EVLV vs NEON vs ROC Stock Comparison

Evolv Technologies Holdings, Neonode and Rank One Computing Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NEON Neonode Inc.
$0.69 -22.5% 1M -78.5% 1Y
Market cap
$11.75M
P/E
1.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.04M
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Evolv Technologies Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Evolv Technologies Holdings 5, Neonode 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEVLVNEONROCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $863.60M $11.75M $68.50M EVLV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -165.4x 1.4x -17.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +41.7% -21.7% — EVLV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.0% 398.1% -25.4% NEON
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -23.8% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -41.6% -78.5% — EVLV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.5%/yr -40.1%/yr — EVLV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.4% 73.0% 72.2% EVLV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 65/100 58/100 NEON

Percentile Scorecard

EVLVNEONROC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEVLVNEONROC
Valuation 53 #59 of 124 76 #31 of 124 30 #87 of 124
Growth 99 #2 of 113 35 #74 of 113 –
Profitability 51 #54 of 109 64 #40 of 109 54 #51 of 109
Financial Health 33 #86 of 127 87 #18 of 127 90 #14 of 127
Shareholder Returns 36 #41 of 63 – –
Overall 54 65 58
  • EVLV ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • NEON ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ROC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEVLVNEONROCSPY
1 month +2.4%-22.5%-13.3% +0.9%
3 months -14.2%-8.0%-15.5% +5.9%
6 months -32.3%-56.1%-41.3% +8.5%
Year to date -33.5%-60.3%— +13.3%
1 year -41.6%-78.5%— +12.4%
3 years +23.6%-40.0%— +88.1%
3 years, per year +7.3%-15.7%— +23.5%
5 years -16.3%-92.2%— +68.2%
5 years, per year -3.5%-40.1%— +11.0%
10 years —-94.6%— +263.4%
10 years, per year —-25.3%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureEVLVNEONROCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.4%73.0%72.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.9%81.5%68.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.332.400.43 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.81-1.08— 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.9%-97.6%-53.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.6%-78.5%-49.9% -0.9%
52-week high $8.15$3.21$7.31 $779.14
52-week low $4.05$0.69$3.39 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEVLVNEONROC
P/E now vs peer median -164.2xmedian 37.9x 1.4xmedian 37.9x -17.4xmedian 37.9x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 4.4x 5.7xmedian 4.4x 4.4xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -100.9xmedian 34.5x -1.4xmedian 34.5x -15.4xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2,418xmedian 26.6x -1.0xmedian 26.6x -11.3xmedian 26.6x
P/B now vs peer median 7.2xmedian 3.4x 0.6xmedian 3.4x 3.9xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median -2.39median 1.24 0.03median 1.24 —median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEVLVNEONROC
Revenue $171.44M $2.04M $15.78M
Gross profit $85.49M $2.02M $13.08M
Operating income -$35.60M $7.05M -$3.98M
Net income -$5.22M $8.13M -$4.01M
Free cash flow -$356.00K -$11.28M -$6.17M
R&D $22.69M $3.64M $7.15M
EPS (diluted) $-0.03 $0.48 $-0.21
Cash & equivalents $52.70M $21.32M $11.91M
Total debt $28.74M – –
Shares (diluted) 180.10M 16.78M 19.08M
Enterprise value $614.63M -$69.75M $39.64M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEVLVNEONROC
P/E -164.2x 1.4x -17.4x
P/FCF -2,418x -1.0x -11.3x
P/Operating cash flow 30.9x -1.0x -11.3x
P/S 5.0x 5.7x 4.4x
P/B 7.2x 0.6x 3.9x
P/Tangible book 7.2x 0.6x 3.9x
EV/EBITDA -100.9x -1.4x -15.4x
EV/EBIT -23.2x -1.4x -14.5x
EV/Revenue 4.8x -4.8x 3.7x
EV/FCF -2,323x 0.9x -9.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 29.7x 0.9x -9.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.39 0.03 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEVLVNEONROC
Revenue growth (1Y) 41.7% -21.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 31.0% -28.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 25.9% -19.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 95.6% -25.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 49.1% 200.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.1% 48.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 94.1% 228.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 66.8% 53.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 94.6% 228.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 68.8% 52.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 334.7% -100.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 42.6% -42.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 98.1% -101.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 83.1% -42.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEVLVNEONROC
Gross margin 49.9% 98.8% 82.9%
EBITDA margin -4.8% 348.6% -23.8%
Operating margin -20.8% 345.6% -25.2%
Pretax margin -3.1% 383.2% -25.8%
Net margin -3.0% 398.1% -25.4%
FCF margin -0.2% -552.8% -39.1%
Operating cash flow margin 16.2% -548.4% -39.1%
Return on equity -4.4% 37.2% -22.2%
Return on assets -1.7% 33.5% -18.0%
Return on invested capital -23.8% – –
Return on capital employed -20.2% 31.8% -21.0%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.1x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -5.3x -1.4x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 13.5% – 4.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEVLVNEONROC
Debt / assets 9.5% – –
Debt / equity 0.2x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 4.1x – –
Debt / FCF -80.7x – –
Liabilities / assets 60.6% 12.2% 18.9%
Equity / assets 39.4% 87.8% 81.1%
Interest coverage -9.7x – –
Current ratio 1.2x 10.9x 5.4x
Quick ratio 0.8x 10.6x 5.2x
Cash ratio 0.5x 10.3x 3.5x
Altman Z-score 1.22 -8.49 10.45

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEVLVNEONROC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.6% – –
Shareholder yield -0.6% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEVLVNEONROC
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.09FY2026 $-0.37FY2026 $-0.31FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -177.1%FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $193.69MFY2026 $3.71MFY2026 $19.28MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +32.7%FY2026 +76.7%FY2026 +13.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.3% +26.8% +76.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEVLVNEONROC
Held by institutions 67.2% 11.6% –
Institutions holding 257 51 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.2% -35.0% –
Institutions buying 133 25 –
Institutions selling 68 24 –
Buyers to sellers 1.96 1.04 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EVLVNEONROC
EVLV 1.00 0.25 0.05
NEON 0.25 1.00 0.01
ROC 0.05 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EVLV, NEON and ROC?

Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) $863.60M, Neonode (NEON) $11.75M, Rank One Computing (ROC) $68.50M.

Which company is growing faster?

Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) +41.7%, Neonode (NEON) -21.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Neonode (NEON) has the highest net margin (Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) -3.0%, Neonode (NEON) 398.1%, Rank One Computing (ROC) -25.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) returned the most: Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) -41.6%, Neonode (NEON) -78.5%. Over five years, Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) compounded fastest (Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) -3.5%/yr, Neonode (NEON) -40.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) has been the steadiest (Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) 51.4%, Neonode (NEON) 73.0%, Rank One Computing (ROC) 72.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EVLV, NEON and ROC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.