FCFS vs OSW vs OMF Stock Comparison

FirstCash Holdings, Onespaworld Holdings and OneMain Holdings Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FCFS FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
$190.02 -12.4% 1M +27.3% 1Y
Market cap
$8.08B
P/E
19.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.29B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins
OSW ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd
$28.07 +23.2% 1M +31.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.07B
P/E
29.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.03B
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc.
$57.69 +2.6% 1M -0.3% 1Y
Market cap
$6.84B
P/E
8.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.08B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

OneMain Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (OneMain Holdings 5, FirstCash Holdings 4, Onespaworld Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFCFSOSWOMFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.08B $3.07B $6.84B FCFS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.9x 29.2x 8.8x OMF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.6x 25.3x 9.1x OMF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.9% +9.8% +7.8% FCFS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.5% — 15.4% OMF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.7% — 8.7% OMF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.3x — 6.9x FCFS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.3% +31.8% -0.3% OSW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.5%/yr +21.1%/yr +1.8%/yr OSW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.6% 37.1% 29.3% OMF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 25/100 57/100 FCFS

Percentile Scorecard

FCFSOSWOMF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFCFSOSWOMF
Valuation 44 #96 of 169 13 #29 of 33 70 #52 of 169
Growth 76 #40 of 162 62 #12 of 30 55 #74 of 162
Profitability 76 #36 of 149 – 95 #8 of 149
Financial Health 65 #56 of 158 – 16 #133 of 158
Shareholder Returns 28 #98 of 136 0 #14 of 14 49 #70 of 136
Overall 58 25 57
  • FCFS ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • OSW ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • OMF ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFCFSOSWOMFSPY
1 month -12.4%+23.2%+2.6% +0.9%
3 months -6.0%+8.1%-8.4% +5.9%
6 months -11.9%+13.0%-0.4% +8.5%
Year to date +19.2%+35.3%-14.6% +13.3%
1 year +27.3%+31.8%-0.3% +12.4%
3 years +77.4%+171.2%+62.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year +21.1%+39.5%+17.5% +23.5%
5 years +114.8%+159.9%+9.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year +16.5%+21.1%+1.8% +11.0%
10 years +303.4%—+99.1% +263.4%
10 years, per year +15.0%—+7.1% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureFCFSOSWOMFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.6%37.1%29.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.8%35.4%30.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.700.951.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.750.86-0.01 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.2%-45.0%-46.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.6%-2.1%-19.2% -0.9%
52-week high $236.43$28.68$71.37 $779.14
52-week low $148.05$19.37$49.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFCFSOSWOMF
P/E now vs peer median 20.1xmedian 11.4x 29.2xmedian 14.9x 8.5xmedian 11.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.7x 2.8xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 11.3x —median 9.3x 9.0xmedian 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.7xmedian 6.9x 30.0xmedian 14.5x 2.1xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 0.7x —median 1.8x 2.0xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.88median 0.34 —median 0.35 1.04median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFCFSOSWOMF
Revenue $4.29B $1.03B $5.08B
Gross profit $2.15B – $4.89B
Operating income $553.59M $93.70M $2.92B
Net income $406.49M – $781.00M
Free cash flow $518.18M – $3.23B
EPS (diluted) $9.38 – $6.75
Cash & equivalents $203.16M – $567.00M
Total debt $2.45B – $22.77B
Shares (diluted) 43.34M 102.48M 115.76M
Enterprise value $7.45B $3.07B $3.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFCFSOSWOMF
P/E 20.1x 29.2x 8.5x
P/FCF 15.7x 30.0x 2.1x
P/Operating cash flow 12.0x – 2.1x
P/S 1.9x 2.8x 1.3x
P/B 3.6x – 2.0x
P/Tangible book 3.9x – 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 15.2x – 9.0x
EV/EBIT 18.8x – 9.9x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 2.8x 5.7x
EV/FCF 20.1x – 8.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.3x – 8.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.88 – 1.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFCFSOSWOMF
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.9% 9.8% 7.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 10.2% 6.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.3% – 8.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.4% – 6.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.6% 13.6% 9.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.3% 21.5% 7.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 31.2% – 17.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 20.9% – 6.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 34.7% – 21.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 22.8% – 8.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.6% – 12.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.8% – 9.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 14.7% – 12.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.8% – 9.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFCFSOSWOMF
Gross margin 50.2% – 96.2%
EBITDA margin 16.0% – 63.2%
Operating margin 12.9% – 57.4%
Pretax margin 12.9% – 19.8%
Net margin 9.5% – 15.4%
FCF margin 12.1% – 63.6%
Operating cash flow margin 15.8% – 63.6%
Return on equity 17.7% – 23.1%
Return on assets 7.4% – 2.9%
Return on invested capital 8.7% – 8.7%
Return on capital employed 10.9% – –
Asset turnover 0.8x – 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x – 4.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFCFSOSWOMF
Debt / assets 44.0% – 83.0%
Debt / equity 1.1x – 6.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.3x – 6.9x
Debt / FCF 4.7x – 7.0x
Liabilities / assets 59.1% – 87.7%
Equity / assets 40.9% – 12.3%
Interest coverage 3.9x – –
Current ratio 4.8x – –
Quick ratio 0.5x – –
Cash ratio 0.5x – –
Altman Z-score 3.42 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFCFSOSWOMF
Dividend yield 0.9% 0.7% 7.3%
Net buyback yield 3.4% – 3.6%
Shareholder yield 4.3% 0.7% 10.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFCFSOSWOMF
Forward P/E 16.6xFY2026 25.3xFY2026 9.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.43FY2026 $1.11FY2026 $6.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +30.5%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026 -4.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.7% +10.8% +38.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.25BFY2026 $1.09BFY2026 $5.39BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.2%FY2026 +13.7%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.9% +7.9% +12.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFCFSOSWOMF
Held by institutions 97.2% 100.0% 93.8%
Institutions holding 500 258 520
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% -0.5% +4.6%
Institutions buying 253 144 285
Institutions selling 166 79 172
Buyers to sellers 1.52 1.82 1.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FCFSOSWOMF
FCFS 1.00 0.19 0.21
OSW 0.19 1.00 0.37
OMF 0.21 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FCFS, OSW and OMF?

FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) is the largest by market capitalisation: FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) $8.08B, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) $3.07B, OneMain Holdings (OMF) $6.84B.

Which stock is cheaper, FCFS, OSW and OMF?

OneMain Holdings (OMF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 19.9x, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 29.2x, OneMain Holdings (OMF) 8.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, OneMain Holdings (OMF) is cheapest (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 16.6x, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 25.3x, OneMain Holdings (OMF) 9.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +22.9%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +9.8%, OneMain Holdings (OMF) +7.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

OneMain Holdings (OMF) has the highest net margin (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 9.5%, OneMain Holdings (OMF) 15.4%). On return on invested capital, OneMain Holdings (OMF) leads (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 8.7%, OneMain Holdings (OMF) 8.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) returned the most: FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +27.3%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +31.8%, OneMain Holdings (OMF) -0.3%. Over five years, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) compounded fastest (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +16.5%/yr, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +21.1%/yr, OneMain Holdings (OMF) +1.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, OneMain Holdings (OMF) has been the steadiest (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 36.6%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 37.1%, OneMain Holdings (OMF) 29.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FCFS, OSW and OMF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, OneMain Holdings (OMF) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.