EW vs ISRG vs ABT Stock Comparison

Edwards Lifesciences, Intuitive Surgical and Abbott Laboratories Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EW Edwards Lifesciences Corp
$90.57 +5.0% 1M +19.0% 1Y
Market cap
$52.36B
P/E
52.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.51B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
2 wins
ISRG Intuitive Surgical Inc
$451.63 +11.5% 1M -17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$155.69B
P/E
52.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.58B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
4 wins
ABT Abbott Laboratories
$104.88 +3.5% 1M -17.3% 1Y
Market cap
$181.26B
P/E
38.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$48.23B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Intuitive Surgical leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Intuitive Surgical 4, Abbott Laboratories 3, Edwards Lifesciences 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEWISRGABTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $52.36B $155.69B $181.26B ABT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 52.1x 52.6x 38.6x ABT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 32.0x 39.4x 18.4x ABT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.6% +20.5% +10.0% ISRG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.4% 25.5% — ISRG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.3x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +19.0% -17.4% -17.3% EW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.8%/yr +5.3%/yr -3.9%/yr ISRG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 24.8% 34.6% 27.4% EW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 77/100 80/100 60/100 ISRG

Percentile Scorecard

EWISRGABT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEWISRGABT
Valuation 63 #84 of 228 53 #108 of 228 74 #61 of 228
Growth 54 #103 of 221 80 #45 of 221 17 #183 of 221
Profitability 95 #12 of 208 98 #6 of 208 –
Financial Health 87 #32 of 239 78 #53 of 239 –
Shareholder Returns 88 #17 of 137 92 #12 of 137 90 #15 of 137
Overall 77 80 60
  • EW ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ISRG ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ABT ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEWISRGABTSPY
1 month +5.0%+11.5%+3.5% -0.8%
3 months +9.0%+26.6%+0.3% +3.5%
6 months +8.5%-4.1%+13.0% +7.0%
Year to date +6.2%-20.3%-16.3% +12.2%
1 year +19.0%-17.4%-17.3% +13.0%
3 years +46.8%+74.4%+13.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +13.7%+20.4%+4.1% +23.1%
5 years -22.0%+29.4%-17.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year -4.8%+5.3%-3.9% +11.0%
10 years +188.3%+510.6%+162.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year +11.2%+19.8%+10.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureEWISRGABTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 24.8%34.6%27.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.5%37.5%27.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.580.900.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.77-0.50-0.63 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.3%-49.9%-41.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.8%-23.8%-19.7% -1.8%
52-week high $95.17$592.85$130.59 $779.14
52-week low $75.87$332.02$82.56 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEWISRGABT
P/E now vs peer median 51.9xmedian 30.6x 53.3xmedian 30.6x 38.8xmedian 30.6x
P/S now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 3.0x 13.5xmedian 3.0x 3.8xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.1xmedian 17.5x 37.3xmedian 17.5x —median 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 36.4xmedian 23.3x 43.5xmedian 23.3x 22.3xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 2.4x 9.7xmedian 2.4x —median 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -6.06median 0.87 2.07median 0.87 -13.07median 0.87

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEWISRGABT
Revenue $6.51B $11.58B $48.23B
Gross profit $5.07B $7.78B –
Operating income $1.45B $3.28B $6.65B
Net income $1.00B $2.97B –
Free cash flow $1.43B $3.60B –
R&D $1.09B $1.49B $3.31B
EPS (diluted) $1.74 $8.41 $2.70
Cash & equivalents $2.91B $2.98B –
Total debt $598.70M – –
Shares (diluted) 577.60M 351.60M 1.74B
Enterprise value $36.37B $135.97B $181.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEWISRGABT
P/E 51.9x 53.3x 38.8x
P/FCF 36.4x 43.5x 22.3x
P/Operating cash flow 30.4x 38.3x –
P/S 8.0x 13.5x 3.8x
P/B 4.9x 9.7x –
P/Tangible book 5.6x 10.5x –
EV/EBITDA 30.1x 37.3x –
EV/EBIT 33.5x 46.4x –
EV/Revenue 7.5x 13.2x 3.8x
EV/FCF 33.9x 42.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow 28.2x 37.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -6.06 2.07 -13.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEWISRGABT
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.6% 20.5% 10.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.3% 19.1% 6.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.0% 21.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.9% 19.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -1.4% 16.6% -13.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 5.0% 24.8% 3.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -75.8% 7.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -10.2% 24.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) -75.3% 10.8% -66.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -8.6% 25.7% -3.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 116.4% 38.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.3% 26.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 143.9% 58.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.9% 42.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEWISRGABT
Gross margin 77.8% 67.2% –
EBITDA margin 24.8% 35.3% –
Operating margin 22.3% 28.4% –
Pretax margin 21.8% 31.3% –
Net margin 15.4% 25.5% –
FCF margin 22.0% 31.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 26.4% 35.3% –
Return on equity 9.5% 17.3% –
Return on assets 7.4% 14.8% –
Return on invested capital 9.0% – –
Return on capital employed 12.0% 18.7% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.6x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.6% 7.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEWISRGABT
Debt / assets 4.3% – –
Debt / equity 0.1x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -2.3x – –
Debt / FCF 0.4x – –
Liabilities / assets 22.7% 16.7% –
Equity / assets 77.3% 83.3% –
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 4.5x 3.3x –
Quick ratio 3.5x 2.3x –
Cash ratio 2.8x 1.6x –
Altman Z-score 12.75 30.92 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEWISRGABT
Dividend yield – – 2.4%
Net buyback yield 1.9% 2.7% –
Shareholder yield 1.9% 2.7% 2.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEWISRGABT
Forward P/E 32.0xFY2026 39.4xFY2026 18.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.83FY2026 $11.47FY2026 $5.69FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +10.5%FY2026 +28.4%FY2026 +10.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.7% +4.5% +10.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.24BFY2026 $11.60BFY2026 $53.00BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +19.2%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026 +19.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.6% +11.3% -2.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEWISRGABT
Held by institutions 90.6% 86.2% 79.2%
Institutions holding 1,323 2,235 2,977
Change in shares held, QoQ +20.4% +4.6% +0.3%
Institutions buying 641 1,070 1,258
Institutions selling 453 877 1,376
Buyers to sellers 1.42 1.22 0.91

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EWISRGABT
EW 1.00 0.44 0.32
ISRG 0.44 1.00 0.32
ABT 0.32 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EW, ISRG and ABT?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Edwards Lifesciences (EW) $52.36B, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) $155.69B, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) $181.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, EW, ISRG and ABT?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Edwards Lifesciences (EW) 52.1x, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 52.6x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 38.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is cheapest (Edwards Lifesciences (EW) 32.0x, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 39.4x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 18.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Edwards Lifesciences (EW) +14.6%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +20.5%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) +10.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) has the highest net margin (Edwards Lifesciences (EW) 15.4%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 25.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Edwards Lifesciences (EW) returned the most: Edwards Lifesciences (EW) +19.0%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) -17.4%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -17.3%. Over five years, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) compounded fastest (Edwards Lifesciences (EW) -4.8%/yr, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +5.3%/yr, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -3.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Edwards Lifesciences (EW) has been the steadiest (Edwards Lifesciences (EW) 24.8%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 34.6%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 27.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EW, ISRG and ABT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.