EVR vs HLI vs LAZ Stock Comparison

Evercore, Houlihan Lokey and Lazard Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PJT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
EVR Evercore Inc.
$289.89 +8.1% 1M -4.5% 1Y
Market cap
$10.90B
P/E
14.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.87B
Div. yield
0.01%
Investment Banking Financial Services
9 wins
HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
$147.26 +15.0% 1M -17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$9.70B
P/E
24.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.56B
Div. yield
–
Investment Banking Financial Services
2 wins
LAZ Lazard, Inc.
$38.55 +6.0% 1M -22.3% 1Y
Market cap
$3.87B
P/E
20.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.38B
Div. yield
0.05%
Investment Banking Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Evercore leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Evercore 9, Houlihan Lokey 2, Lazard 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEVRHLILAZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.90B $9.70B $3.87B EVR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.3x 24.1x 20.9x EVR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.1x 20.9x 29.9x EVR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +36.8% -0.4% +9.0% EVR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.6% 15.7% 5.5% HLI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 30.9% — 6.2% EVR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.1x — 0.5x EVR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.05% LAZ
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.5% -17.9% -22.3% EVR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.9%/yr +4.8%/yr -4.3%/yr EVR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.9% 31.1% 44.1% HLI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 78/100 51/100 61/100 EVR

Percentile Scorecard

EVRHLILAZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEVRHLILAZ
Valuation 67 #35 of 103 62 #40 of 103 89 #12 of 103
Growth 78 #16 of 70 20 #56 of 70 67 #24 of 70
Profitability 86 #11 of 74 62 #29 of 74 60 #30 of 74
Financial Health 86 #15 of 100 – 40 #60 of 100
Shareholder Returns 74 #11 of 40 62 #16 of 40 46 #22 of 40
Overall 78 51 61
  • EVR ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • HLI ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • LAZ ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEVRHLILAZSPY
1 month +8.1%+15.0%+6.0% -5.9%
3 months -6.6%+15.5%-11.0% -4.6%
6 months -12.5%-4.1%-17.0% +0.2%
Year to date -14.8%-15.5%-20.6% +7.5%
1 year -4.5%-17.9%-22.3% +8.2%
3 years +108.6%+40.8%+36.2% +68.3%
3 years, per year +27.8%+12.1%+10.8% +19.0%
5 years +91.7%+26.4%-19.6% +56.5%
5 years, per year +13.9%+4.8%-4.3% +9.4%
10 years +428.5%+527.2%+1.5% +251.5%
10 years, per year +18.1%+20.2%+0.1% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureEVRHLILAZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.9%31.1%44.1% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.4%32.7%49.5% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.730.761.85 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.11-0.58-0.51 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -48.4%-41.0%-45.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.3%-23.3%-32.4% -5.9%
52-week high $383.12$192.07$57.00 $779.14
52-week low $247.98$123.39$34.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEVRHLILAZ
P/E now vs peer median 14.6xmedian 28.4x 24.4xmedian 28.4x 21.1xmedian 28.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 2.9x 4.0xmedian 2.9x 1.3xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.5xmedian 13.2x 17.0xmedian 13.2x 5.8xmedian 13.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.1xmedian 15.1x 25.4xmedian 15.1x 6.2xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 11.4xmedian 2.3x 4.4xmedian 2.3x 4.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.44median 0.47 1.40median 0.47 0.39median 0.47

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEVRHLILAZ
Revenue $4.87B $2.56B $3.38B
Operating income – $517.88M $266.88M
Net income $829.02M $404.38M $198.53M
Free cash flow $1.73B $401.82M $684.97M
EPS (diluted) $18.60 $6.00 $1.72
Cash & equivalents $1.23B $837.00M $1.26B
Total debt $540.13M – $1.69B
Shares (diluted) 40.92M 67.00M 107.28M
Enterprise value $614.47M $5.87B -$984.36M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEVRHLILAZ
P/E 14.6x 24.4x 21.1x
P/FCF 15.1x 25.4x 6.2x
P/Operating cash flow 14.7x 23.9x 6.0x
P/S 5.3x 4.0x 1.3x
P/B 11.4x 4.4x 4.5x
P/Tangible book 11.5x 4.9x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 21.5x 17.0x 5.8x
EV/EBIT 22.2x 18.1x 17.5x
EV/Revenue 4.9x 3.7x 1.4x
EV/FCF 13.8x 23.4x 6.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.4x 22.0x 6.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.44 1.40 0.39

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEVRHLILAZ
Revenue growth (1Y) 36.8% -0.4% 9.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 25.1% 12.7% 10.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -0.1% -23.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 15.2% 75.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 44.7% -5.1% -27.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 33.8% 17.2% 64.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 49.3% -3.5% -31.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.4% 17.5% 54.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 55.6% -47.7% 45.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 61.9% 8.8% 72.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 63.2% -48.7% 55.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 63.6% 15.7% 94.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEVRHLILAZ
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 22.6% 21.6% 23.9%
Operating margin – 20.3% 7.9%
Pretax margin 21.3% 21.5% 5.2%
Net margin 15.6% 15.7% 5.5%
FCF margin 35.4% 15.7% 20.3%
Operating cash flow margin 36.3% 16.7% 20.7%
Return on equity 37.2% 17.7% 21.4%
Return on assets 16.6% 10.5% 4.4%
Return on invested capital 30.9% – 6.2%
Return on capital employed 31.8% – –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.7x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 1.1x 3.5x
Stock comp / revenue 16.0% 7.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEVRHLILAZ
Debt / assets 10.2% – 37.2%
Debt / equity 0.2x – 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.1x – 0.5x
Debt / FCF 0.3x – 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 56.9% 42.0% 79.1%
Equity / assets 43.1% 58.0% 20.9%
Interest coverage 31.3x – 3.0x
Current ratio 2.2x – –
Quick ratio 2.2x – –
Cash ratio 1.8x – –
Altman Z-score 8.03 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEVRHLILAZ
Dividend yield 1.2% 1.8% 5.2%
Net buyback yield 4.1% 2.3% 3.2%
Shareholder yield 5.3% 4.1% 8.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 18.3% – 96.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) 8.8% – 28.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) 6.1% – 4.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 6.0% – 3.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEVRHLILAZ
Forward P/E 14.1xFY2026 20.9xFY2026 29.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $20.57FY2026 $7.03FY2026 $1.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +41.3%FY2026 -7.0%FY2026 -47.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -0.3% +19.8% +158.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.73BFY2026 $2.87BFY2026 $3.40BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.9%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026 +9.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.8% +6.8% +10.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEVRHLILAZ
Held by institutions 92.0% 80.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding 704 520 347
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% +3.1% +10.6%
Institutions buying 362 237 186
Institutions selling 238 200 106
Buyers to sellers 1.52 1.19 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EVRHLILAZ
EVR 1.00 0.67 0.74
HLI 0.67 1.00 0.59
LAZ 0.74 0.59 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EVR, HLI and LAZ?

Evercore (EVR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Evercore (EVR) $10.90B, Houlihan Lokey (HLI) $9.70B, Lazard (LAZ) $3.87B.

Which stock is cheaper, EVR, HLI and LAZ?

Evercore (EVR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Evercore (EVR) 14.3x, Houlihan Lokey (HLI) 24.1x, Lazard (LAZ) 20.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Evercore (EVR) is cheapest (Evercore (EVR) 14.1x, Houlihan Lokey (HLI) 20.9x, Lazard (LAZ) 29.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Evercore (EVR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Evercore (EVR) +36.8%, Houlihan Lokey (HLI) -0.4%, Lazard (LAZ) +9.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Houlihan Lokey (HLI) has the highest net margin (Evercore (EVR) 15.6%, Houlihan Lokey (HLI) 15.7%, Lazard (LAZ) 5.5%). On return on invested capital, Evercore (EVR) leads (Evercore (EVR) 30.9%, Lazard (LAZ) 6.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Evercore (EVR) returned the most: Evercore (EVR) -4.5%, Houlihan Lokey (HLI) -17.9%, Lazard (LAZ) -22.3%. Over five years, Evercore (EVR) compounded fastest (Evercore (EVR) +13.9%/yr, Houlihan Lokey (HLI) +4.8%/yr, Lazard (LAZ) -4.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Lazard (LAZ) has the highest dividend yield: Evercore (EVR) 0.01%, Houlihan Lokey (HLI) 0.00%, Lazard (LAZ) 0.05%. Houlihan Lokey (HLI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Houlihan Lokey (HLI) has been the steadiest (Evercore (EVR) 39.9%, Houlihan Lokey (HLI) 31.1%, Lazard (LAZ) 44.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EVR, HLI and LAZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Evercore (EVR) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.