FANG vs FNV vs VNOM Stock Comparison

Diamondback Energy, Franco Nevada and Viper Energy Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.
$206.43 +12.2% 1M +43.7% 1Y
Market cap
$57.92B
P/E
39.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.10B
Div. yield
2.06%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
5 wins
FNV FRANCO NEVADA Corp
$231.54 -6.6% 1M +24.2% 1Y
Market cap
$44.64B
P/E
30.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.32B
Div. yield
0.73%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
3 wins
VNOM Viper Energy, Inc.
$46.83 +16.8% 1M +26.2% 1Y
Market cap
$16.68B
P/E
153.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.04B
Div. yield
3.48%
Oil and Gas Royalties Energy
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Diamondback Energy leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Diamondback Energy 5, Viper Energy 4, Franco Nevada 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFANGFNVVNOMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $57.92B $44.64B $16.68B FANG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.6x 30.7x 153.8x FNV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.5x 29.6x 17.4x FANG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +21.4% +73.6% +107.8% VNOM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.6% 62.8% 2.9% FNV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.6% — 1.4% FANG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.9x — 1.5x VNOM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.06% 0.73% 3.48% VNOM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +43.7% +24.2% +26.2% FANG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.0%/yr +10.2%/yr — FANG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.9% 39.0% 28.0% VNOM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 80/100 43/100 FNV

Percentile Scorecard

FANGFNVVNOM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFANGFNVVNOM
Valuation 46 #54 of 99 59 #75 of 181 20 #79 of 99
Growth 57 #42 of 97 91 #11 of 110 30 #68 of 97
Profitability 50 #49 of 96 99 #2 of 127 48 #50 of 96
Financial Health 37 #65 of 102 98 #5 of 162 83 #18 of 102
Shareholder Returns 29 #55 of 77 56 #34 of 76 34 #51 of 77
Overall 44 80 43
  • FANG ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • FNV ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • VNOM ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFANGFNVVNOMSPY
1 month +12.2%-6.6%+16.8% +0.7%
3 months +3.3%+4.6%+7.8% +3.7%
6 months +0.4%+0.5%-5.2% +7.1%
Year to date +37.3%+11.7%+21.2% +12.8%
1 year +43.7%+24.2%+26.2% +11.9%
3 years +30.3%+83.4%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +9.2%+22.4%— +22.8%
5 years +92.6%+62.1%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +14.0%+10.2%— +10.9%
10 years +119.6%+260.7%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +8.2%+13.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFANGFNVVNOMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.9%39.0%28.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.6%42.5%29.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.541.27-0.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.370.620.94 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.5%-38.2%-36.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.4%-17.5%-8.1% -1.2%
52-week high $213.69$280.82$50.95 $779.14
52-week low $137.29$184.71$35.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFANGFNVVNOM
P/E now vs peer median 39.6xmedian 11.9x 30.7xmedian 33.5x 153.8xmedian 11.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 2.0x 19.3xmedian 4.9x 8.2xmedian 2.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 5.9x 20.2xmedian 12.0x 17.1xmedian 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.7xmedian 10.0x 25.2xmedian 14.3x 84.2xmedian 10.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.5x 5.4xmedian 1.8x 1.6xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median -1.12median 1.36 1.03median 0.97 —median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFANGFNVVNOM
Revenue $17.10B $2.32B $2.04B
Gross profit – $1.79B –
Operating income $1.08B $1.82B $251.00M
Net income $1.63B $1.48B $103.00M
Free cash flow $3.68B $1.77B $198.00M
EPS (diluted) $5.22 $7.54 $0.30
Cash & equivalents $462.00M $1.01B $77.00M
Total debt $12.61B – $1.68B
Shares (diluted) 281.20M 193.00M 193.73M
Enterprise value $63.10B $42.00B $21.76B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFANGFNVVNOM
P/E 39.6x 30.7x 153.8x
P/FCF 15.7x 25.2x 84.2x
P/Operating cash flow 5.7x 25.1x 11.2x
P/S 3.4x 19.3x 8.2x
P/B 1.3x 5.4x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 5.4x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 11.1x 20.2x 17.1x
EV/EBIT 64.8x 24.0x 72.8x
EV/Revenue 4.1x 18.8x 9.0x
EV/FCF 19.0x 24.6x 92.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 6.9x 24.5x 12.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.12 1.03 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFANGFNVVNOM
Revenue growth (1Y) 21.4% 73.6% 107.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.2% 23.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 88.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 32.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -78.1% 89.7% -56.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -39.5% 34.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) -61.4% 88.3% -83.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -23.4% 30.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) -60.3% 87.7% -89.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -35.2% 29.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 33.8% 53.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.2% 20.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 143.6% 83.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 32.8% 19.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFANGFNVVNOM
Gross margin – 77.3% –
EBITDA margin 37.0% 93.0% 52.3%
Operating margin 6.3% 78.5% 12.3%
Pretax margin 10.8% 85.0% 7.6%
Net margin 8.6% 62.8% 2.9%
FCF margin 21.5% 76.4% 9.7%
Operating cash flow margin 59.3% 76.7% 73.2%
Return on equity 3.5% 18.1% 1.0%
Return on assets 2.2% 16.7% 0.9%
Return on invested capital 1.6% – 1.4%
Return on capital employed 1.7% 20.9% 2.1%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.3x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 6.2x 1.2x 14.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFANGFNVVNOM
Debt / assets 18.0% – 13.9%
Debt / equity 0.3x – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.9x – 1.5x
Debt / FCF 3.4x – 8.5x
Liabilities / assets 37.4% 7.6% 14.7%
Equity / assets 62.6% 92.4% 85.3%
Interest coverage – 1,070x –
Current ratio 0.5x 9.4x 6.4x
Quick ratio 0.4x 8.5x 6.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x 6.9x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 1.69 40.72 5.90

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFANGFNVVNOM
Dividend yield 2.1% 0.7% 3.5%
Net buyback yield 3.0% 0.0% 2.5%
Shareholder yield 5.0% 0.7% 6.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 72.3% 18.0% 413.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) 32.0% 15.1% 215.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) -6.3% 12.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -10.0% 11.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFANGFNVVNOM
Forward P/E 9.5xFY2026 29.6xFY2026 17.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $21.78FY2026 $7.83FY2026 $2.69FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +62.9%FY2026 +40.3%FY2026 +62.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -5.9% +8.8% +2.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.60BFY2026 $2.66BFY2026 $2.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +38.3%FY2026 +46.4%FY2026 +83.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -7.7% +1.3% +2.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFANGFNVVNOM
Held by institutions 71.6% 71.6% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1,191 662 497
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.6% +0.4% +5.4%
Institutions buying 610 336 265
Institutions selling 394 207 150
Buyers to sellers 1.55 1.62 1.77

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FANGFNVVNOM
FANG 1.00 -0.07 0.76
FNV -0.07 1.00 0.00
VNOM 0.76 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FANG, FNV and VNOM?

Diamondback Energy (FANG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Diamondback Energy (FANG) $57.92B, Franco Nevada (FNV) $44.64B, Viper Energy (VNOM) $16.68B.

Which stock is cheaper, FANG, FNV and VNOM?

Franco Nevada (FNV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Diamondback Energy (FANG) 39.6x, Franco Nevada (FNV) 30.7x, Viper Energy (VNOM) 153.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Diamondback Energy (FANG) is cheapest (Diamondback Energy (FANG) 9.5x, Franco Nevada (FNV) 29.6x, Viper Energy (VNOM) 17.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Viper Energy (VNOM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Diamondback Energy (FANG) +21.4%, Franco Nevada (FNV) +73.6%, Viper Energy (VNOM) +107.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Franco Nevada (FNV) has the highest net margin (Diamondback Energy (FANG) 8.6%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 62.8%, Viper Energy (VNOM) 2.9%). On return on invested capital, Diamondback Energy (FANG) leads (Diamondback Energy (FANG) 1.6%, Viper Energy (VNOM) 1.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Diamondback Energy (FANG) returned the most: Diamondback Energy (FANG) +43.7%, Franco Nevada (FNV) +24.2%, Viper Energy (VNOM) +26.2%. Over five years, Diamondback Energy (FANG) compounded fastest (Diamondback Energy (FANG) +14.0%/yr, Franco Nevada (FNV) +10.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Viper Energy (VNOM) has the highest dividend yield: Diamondback Energy (FANG) 2.06%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 0.73%, Viper Energy (VNOM) 3.48%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Viper Energy (VNOM) has been the steadiest (Diamondback Energy (FANG) 31.9%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 39.0%, Viper Energy (VNOM) 28.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FANG, FNV and VNOM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Diamondback Energy (FANG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.