EZPW vs SLM vs BFH Stock Comparison

Ezcorp, Slm and Bread Financial Holdings Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EZPW Ezcorp Inc
$29.70 -3.7% 1M +66.5% 1Y
Market cap
$1.79B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.58B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
3 wins
SLM SLM Corp
$17.72 -22.6% 1M -37.3% 1Y
Market cap
$3.36B
P/E
6.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.79B
Div. yield
0.03%
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Bread Financial Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Bread Financial Holdings 5, Slm 4, Ezcorp 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEZPWSLMBFHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.79B $3.36B $4.03B BFH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.3x 6.1x 7.6x SLM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.5x 8.1x 8.6x SLM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +28.6% -6.7% +5.5% EZPW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.0% 30.9% 13.2% SLM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.8% 16.6% 19.7% BFH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 2.3x -1.0x BFH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.01% SLM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +66.5% -37.3% +61.1% EZPW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.9%/yr -0.7%/yr +9.0%/yr EZPW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.8% 42.5% 39.8% BFH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 72/100 48/100 80/100 BFH

Percentile Scorecard

EZPWSLMBFH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEZPWSLMBFH
Valuation 74 #45 of 169 48 #89 of 169 96 #7 of 169
Growth 90 #17 of 162 27 #119 of 162 55 #73 of 162
Profitability 73 #41 of 149 55 #68 of 149 85 #23 of 149
Financial Health 92 #14 of 158 36 #101 of 158 75 #41 of 158
Shareholder Returns 32 #93 of 136 76 #33 of 136 88 #17 of 136
Overall 72 48 80
  • EZPW ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • SLM ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • BFH ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEZPWSLMBFHSPY
1 month -3.7%-22.6%+3.3% +0.9%
3 months +2.2%-31.0%-2.2% +5.9%
6 months -8.0%-22.9%+22.5% +8.5%
Year to date +52.9%-34.5%+41.3% +13.3%
1 year +66.5%-37.3%+61.1% +12.4%
3 years +270.3%+38.3%+290.9% +88.1%
3 years, per year +54.8%+11.4%+57.6% +23.5%
5 years +298.1%-3.4%+53.8% +68.2%
5 years, per year +31.9%-0.7%+9.0% +11.0%
10 years +197.3%+148.9%-35.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year +11.5%+9.5%-4.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureEZPWSLMBFHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.8%42.5%39.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.4%51.9%45.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.311.041.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.55-0.881.54 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.9%-48.5%-70.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.5%-42.6%-7.7% -0.9%
52-week high $35.59$30.85$113.40 $779.14
52-week low $17.41$17.72$59.98 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEZPWSLMBFH
P/E now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 11.4x 5.9xmedian 11.4x 7.6xmedian 11.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.7x 1.8xmedian 2.7x 1.0xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.9xmedian 11.3x 4.0xmedian 11.3x 1.5xmedian 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 6.9x -8.5xmedian 6.9x 1.8xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 0.7x 1.2xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.17median 0.34 0.21median 0.34 1.01median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEZPWSLMBFH
Revenue $1.58B $1.79B $4.00B
Gross profit $927.76M – –
Operating income $220.26M – –
Net income $159.09M $567.40M $537.00M
Free cash flow $138.33M -$381.64M $2.19B
EPS (diluted) $1.90 $2.98 $13.41
Cash & equivalents $311.03M $2.17B $3.96B
Total debt $519.49M $6.43B $2.32B
Shares (diluted) 83.36M 185.57M 39.30M
Enterprise value $192.80M -$12.99B -$10.86B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEZPWSLMBFH
P/E 11.5x 5.9x 7.6x
P/FCF 13.2x -8.5x 1.8x
P/Operating cash flow 10.1x -8.5x 1.8x
P/S 1.2x 1.8x 1.0x
P/B 1.6x 1.4x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 1.8x 1.4x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 7.9x 4.0x 1.5x
EV/EBIT 9.2x 4.1x 1.6x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 4.2x 0.6x
EV/FCF 14.7x -19.6x 1.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.2x -19.6x 1.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.17 0.21 1.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEZPWSLMBFH
Revenue growth (1Y) 28.6% -6.7% 5.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.1% 1.6% -2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.3% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.4% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 59.4% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.5% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 62.2% -9.0% 13.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 64.8% 19.1% -0.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 60.5% 3.4% 34.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 66.8% 28.7% 7.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 28.8% -15.8% 9.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 25.3% -47.7% 5.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 39.6% -15.8% 9.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.6% -47.7% 5.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEZPWSLMBFH
Gross margin 58.6% – –
EBITDA margin 16.3% 104.4% 39.3%
Operating margin 13.9% – –
Pretax margin 13.4% 41.2% 17.4%
Net margin 10.0% 30.9% 13.2%
FCF margin 8.7% -21.3% 54.7%
Operating cash flow margin 11.5% -21.3% 54.7%
Return on equity 13.8% 24.0% 15.8%
Return on assets 7.4% 1.9% 2.3%
Return on invested capital 9.8% 16.6% 19.7%
Return on capital employed 11.5% – –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -0.7x 4.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% 2.6% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEZPWSLMBFH
Debt / assets 24.0% 21.6% 10.0%
Debt / equity 0.4x 2.9x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 2.3x -1.0x
Debt / FCF 3.8x -16.9x 1.1x
Liabilities / assets 46.1% 92.4% 85.2%
Equity / assets 53.9% 7.6% 14.8%
Interest coverage 6.7x 1.7x 1.9x
Current ratio 4.8x – –
Quick ratio 1.6x – –
Cash ratio 1.3x – –
Altman Z-score 3.13 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEZPWSLMBFH
Dividend yield – 2.9% 0.9%
Net buyback yield 0.5% 16.8% 13.2%
Shareholder yield 0.5% 19.8% 14.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 17.7% 9.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – -26.3% 2.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -7.9% 19.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -1.1% 4.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEZPWSLMBFH
Forward P/E 15.5xFY2026 8.1xFY2026 8.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.91FY2026 $2.20FY2026 $12.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +33.6%FY2026 -36.4%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.0% +30.5% +7.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.57BFY2026 $1.85BFY2026 $3.93BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.0%FY2026 -6.7%FY2026 +2.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.1% -0.3% +11.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEZPWSLMBFH
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 98.3%
Institutions holding 313 387 421
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% +2.4% -14.5%
Institutions buying 138 193 205
Institutions selling 116 135 155
Buyers to sellers 1.19 1.43 1.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EZPWSLMBFH
EZPW 1.00 0.28 0.30
SLM 0.28 1.00 0.49
BFH 0.30 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EZPW, SLM and BFH?

Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ezcorp (EZPW) $1.79B, Slm (SLM) $3.36B, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) $4.03B.

Which stock is cheaper, EZPW, SLM and BFH?

Slm (SLM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ezcorp (EZPW) 11.3x, Slm (SLM) 6.1x, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 7.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Slm (SLM) is cheapest (Ezcorp (EZPW) 15.5x, Slm (SLM) 8.1x, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 8.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ezcorp (EZPW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ezcorp (EZPW) +28.6%, Slm (SLM) -6.7%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +5.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Slm (SLM) has the highest net margin (Ezcorp (EZPW) 10.0%, Slm (SLM) 30.9%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 13.2%). On return on invested capital, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) leads (Ezcorp (EZPW) 9.8%, Slm (SLM) 16.6%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 19.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ezcorp (EZPW) returned the most: Ezcorp (EZPW) +66.5%, Slm (SLM) -37.3%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +61.1%. Over five years, Ezcorp (EZPW) compounded fastest (Ezcorp (EZPW) +31.9%/yr, Slm (SLM) -0.7%/yr, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +9.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Slm (SLM) has the highest dividend yield: Ezcorp (EZPW) 0.00%, Slm (SLM) 0.03%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 0.01%. Ezcorp (EZPW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) has been the steadiest (Ezcorp (EZPW) 42.8%, Slm (SLM) 42.5%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 39.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EZPW, SLM and BFH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.