EUBG vs RAMP vs ZETA Stock Comparison

Entrepreneur Universe Bright, LiveRamp Holdings and Zeta Global Holdings Prices as of Oct 30, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RAMP LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
$38.50 +2.6% 1M +40.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.34B
P/E
15.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$832.10M
Div. yield
–
Marketing Software Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Zeta Global Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Zeta Global Holdings 4, LiveRamp Holdings 4, Entrepreneur Universe Bright 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEUBGRAMPZETALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $40.83M $2.34B $6.92B ZETA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.4x 15.0x -3,452x RAMP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 12.5x 29.9x RAMP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.3% +8.9% +35.9% ZETA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.5% 18.7% -0.1% EUBG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 0.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — -1.0x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -83.1% +40.9% +69.6% ZETA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -43.3%/yr -6.4%/yr +27.7%/yr ZETA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 167.2% 37.0% 64.9% RAMP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 84/100 61/100 RAMP

Percentile Scorecard

EUBGRAMPZETA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEUBGRAMPZETA
Valuation 59 #42 of 100 91 #10 of 100 37 #63 of 100
Growth 45 #54 of 97 87 #14 of 97 99 #2 of 97
Profitability 93 #8 of 94 74 #25 of 94 50 #48 of 94
Financial Health 99 #2 of 111 93 #9 of 111 86 #17 of 111
Shareholder Returns – 78 #15 of 64 32 #44 of 64
Overall 74 84 61
  • EUBG ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • RAMP ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • ZETA ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEUBGRAMPZETASPY
1 month -27.3%+2.6%-6.5% -2.3%
3 months -44.2%+1.6%+35.2% -0.7%
6 months -46.7%+27.4%+65.3% +4.8%
Year to date -78.2%+31.1%+50.0% +10.3%
1 year -83.1%+40.9%+69.6% +10.3%
3 years -94.3%+39.2%+261.2% +73.0%
3 years, per year -61.5%+11.7%+53.5% +20.1%
5 years -94.1%-28.1%+239.1% +61.9%
5 years, per year -43.3%-6.4%+27.7% +10.1%
10 years +2,300.0%+62.0%— +258.6%
10 years, per year +37.4%+4.9%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureEUBGRAMPZETASPY
Volatility, 1Y 167.2%37.0%64.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 285.0%29.8%59.7% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.030.352.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.501.101.07 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.1%-72.7%-70.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -84.3%0.0%-10.6% -3.5%
52-week high $1.53$38.50$34.12 $779.14
52-week low $0.20$22.42$14.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEUBGRAMPZETA
P/E now vs peer median 30.4xmedian 28.5x 15.0xmedian 28.5x -3,452xmedian 28.5x
P/S now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 2.8x 2.8xmedian 2.8x 4.4xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 16.8x 17.9xmedian 16.8x 63.1xmedian 16.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.6xmedian 16.2x 11.8xmedian 16.2x 30.8xmedian 16.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 2.9x 2.4xmedian 2.9x 7.5xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.14median 0.90 0.27median 0.90 -42.02median 0.90

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEUBGRAMPZETA
Revenue $5.06M $832.10M $1.57B
Gross profit $4.41M $589.26M $934.32M
Operating income $2.10M $96.41M $24.68M
Net income $1.34M $155.72M -$2.17M
Free cash flow $1.53M $198.85M $224.41M
R&D – $145.67M $146.97M
EPS (diluted) $0.01 $2.52 $-0.01
Cash & equivalents $10.67M $363.52M $309.95M
Total debt – – $197.48M
Shares (diluted) 170.12M 61.85M 256.58M
Enterprise value -$1.02M $802.20M $5.62B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEUBGRAMPZETA
P/E 30.4x 15.0x -3,452x
P/FCF 26.6x 11.8x 30.8x
P/Operating cash flow 25.9x 11.7x 28.7x
P/S 8.1x 2.8x 4.4x
P/B 3.9x 2.4x 7.5x
P/Tangible book 3.9x 2.4x 9.3x
EV/EBITDA 14.1x 17.9x 63.1x
EV/EBIT 14.3x 20.4x 275.9x
EV/Revenue 6.0x 2.4x 4.3x
EV/FCF 19.7x 9.9x 30.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.1x 9.8x 28.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.14 0.27 -42.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEUBGRAMPZETA
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.3% 8.9% 35.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.3% 11.0% 33.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.2% 8.7% 32.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.4% 10.8% 30.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -1.9% 439.4% 192.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.6% 44.0% 28.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -2.2% 979.7% 94.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.6% 54.3% 78.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 878.3% 1,065% 95.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 212.9% 56.0% 82.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.5% 36.0% 55.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 29.4% 29.0% 42.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 22.0% 35.9% 64.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.4% 30.0% 52.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEUBGRAMPZETA
Gross margin 87.1% 70.8% 59.5%
EBITDA margin 42.1% 13.2% 6.9%
Operating margin 41.5% 11.6% 1.6%
Pretax margin 49.6% 13.3% -0.6%
Net margin 26.5% 18.7% -0.1%
FCF margin 30.3% 23.9% 14.3%
Operating cash flow margin 31.2% 24.1% 15.3%
Return on equity 12.7% 16.0% -0.2%
Return on assets 11.5% 12.1% -0.1%
Return on invested capital – – 0.5%
Return on capital employed 19.2% 9.2% 2.1%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.6x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.3x -111.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 9.4% 12.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEUBGRAMPZETA
Debt / assets – – 13.5%
Debt / equity – – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – -1.0x
Debt / FCF – – 0.9x
Liabilities / assets 10.1% 23.6% 36.9%
Equity / assets 89.9% 76.4% 63.1%
Interest coverage – – 16.1x
Current ratio 14.9x 2.7x 2.4x
Quick ratio 14.6x 2.5x 2.3x
Cash ratio 14.2x 1.6x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 23.27 7.55 8.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEUBGRAMPZETA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 7.6% 1.6%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 7.6% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEUBGRAMPZETA
Forward P/E – 12.5xFY2026 29.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.07FY2026 $1.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +35.2%FY2026 +39.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +11.1% +23.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $843.08MFY2026 $1.93BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +3.7%FY2026 +48.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +8.2% +3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEUBGRAMPZETA
Held by institutions – 100.0% 82.6%
Institutions holding – 308 414
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.5% +3.9%
Institutions buying – 165 246
Institutions selling – 106 117
Buyers to sellers – 1.56 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EUBGRAMPZETA
EUBG 1.00 -0.01 -0.07
RAMP -0.01 1.00 0.44
ZETA -0.07 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EUBG, RAMP and ZETA?

Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Entrepreneur Universe Bright (EUBG) $40.83M, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) $2.34B, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) $6.92B.

Which stock is cheaper, EUBG, RAMP and ZETA?

LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Entrepreneur Universe Bright (EUBG) 30.4x, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 15.0x, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) -3,452x). On next year's consensus earnings, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) is cheapest (LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 12.5x, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) 29.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Entrepreneur Universe Bright (EUBG) +4.3%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) +8.9%, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) +35.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Entrepreneur Universe Bright (EUBG) has the highest net margin (Entrepreneur Universe Bright (EUBG) 26.5%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 18.7%, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) -0.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) returned the most: Entrepreneur Universe Bright (EUBG) -83.1%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) +40.9%, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) +69.6%. Over five years, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) compounded fastest (Entrepreneur Universe Bright (EUBG) -43.3%/yr, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) -6.4%/yr, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) +27.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) has been the steadiest (Entrepreneur Universe Bright (EUBG) 167.2%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 37.0%, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) 64.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EUBG, RAMP and ZETA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.