EUDA vs FMS vs RDNT Stock Comparison

EUDA Health Holdings, Fresenius Medical Care AG and RadNet Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FMS Fresenius Medical Care AG
$22.76 +0.4% 1M -16.4% 1Y
Market cap
$13.10B
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.07B
Div. yield
–
Healthcare Services Healthcare
4 wins
RDNT RadNet, Inc.
$70.05 -1.0% 1M -16.0% 1Y
Market cap
$5.72B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.27B
Div. yield
–
Healthcare Services Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

RadNet leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (RadNet 5, Fresenius Medical Care AG 4, EUDA Health Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEUDAFMSRDNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.31M $13.10B $5.72B FMS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 12.0x -270.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.4x 9.6x 132.2x EUDA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -47.8% +18.9% RDNT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 9.9% -0.9% FMS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.2% 1.5% RDNT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 200.7x 2.5x RDNT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -69.8% -16.4% -16.0% RDNT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -8.0%/yr +18.4%/yr RDNT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 170.2% 31.1% 42.1% FMS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 50/100 39/100 FMS

Percentile Scorecard

EUDAFMSRDNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEUDAFMSRDNT
Valuation – 72 #27 of 93 40 #56 of 93
Growth – 12 #78 of 88 22 #69 of 88
Profitability – 62 #34 of 87 45 #48 of 87
Financial Health 70 #31 of 100 13 #87 of 100 43 #57 of 100
Shareholder Returns – 91 #6 of 56 42 #33 of 56
Overall – 50 39
  • EUDA ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • FMS ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • RDNT ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEUDAFMSRDNTSPY
1 month -20.3%+0.4%-1.0% -0.8%
3 months -25.1%-8.5%+13.9% +3.5%
6 months +10.7%+0.6%+21.3% +7.0%
Year to date -69.2%-4.5%-1.8% +12.2%
1 year -69.8%-16.4%-16.0% +13.0%
3 years +5.5%+38.8%+175.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +1.8%+11.6%+40.2% +23.1%
5 years —-33.9%+132.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-8.0%+18.4% +11.0%
10 years —-43.7%+872.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-5.6%+25.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureEUDAFMSRDNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 170.2%31.1%42.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 170.1%37.0%42.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.040.201.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.41-0.53-0.38 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.4%-63.9%-56.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -79.2%-16.3%-17.1% -1.8%
52-week high $68.60$27.20$84.48 $779.14
52-week low $5.26$20.19$51.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEUDAFMSRDNT
P/E now vs peer median —median 25.1x 12.1xmedian 25.1x -258.1xmedian 25.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.6x 1.1xmedian 1.6x 2.4xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.5x 205.4xmedian 14.5x 25.1xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 22.4x 6.1xmedian 22.4x -16.0xmedian 22.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 3.1x 0.8xmedian 3.1x 4.0xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.66 0.58median 0.66 31.52median 0.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEUDAFMSRDNT
Revenue – $11.07B $2.27B
Gross profit – -$5.62B $261.62M
Operating income – $879.32M $70.78M
Net income – $1.38B $80.00K
Free cash flow – $2.08B -$344.77M
R&D – $180.01M –
EPS (diluted) – $1.79 $-0.27
Cash & equivalents $365.90K $1.21B $726.27M
Total debt $4.70M $572.99B $1.33B
Shares (diluted) 1.87M 612.52M 78.73M
Enterprise value $26.16M $5.05B $2.97B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEUDAFMSRDNT
P/E – 12.1x -258.1x
P/FCF – 6.1x -16.0x
P/Operating cash flow – 3.9x 17.8x
P/S – 1.1x 2.4x
P/B 4.5x 0.8x 4.0x
P/Tangible book -17.0x 0.9x 4.8x
EV/EBITDA – 205.4x 25.1x
EV/EBIT – 628.4x 86.4x
EV/Revenue – 49.9x 2.7x
EV/FCF – 265.7x -17.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – 167.5x 19.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.58 31.52

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEUDAFMSRDNT
Revenue growth (1Y) – -47.8% 18.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -18.6% 14.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -207.2% 17.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -45.2% 11.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -45.5% 8.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -16.4% 5.9%
Net income growth (1Y) – 49.8% -99.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 18.2% -74.7%
EPS growth (1Y) – 52.0% -35.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 20.9% -8.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 9.3% 18.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.3% 19.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -7.7% -1,140%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 4.8% -66.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEUDAFMSRDNT
Gross margin – -50.7% 11.5%
EBITDA margin – 24.3% 10.7%
Operating margin – 7.9% 3.1%
Pretax margin – 15.8% 1.5%
Net margin – 9.9% -0.9%
FCF margin – 18.8% -15.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 29.8% 13.7%
Return on equity – 2.7% 1.4%
Return on assets – 1.2% 0.5%
Return on invested capital – 0.2% 1.5%
Return on capital employed – 3.2% 2.1%
Asset turnover – 0.3x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.4x 3,876x
Stock comp / revenue – – 2.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEUDAFMSRDNT
Debt / assets 0.1% 1,515% 31.5%
Debt / equity 0.0x 35.0x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 200.7x 2.5x
Debt / FCF – 260.4x -3.9x
Liabilities / assets 38.3% 56.8% 67.0%
Equity / assets 61.7% 43.2% 33.0%
Interest coverage – 2.0x 1.0x
Current ratio 2.5x 1.1x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.2x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 1.0x
Altman Z-score – 1.33 1.81

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEUDAFMSRDNT
Dividend yield – 3.8% –
Net buyback yield – 8.5% -0.1%
Shareholder yield – 12.3% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEUDAFMSRDNT
Forward P/E 9.4xFY2026 9.6xFY2026 132.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.51FY2026 $2.37FY2026 $0.53FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +277.5%FY2026 -6.0%FY2026 +35.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +7.6% +71.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.92MFY2026 $21.50BFY2026 $2.68BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +183.6%FY2026 -7.0%FY2026 +31.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.3% -1.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEUDAFMSRDNT
Held by institutions – 7.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 235 328
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.9% +6.0%
Institutions buying – 151 175
Institutions selling – 41 110
Buyers to sellers – 3.68 1.59

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EUDAFMSRDNT
EUDA 1.00 -0.04 -0.03
FMS -0.04 1.00 0.08
RDNT -0.03 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EUDA, FMS and RDNT?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) is the largest by market capitalisation: EUDA Health Holdings (EUDA) $27.31M, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) $13.10B, RadNet (RDNT) $5.72B.

Which company is growing faster?

RadNet (RDNT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -47.8%, RadNet (RDNT) +18.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has the highest net margin (Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 9.9%, RadNet (RDNT) -0.9%). On return on invested capital, RadNet (RDNT) leads (Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 0.2%, RadNet (RDNT) 1.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year RadNet (RDNT) returned the most: EUDA Health Holdings (EUDA) -69.8%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -16.4%, RadNet (RDNT) -16.0%. Over five years, RadNet (RDNT) compounded fastest (Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -8.0%/yr, RadNet (RDNT) +18.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has been the steadiest (EUDA Health Holdings (EUDA) 170.2%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 31.1%, RadNet (RDNT) 42.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EUDA, FMS and RDNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, RadNet (RDNT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.