EVOH vs TT vs MOD Stock Comparison

EvoAir Holdings, Trane Technologies and Modine Manufacturing Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EVOH EvoAir Holdings Inc.
$23.00 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$625.15M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$319.05K
Div. yield
–
HVAC Industrials
3 wins
TT Trane Technologies plc
$461.22 +1.4% 1M +7.7% 1Y
Market cap
$101.48B
P/E
34.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$22.21B
Div. yield
0.89%
HVAC Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Trane Technologies leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Trane Technologies 4, EvoAir Holdings 3, Modine Manufacturing 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEVOHTTMODLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $625.15M $101.48B $7.20B TT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -152.7x 34.6x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 29.5x 20.2x MOD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.1% +7.0% — EVOH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1,283.3% 13.3% — TT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 24.4% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 0.8x — EVOH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.89% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% +7.7% -16.2% TT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.1%/yr +20.5%/yr +65.8%/yr MOD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 0.0% 29.2% 71.9% EVOH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 51/100 — TT

Percentile Scorecard

EVOHTTMOD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEVOHTTMOD
Valuation 2 #55 of 56 9 #51 of 56 –
Growth 61 #21 of 52 65 #19 of 52 –
Profitability 2 #48 of 49 90 #6 of 49 –
Financial Health 69 #18 of 56 56 #25 of 56 58 #24 of 56
Shareholder Returns – 38 #26 of 41 –
Overall 33 51 –
  • EVOH ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products
  • TT ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products
  • MOD ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEVOHTTMODSPY
1 month 0.0%+1.4%-31.0% -0.2%
3 months 0.0%-1.9%-34.2% +3.9%
6 months 0.0%-4.1%-42.4% +8.2%
Year to date 0.0%+18.5%+2.3% +12.9%
1 year 0.0%+7.7%-16.2% +12.3%
3 years +4.4%+149.7%+249.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +1.4%+35.7%+51.9% +23.3%
5 years +130.0%+153.8%+1,152.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year +18.1%+20.5%+65.8% +10.9%
10 years —+786.8%+1,170.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+24.4%+29.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEVOHTTMODSPY
Volatility, 1Y 0.0%29.2%71.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —30.2%76.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.001.153.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —0.26-0.23 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.4%-40.3%-57.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-8.4%-55.5% -1.2%
52-week high $23.00$503.46$306.89 $779.14
52-week low $23.00$376.43$119.68 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEVOHTTMOD
P/E now vs peer median -152.7xmedian 20.1x 34.6xmedian 20.1x —median 20.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1,959xmedian 1.5x 4.6xmedian 1.5x —median 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -393.6xmedian 11.8x 23.9xmedian 11.8x —median 11.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -439.7xmedian 16.2x 28.3xmedian 16.2x —median 16.2x
P/B now vs peer median 15.9xmedian 2.9x 11.7xmedian 2.9x 6.0xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 4.20median 0.99 1.97median 0.99 —median 0.99

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEVOHTTMOD
Revenue $319.05K $22.21B –
Gross profit $21.53K $7.86B –
Operating income -$4.21M $3.98B –
Net income -$4.35M $2.97B –
Free cash flow -$1.42M $3.58B –
EPS (diluted) $-0.15 $13.25 –
Cash & equivalents $277.55K $1.32B $73.50M
Total debt – $4.62B $436.30M
Shares (diluted) 27.18M 222.50M 52.80M
Enterprise value $623.46M $96.22B $6.83B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEVOHTTMOD
P/E -152.7x 34.6x –
P/FCF -439.7x 28.3x –
P/Operating cash flow -459.7x 25.9x –
P/S 1,959x 4.6x –
P/B 15.9x 11.7x 6.0x
P/Tangible book 3,093x 19.8x 7.2x
EV/EBITDA -393.6x 23.9x –
EV/EBIT -148.6x 26.3x –
EV/Revenue 1,960x 4.7x –
EV/FCF -439.9x 29.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow -459.9x 26.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.20 1.97 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEVOHTTMOD
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.1% 7.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.3% 9.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 208.9% 4.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 37.4% 0.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 71.8% 4.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.8% 14.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 70.9% 3.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 11.7% 16.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) 72.4% 4.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -36.4% 17.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -22.6% 19.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 28.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -26.9% 26.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.6% 32.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEVOHTTMOD
Gross margin 6.7% 35.4% –
EBITDA margin -498.1% 19.7% –
Operating margin -1,319% 17.9% –
Pretax margin -1,364% 16.8% –
Net margin -1,283% 13.3% –
FCF margin -445.6% 16.1% –
Operating cash flow margin -426.2% 17.6% –
Return on equity -11.1% 34.4% –
Return on assets -10.0% 12.7% –
Return on invested capital – 24.4% –
Return on capital employed -11.0% 26.7% –
Asset turnover 0.0x 1.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEVOHTTMOD
Debt / assets 1.3% 19.3% 16.3%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.5x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 0.8x –
Debt / FCF -0.4x 1.3x –
Liabilities / assets 9.3% 63.9% 55.0%
Equity / assets 90.7% 36.1% 45.0%
Interest coverage – 18.1x –
Current ratio 0.1x 1.1x 1.9x
Quick ratio 0.1x 0.7x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 90.81 6.11 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEVOHTTMOD
Dividend yield – 0.9% –
Net buyback yield – 1.3% –
Shareholder yield – 2.2% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 29.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 24.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 10.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEVOHTTMOD
Forward P/E – 29.5xFY2026 20.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $15.64FY2026 $6.76FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +19.8%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.2% +52.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $25.40BFY2026 $4.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +19.1%FY2026 +32.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +7.8% +16.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEVOHTTMOD
Held by institutions – 87.0% 98.5%
Institutions holding – 1,810 634
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.3% -4.8%
Institutions buying – 894 348
Institutions selling – 579 223
Buyers to sellers – 1.54 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EVOHTTMOD
EVOH – – –
TT – 1.00 0.65
MOD – 0.65 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EVOH, TT and MOD?

Trane Technologies (TT) is the largest by market capitalisation: EvoAir Holdings (EVOH) $625.15M, Trane Technologies (TT) $101.48B, Modine Manufacturing (MOD) $7.20B.

Which company is growing faster?

EvoAir Holdings (EVOH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: EvoAir Holdings (EVOH) +12.1%, Trane Technologies (TT) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Trane Technologies (TT) has the highest net margin (EvoAir Holdings (EVOH) -1,283.3%, Trane Technologies (TT) 13.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Trane Technologies (TT) returned the most: EvoAir Holdings (EVOH) 0.0%, Trane Technologies (TT) +7.7%, Modine Manufacturing (MOD) -16.2%. Over five years, Modine Manufacturing (MOD) compounded fastest (EvoAir Holdings (EVOH) +18.1%/yr, Trane Technologies (TT) +20.5%/yr, Modine Manufacturing (MOD) +65.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Trane Technologies (TT) 0.89%, Modine Manufacturing (MOD) 0.00%. EvoAir Holdings (EVOH) and Modine Manufacturing (MOD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, EvoAir Holdings (EVOH) has been the steadiest (EvoAir Holdings (EVOH) 0.0%, Trane Technologies (TT) 29.2%, Modine Manufacturing (MOD) 71.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EVOH, TT and MOD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Trane Technologies (TT) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.