FBYD vs FER vs GDHG Stock Comparison

Falcon's Beyond Global, Ferrovial and Golden Heaven Group Holdings Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FER Ferrovial N.V.
$54.53 -2.2% 1M -14.6% 1Y
Market cap
$40.99B
P/E
39.1x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Ferrovial leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ferrovial 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFBYDFERGDHGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $373.41M $40.99B $833.50K FER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 59.3x 39.1x — FER
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 51.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +144.6% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 33.5% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -17.1% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.2x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -25.9% -14.6% -74.3% FER
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +11.8%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 135.1% 26.3% 95.5% FER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 32/100 47/100 — FER

Percentile Scorecard

FBYDFERGDHG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFBYDFERGDHG
Valuation 4 #50 of 52 35 #34 of 52 –
Growth 42 #22 of 37 – –
Profitability 39 #23 of 37 – –
Financial Health 43 #33 of 57 34 #38 of 57 91 #5 of 47
Shareholder Returns – 72 #8 of 26 –
Overall 32 47 –
  • FBYD ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • FER ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • GDHG ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFBYDFERGDHGSPY
1 month -7.9%-2.2%-3.4% +0.9%
3 months -25.0%-12.8%-18.6% +5.9%
6 months -53.4%-19.3%-31.3% +8.5%
Year to date -48.7%-15.6%-40.3% +13.3%
1 year -25.9%-14.6%-74.3% +12.4%
3 years -40.9%+67.8%-100.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year -16.1%+18.8%-98.4% +23.5%
5 years —+74.8%— +68.2%
5 years, per year —+11.8%— +11.0%
10 years —+157.5%— +263.4%
10 years, per year —+9.9%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureFBYDFERGDHGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 135.1%26.3%95.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 131.6%24.6%105.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.621.040.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.19-0.56-0.78 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -81.3%-34.3%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -63.0%-26.7%-75.3% -0.9%
52-week high $20.80$74.38$4.61 $779.14
52-week low $3.90$48.86$1.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFBYDFERGDHG
P/E now vs peer median 60.3xmedian 27.7x 39.1xmedian 27.7x —median 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 39.4xmedian 0.8x 3.6xmedian 0.8x —median 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -125.1xmedian 12.4x —median 12.4x —median 10.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 23.7x 20.0xmedian 23.7x —median 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 24.8xmedian 2.5x 5.7xmedian 2.5x 0.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.57 —median 0.57 —median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFBYDFERGDHG
Revenue $18.81M – –
Operating income -$7.33M – –
Net income $14.09M – –
R&D $92.00K – –
EPS (diluted) $0.13 – –
Cash & equivalents $3.09M $5.02B $155.88M
Total debt $16.47M $12.25B –
Shares (diluted) 49.33M 718.72M 793.81K
Enterprise value $338.05M $19.24B -$328.65M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFBYDFERGDHG
P/E 60.3x 39.1x –
P/FCF – 20.0x –
P/Operating cash flow – – –
P/S 39.4x 3.6x –
P/B 24.8x 5.7x 0.0x
P/Tangible book 25.6x 5.8x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA -125.1x – –
EV/EBIT -102.9x – –
EV/Revenue 40.1x – –
EV/FCF – – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFBYDFERGDHG
Revenue growth (1Y) 144.6% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 50.2% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -68.3% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) -57.5% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFBYDFERGDHG
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin -32.1% – –
Operating margin -39.0% – –
Pretax margin 74.9% – –
Net margin 33.5% – –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity 52.4% – –
Return on assets 21.6% – –
Return on invested capital -17.1% – –
Return on capital employed -18.0% – –
Asset turnover 0.3x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – –
Stock comp / revenue 9.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFBYDFERGDHG
Debt / assets 25.9% 38.0% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 1.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA -2.2x – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 53.0% 78.5% 23.6%
Equity / assets 47.0% 21.5% 76.4%
Interest coverage -3.2x – –
Current ratio 0.7x 1.1x 3.0x
Quick ratio 0.4x 1.1x 2.4x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.7x 2.4x
Altman Z-score 12.01 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFBYDFERGDHG
Dividend yield – 1.4% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 1.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFBYDFERGDHG
Forward P/E – 51.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.07FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -20.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +12.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $11.77BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +4.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – -5.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFBYDFERGDHG
Held by institutions 4.0% 33.2% –
Institutions holding 59 337 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +47.6% +17.5% –
Institutions buying 40 208 –
Institutions selling 12 103 –
Buyers to sellers 3.33 2.02 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FBYDFERGDHG
FBYD 1.00 0.04 0.06
FER 0.04 1.00 0.03
GDHG 0.06 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FBYD, FER and GDHG?

Ferrovial (FER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Falcon's Beyond Global (FBYD) $373.41M, Ferrovial (FER) $40.99B, Golden Heaven Group Holdings (GDHG) $833.50K.

Which stock is cheaper, FBYD, FER and GDHG?

Ferrovial (FER) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Falcon's Beyond Global (FBYD) 59.3x, Ferrovial (FER) 39.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ferrovial (FER) returned the most: Falcon's Beyond Global (FBYD) -25.9%, Ferrovial (FER) -14.6%, Golden Heaven Group Holdings (GDHG) -74.3%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrovial (FER) has been the steadiest (Falcon's Beyond Global (FBYD) 135.1%, Ferrovial (FER) 26.3%, Golden Heaven Group Holdings (GDHG) 95.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FBYD, FER and GDHG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ferrovial (FER) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.