xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 11.3x 4.0xmedian 11.3x 7.9xmedian 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.7xmedian 6.9x -8.5xmedian 6.9x 13.2xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 0.7x 1.6xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.88median 0.34 0.21median 0.34 0.17median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFCFSSLMEZPW
Revenue $4.29B $1.79B $1.58B
Gross profit $2.15B – $927.76M
Operating income $553.59M – $220.26M
Net income $406.49M $567.40M $159.09M
Free cash flow $518.18M -$381.64M $138.33M
EPS (diluted) $9.38 $2.98 $1.90
Cash & equivalents $203.16M $2.17B $311.03M
Total debt $2.45B $6.43B $519.49M
Shares (diluted) 43.34M 185.57M 83.36M
Enterprise value $7.52B -$13.10B $228.24M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFCFSSLMEZPW
P/E 20.1x 5.9x 11.5x
P/FCF 15.7x -8.5x 13.2x
P/Operating cash flow 12.0x -8.5x 10.1x
P/S 1.9x 1.8x 1.2x
P/B 3.6x 1.4x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 3.9x 1.4x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA 15.2x 4.0x 7.9x
EV/EBIT 18.8x 4.1x 9.2x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 4.2x 1.3x
EV/FCF 20.1x -19.6x 14.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.3x -19.6x 11.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.88 0.21 0.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFCFSSLMEZPW
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.9% -6.7% 28.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 1.6% 16.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.3% – 28.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.4% – 16.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.6% – 59.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.3% – 34.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 31.2% -9.0% 62.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 20.9% 19.1% 64.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 34.7% 3.4% 60.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 22.8% 28.7% 66.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.6% -15.8% 28.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.8% -47.7% 25.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 14.7% -15.8% 39.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.8% -47.7% 39.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFCFSSLMEZPW
Gross margin 50.2% – 58.6%
EBITDA margin 16.0% 104.4% 16.3%
Operating margin 12.9% – 13.9%
Pretax margin 12.9% 41.2% 13.4%
Net margin 9.5% 30.9% 10.0%
FCF margin 12.1% -21.3% 8.7%
Operating cash flow margin 15.8% -21.3% 11.5%
Return on equity 17.7% 24.0% 13.8%
Return on assets 7.4% 1.9% 7.4%
Return on invested capital 8.7% 16.6% 9.8%
Return on capital employed 10.9% – 11.5%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.1x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x -0.7x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 2.6% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFCFSSLMEZPW
Debt / assets 44.0% 21.6% 24.0%
Debt / equity 1.1x 2.9x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.3x 2.3x 0.8x
Debt / FCF 4.7x -16.9x 3.8x
Liabilities / assets 59.1% 92.4% 46.1%
Equity / assets 40.9% 7.6% 53.9%
Interest coverage 3.9x 1.7x 6.7x
Current ratio 4.8x – 4.8x
Quick ratio 0.5x – 1.6x
Cash ratio 0.5x – 1.3x
Altman Z-score 3.42 – 3.13

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFCFSSLMEZPW
Dividend yield 0.9% 2.9% –
Net buyback yield 3.4% 16.8% 0.5%
Shareholder yield 4.3% 19.8% 0.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 17.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -26.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -7.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -1.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFCFSSLMEZPW
Forward P/E 16.6xFY2026 8.1xFY2026 15.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.43FY2026 $2.20FY2026 $1.91FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +30.5%FY2026 -36.4%FY2026 +33.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.7% +30.5% +22.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.25BFY2026 $1.85BFY2026 $1.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.2%FY2026 -6.7%FY2026 +24.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.9% -0.3% +19.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFCFSSLMEZPW
Held by institutions 97.2% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 500 387 313
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% +2.4% +1.4%
Institutions buying 253 193 138
Institutions selling 166 135 116
Buyers to sellers 1.52 1.43 1.19

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FCFSSLMEZPW
FCFS 1.00 0.21 0.70
SLM 0.21 1.00 0.28
EZPW 0.70 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FCFS, SLM and EZPW?

FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) is the largest by market capitalisation: FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) $8.15B, Slm (SLM) $3.24B, Ezcorp (EZPW) $1.83B.

Which stock is cheaper, FCFS, SLM and EZPW?

Slm (SLM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 20.1x, Slm (SLM) 5.9x, Ezcorp (EZPW) 11.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Slm (SLM) is cheapest (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 16.6x, Slm (SLM) 8.1x, Ezcorp (EZPW) 15.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ezcorp (EZPW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +22.9%, Slm (SLM) -6.7%, Ezcorp (EZPW) +28.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Slm (SLM) has the highest net margin (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 9.5%, Slm (SLM) 30.9%, Ezcorp (EZPW) 10.0%). On return on invested capital, Slm (SLM) leads (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 8.7%, Slm (SLM) 16.6%, Ezcorp (EZPW) 9.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ezcorp (EZPW) returned the most: FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +27.3%, Slm (SLM) -37.3%, Ezcorp (EZPW) +66.5%. Over five years, Ezcorp (EZPW) compounded fastest (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +16.5%/yr, Slm (SLM) -0.7%/yr, Ezcorp (EZPW) +31.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Slm (SLM) has the highest dividend yield: FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 0.88%, Slm (SLM) 2.93%, Ezcorp (EZPW) 0.00%. Ezcorp (EZPW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) has been the steadiest (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 36.6%, Slm (SLM) 42.5%, Ezcorp (EZPW) 42.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FCFS, SLM and EZPW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Slm (SLM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.