EZPW vs AFRM vs CACC Stock Comparison

Ezcorp, Affirm Holdings and Credit Acceptance Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EZPW Ezcorp Inc
$29.55 -5.2% 1M +63.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.81B
P/E
11.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.58B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc.
$72.68 +1.6% 1M -4.9% 1Y
Market cap
$24.41B
P/E
12.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.26B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
3 wins
CACC Credit Acceptance Corp
$542.52 -2.4% 1M +7.8% 1Y
Market cap
$5.68B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.33B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Credit Acceptance leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Credit Acceptance 4, Ezcorp 4, Affirm Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEZPWAFRMCACCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.81B $24.41B $5.68B AFRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.5x 12.6x 11.3x CACC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.5x 38.9x 11.8x CACC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +28.6% +32.2% +2.6% AFRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.0% 45.3% 21.5% AFRM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.8% 5.6% 10.7% CACC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 2.3x 5.6x EZPW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +63.3% -4.9% +7.8% EZPW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +32.1%/yr -14.8%/yr -2.1%/yr EZPW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.8% 59.8% 37.6% CACC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 72/100 54/100 64/100 EZPW

Percentile Scorecard

EZPWAFRMCACC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEZPWAFRMCACC
Valuation 74 #44 of 169 31 #117 of 169 58 #71 of 169
Growth 89 #18 of 160 99 #3 of 160 56 #71 of 160
Profitability 75 #38 of 149 64 #54 of 149 93 #12 of 149
Financial Health 92 #14 of 158 61 #62 of 158 33 #107 of 158
Shareholder Returns 29 #97 of 136 13 #118 of 136 82 #26 of 136
Overall 72 54 64
  • EZPW ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • AFRM ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • CACC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEZPWAFRMCACCSPY
1 month -5.2%+1.6%-2.4% -0.2%
3 months -1.6%+0.4%-2.9% +3.9%
6 months -8.4%+15.1%+5.0% +8.2%
Year to date +52.2%-2.4%+22.3% +12.9%
1 year +63.3%-4.9%+7.8% +12.3%
3 years +268.5%+329.3%+34.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +54.5%+62.6%+10.3% +23.3%
5 years +302.6%-55.1%-10.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +32.1%-14.8%-2.1% +10.9%
10 years +189.1%—+196.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +11.2%—+11.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEZPWAFRMCACCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.8%59.8%37.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.2%58.3%39.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.312.611.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.48-0.080.21 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.9%-94.7%-45.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.0%-15.3%-17.4% -1.2%
52-week high $35.59$85.78$657.20 $779.14
52-week low $17.41$42.53$411.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEZPWAFRMCACC
P/E now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 11.1x 12.6xmedian 11.1x 11.3xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.6x 5.8xmedian 2.6x 2.4xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 13.5x 35.0xmedian 13.5x 10.6xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.1xmedian 7.0x 24.7xmedian 7.0x 4.6xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 0.7x 4.5xmedian 0.7x 3.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.17median 0.32 0.23median 0.32 0.51median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEZPWAFRMCACC
Revenue $1.58B $4.26B $2.33B
Gross profit $927.76M – $2.26B
Operating income $220.26M $416.98M $1.10B
Net income $159.09M $1.93B $501.90M
Free cash flow $138.33M $992.63M $1.22B
EPS (diluted) $1.90 $5.53 $46.76
Cash & equivalents $311.03M $1.63B $1.40M
Total debt $519.49M $10.58B $6.29B
Shares (diluted) 83.36M 348.85M 10.73M
Enterprise value $213.42M $18.10B $5.61B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEZPWAFRMCACC
P/E 11.5x 12.6x 11.3x
P/FCF 13.1x 24.7x 4.6x
P/Operating cash flow 10.0x 19.9x 4.6x
P/S 1.1x 5.8x 2.4x
P/B 1.6x 4.5x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 4.5x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA 7.8x 35.0x 10.6x
EV/EBIT 9.2x 62.9x 10.9x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 6.2x 5.1x
EV/FCF 14.6x 26.4x 9.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.1x 21.3x 9.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.17 0.23 0.51

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEZPWAFRMCACC
Revenue growth (1Y) 28.6% 32.2% 2.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.1% 39.0% 8.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.3% – 2.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.4% – 8.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 59.4% 577.8% 8.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.5% 32.9% 19.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 62.2% 3,598% 18.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 64.8% 58.2% 14.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 60.5% 3,515% 29.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 66.8% 54.1% 22.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 28.8% 55.1% 10.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 25.3% 365.8% 0.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 39.6% 65.0% 10.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.6% 123.3% 0.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEZPWAFRMCACC
Gross margin 58.6% – 97.0%
EBITDA margin 16.3% 17.6% 48.1%
Operating margin 13.9% 9.8% 47.0%
Pretax margin 13.4% 11.6% 27.9%
Net margin 10.0% 45.3% 21.5%
FCF margin 8.7% 23.3% 52.4%
Operating cash flow margin 11.5% 28.9% 52.6%
Return on equity 13.8% 41.6% 32.3%
Return on assets 7.4% 13.3% 5.8%
Return on invested capital 9.8% 5.6% 10.7%
Return on capital employed 11.5% – –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.3x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 0.6x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% 7.2% 1.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEZPWAFRMCACC
Debt / assets 24.0% 21.1% 72.9%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.6x 4.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 2.3x 5.6x
Debt / FCF 3.8x 3.4x 5.1x
Liabilities / assets 46.1% 65.3% 81.6%
Equity / assets 53.9% 34.7% 18.4%
Interest coverage 6.7x 0.9x 2.5x
Current ratio 4.8x – –
Quick ratio 1.6x – –
Cash ratio 1.3x – –
Altman Z-score 3.13 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEZPWAFRMCACC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.5% -0.6% 9.1%
Shareholder yield 0.5% -0.6% 9.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEZPWAFRMCACC
Forward P/E 15.5xFY2026 38.9xFY2027 11.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.91FY2026 $1.87FY2027 $45.85FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +33.6%FY2026 -66.2%FY2027 +16.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.0% +44.4% +20.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.57BFY2026 $5.23BFY2027 $2.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.0%FY2026 +22.7%FY2027 -0.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.1% +24.0% +1.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEZPWAFRMCACC
Held by institutions 100.0% 77.1% 72.5%
Institutions holding 313 658 298
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% +8.1% +11.5%
Institutions buying 138 401 174
Institutions selling 116 173 88
Buyers to sellers 1.19 2.32 1.98

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EZPWAFRMCACC
EZPW 1.00 0.14 0.23
AFRM 0.14 1.00 0.36
CACC 0.23 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EZPW, AFRM and CACC?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ezcorp (EZPW) $1.81B, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) $24.41B, Credit Acceptance (CACC) $5.68B.

Which stock is cheaper, EZPW, AFRM and CACC?

Credit Acceptance (CACC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ezcorp (EZPW) 11.5x, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 12.6x, Credit Acceptance (CACC) 11.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Credit Acceptance (CACC) is cheapest (Ezcorp (EZPW) 15.5x, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 38.9x, Credit Acceptance (CACC) 11.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ezcorp (EZPW) +28.6%, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) +32.2%, Credit Acceptance (CACC) +2.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) has the highest net margin (Ezcorp (EZPW) 10.0%, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 45.3%, Credit Acceptance (CACC) 21.5%). On return on invested capital, Credit Acceptance (CACC) leads (Ezcorp (EZPW) 9.8%, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 5.6%, Credit Acceptance (CACC) 10.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ezcorp (EZPW) returned the most: Ezcorp (EZPW) +63.3%, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) -4.9%, Credit Acceptance (CACC) +7.8%. Over five years, Ezcorp (EZPW) compounded fastest (Ezcorp (EZPW) +32.1%/yr, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) -14.8%/yr, Credit Acceptance (CACC) -2.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Credit Acceptance (CACC) has been the steadiest (Ezcorp (EZPW) 42.8%, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 59.8%, Credit Acceptance (CACC) 37.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EZPW, AFRM and CACC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Credit Acceptance (CACC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.