EUDA vs FMS vs SY Stock Comparison

EUDA Health Holdings, Fresenius Medical Care AG and So-Young International Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FMS Fresenius Medical Care AG
$22.50 -0.8% 1M -17.3% 1Y
Market cap
$12.57B
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.07B
Div. yield
3.82%
Healthcare Services Healthcare
7 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Fresenius Medical Care AG leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Fresenius Medical Care AG 7, So-Young International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEUDAFMSSYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.79M $12.57B $32.22M FMS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 12.0x -0.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.7x 9.5x — FMS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -47.8% +30.4% SY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 9.9% -13.6% FMS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 200.7x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 3.82% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -66.6% -17.3% -33.0% FMS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -8.3%/yr -11.6%/yr FMS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 169.9% 31.1% 78.5% FMS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 51/100 40/100 FMS

Percentile Scorecard

EUDAFMSSY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEUDAFMSSY
Valuation – 71 #27 of 92 –
Growth – 12 #77 of 87 31 #60 of 87
Profitability – 64 #32 of 86 25 #65 of 86
Financial Health 68 #32 of 97 14 #84 of 97 63 #37 of 97
Shareholder Returns – 93 #5 of 56 –
Overall – 51 40
  • EUDA ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • FMS ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • SY ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEUDAFMSSYSPY
1 month -17.7%-0.8%-22.6% -0.2%
3 months -26.1%-9.1%+6.6% +3.9%
6 months +22.5%0.0%-26.9% +8.2%
Year to date -68.2%-5.5%-18.4% +12.9%
1 year -66.6%-17.3%-33.0% +12.3%
3 years +8.9%+37.2%+124.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year +2.9%+11.1%+31.0% +23.3%
5 years —-35.2%-46.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-8.3%-11.6% +10.9%
10 years —-44.4%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —-5.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEUDAFMSSYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 169.9%31.1%78.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 170.1%36.8%82.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.020.191.65 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.39-0.56-0.42 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.4%-63.9%-89.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -78.6%-17.3%-53.2% -1.2%
52-week high $68.60$27.20$4.47 $779.14
52-week low $5.26$20.19$1.32 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEUDAFMSSY
P/E now vs peer median —median 24.6x 12.0xmedian 24.6x -0.5xmedian 24.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.6x 1.1xmedian 1.6x 0.1xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.6x 205.4xmedian 14.6x —median 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 21.6x 6.0xmedian 21.6x —median 21.6x
P/B now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 3.2x 0.8xmedian 3.2x —median 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.66 0.57median 0.66 0.00median 0.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEUDAFMSSY
Revenue – $11.07B $257.40M
Gross profit – -$5.62B $114.17M
Operating income – $879.32M -$42.62M
Net income – $1.38B -$36.35M
Free cash flow – $2.08B –
R&D – $180.01M $17.58M
EPS (diluted) – $1.79 $-4.50
Cash & equivalents $365.90K $1.21B $65.23M
Total debt $4.70M $572.99B $45.32M
Shares (diluted) 1.87M 612.52M 7.79M
Enterprise value $26.63M $5.64B -$446.58M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEUDAFMSSY
P/E – 12.0x -0.5x
P/FCF – 6.0x –
P/Operating cash flow – 3.8x –
P/S – 1.1x 0.1x
P/B 4.7x 0.8x –
P/Tangible book -17.5x 0.9x –
EV/EBITDA – 205.4x –
EV/EBIT – 628.2x 1.6x
EV/Revenue – 49.9x -0.3x
EV/FCF – 265.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 167.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.57 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEUDAFMSSY
Revenue growth (1Y) – -47.8% 30.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -18.6% 9.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -207.2% 4.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -45.2% -4.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -45.5% 54.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -16.4% -101.3%
Net income growth (1Y) – 49.8% 59.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 18.2% -140.0%
EPS growth (1Y) – 52.0% 60.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 20.9% -149.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 9.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -7.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 4.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEUDAFMSSY
Gross margin – -50.7% 44.4%
EBITDA margin – 24.3% –
Operating margin – 7.9% -16.6%
Pretax margin – 15.8% -14.3%
Net margin – 9.9% -13.6%
FCF margin – 18.8% –
Operating cash flow margin – 29.8% –
Return on equity – 2.7% –
Return on assets – 1.2% -9.3%
Return on invested capital – 0.2% –
Return on capital employed – 3.2% -16.6%
Asset turnover – 0.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.4x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEUDAFMSSY
Debt / assets 0.1% 1,515% 4.2%
Debt / equity 0.0x 35.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 200.7x –
Debt / FCF – 260.4x –
Liabilities / assets 38.3% 56.8% 41.2%
Equity / assets 61.7% 43.2% –
Interest coverage – 2.0x –
Current ratio 2.5x 1.1x 1.6x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.2x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 0.9x
Altman Z-score – 1.32 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEUDAFMSSY
Dividend yield – 3.8% –
Net buyback yield – 8.6% –
Shareholder yield – 12.4% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEUDAFMSSY
Forward P/E 9.7xFY2026 9.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.51FY2026 $2.37FY2026 $-0.24FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +277.5%FY2026 -6.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +7.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.92MFY2026 $21.50BFY2026 $317.51MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +183.6%FY2026 -7.0%FY2026 +45.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.3% +37.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEUDAFMSSY
Held by institutions – 7.3% 53.2%
Institutions holding – 235 25
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.9% -13.6%
Institutions buying – 151 10
Institutions selling – 41 9
Buyers to sellers – 3.68 1.11

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EUDAFMSSY
EUDA 1.00 -0.04 0.05
FMS -0.04 1.00 -0.01
SY 0.05 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EUDA, FMS and SY?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) is the largest by market capitalisation: EUDA Health Holdings (EUDA) $27.79M, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) $12.57B, So-Young International (SY) $32.22M.

Which company is growing faster?

So-Young International (SY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -47.8%, So-Young International (SY) +30.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has the highest net margin (Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 9.9%, So-Young International (SY) -13.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) returned the most: EUDA Health Holdings (EUDA) -66.6%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -17.3%, So-Young International (SY) -33.0%. Over five years, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) compounded fastest (Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -8.3%/yr, So-Young International (SY) -11.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 3.82%, So-Young International (SY) 0.00%. EUDA Health Holdings (EUDA) and So-Young International (SY) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has been the steadiest (EUDA Health Holdings (EUDA) 169.9%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 31.1%, So-Young International (SY) 78.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EUDA, FMS and SY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.