ETN vs TSLA vs HUBB Stock Comparison

Eaton, Tesla and Hubbell Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ETN Eaton Corp plc
$371.81 -15.5% 1M -1.2% 1Y
Market cap
$149.20B
P/E
39.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.03B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
1 win
TSLA Tesla, Inc.
$391.62 +5.2% 1M -9.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.32T
P/E
346.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$103.62B
Div. yield
–
Auto Manufacturers Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
HUBB Hubbell Inc
$459.62 -1.4% 1M +5.8% 1Y
Market cap
$23.36B
P/E
25.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.22B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Hubbell leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Hubbell 8, Tesla 2, Eaton 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionETNTSLAHUBBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $149.20B $1.32T $23.36B TSLA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.0x 346.6x 25.9x HUBB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.8x 243.2x 22.9x HUBB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.5% +11.8% +10.6% ETN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.8% 3.7% 14.5% HUBB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.3% 3.4% 12.8% HUBB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x -3.2x 3.3x TSLA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.2% -9.7% +5.8% HUBB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.4%/yr +2.5%/yr +19.3%/yr HUBB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.6% 45.7% 32.2% HUBB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 52/100 54/100 HUBB

Percentile Scorecard

ETNTSLAHUBB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisETNTSLAHUBB
Valuation 14 #174 of 203 16 #42 of 50 31 #140 of 203
Growth 73 #51 of 187 49 #25 of 48 67 #62 of 187
Profitability 75 #47 of 185 80 #10 of 46 89 #21 of 185
Financial Health 20 #175 of 219 96 #3 of 52 14 #189 of 219
Shareholder Returns 45 #85 of 153 21 #24 of 30 66 #52 of 153
Overall 45 52 54
  • ETN ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • TSLA ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • HUBB ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodETNTSLAHUBBSPY
1 month -15.5%+5.2%-1.4% -0.8%
3 months -6.7%+26.6%-7.7% +3.5%
6 months -10.8%+3.4%-17.2% +7.0%
Year to date +16.7%-12.9%+3.5% +12.2%
1 year -1.2%-9.7%+5.8% +13.0%
3 years +90.4%+88.9%+63.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +24.0%+23.6%+17.8% +23.1%
5 years +132.2%+13.2%+141.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +18.4%+2.5%+19.3% +11.0%
10 years +479.1%+2,805.2%+336.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year +19.2%+40.1%+15.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureETNTSLAHUBBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.6%45.7%32.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.6%47.9%34.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.862.261.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.03-0.210.18 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.7%-73.6%-33.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.2%-20.1%-17.6% -1.8%
52-week high $459.94$489.88$557.85 $779.14
52-week low $315.82$298.32$407.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleETNTSLAHUBB
P/E now vs peer median 37.7xmedian 26.0x 333.2xmedian 18.9x 27.0xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 1.9x 12.2xmedian 0.5x 3.9xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 25.3xmedian 14.0x 113.7xmedian 8.2x 19.6xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 36.7xmedian 21.4x 220.0xmedian 9.4x 26.9xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 2.2x 14.5xmedian 0.9x 6.2xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.84median 1.26 -10.23median 1.40 2.04median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsETNTSLAHUBB
Revenue $30.03B $103.62B $6.22B
Gross profit $10.78B $19.53B $2.19B
Operating income $5.32B $4.37B $1.25B
Net income $3.83B $3.86B $907.10M
Free cash flow $3.93B $5.76B $901.40M
R&D $844.00M $7.73B –
EPS (diluted) $9.83 $1.07 $16.98
Cash & equivalents $483.00M $15.22B $378.60M
Total debt $20.61B $9.34B $11.71B
Shares (diluted) 389.50M 3.54B 53.10M
Enterprise value $146.38B $1.14T $21.27B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricETNTSLAHUBB
P/E 37.7x 333.2x 27.0x
P/FCF 36.7x 220.0x 26.9x
P/Operating cash flow 29.2x 67.8x 22.7x
P/S 4.8x 12.2x 3.9x
P/B 7.1x 14.5x 6.2x
P/Tangible book 18.8x 14.6x 33.1x
EV/EBITDA 25.3x 113.7x 19.6x
EV/EBIT 30.9x 282.1x 23.3x
EV/Revenue 5.5x 11.9x 4.7x
EV/FCF 41.8x 214.1x 32.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 33.2x 66.0x 27.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.84 -10.23 2.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricETNTSLAHUBB
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.5% 11.8% 10.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.8% 3.3% 6.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.7% 20.5% 12.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 12.3% -1.1% 8.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.7% -22.2% 10.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 15.9% -29.8% 11.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -2.4% -35.0% 8.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.2% -32.0% 12.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.0% -35.7% 9.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 13.3% -32.6% 13.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 21.9% 18.5% 11.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.1% 10.2% 10.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 20.1% 3.2% 14.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.3% -2.2% 11.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricETNTSLAHUBB
Gross margin 35.9% 18.9% 35.2%
EBITDA margin 21.7% 10.5% 24.0%
Operating margin 17.7% 4.2% 20.2%
Pretax margin 16.1% 5.0% 18.2%
Net margin 12.8% 3.7% 14.5%
FCF margin 13.1% 5.6% 14.5%
Operating cash flow margin 16.5% 18.0% 17.2%
Return on equity 19.1% 4.5% 23.6%
Return on assets 6.9% 2.6% 9.0%
Return on invested capital 10.3% 3.4% 12.8%
Return on capital employed 12.2% 3.9% 15.2%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 4.8x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 3.7% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricETNTSLAHUBB
Debt / assets 36.7% 6.3% 45.4%
Debt / equity 1.0x 0.1x 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x -3.2x 3.3x
Debt / FCF 5.2x 1.6x 6.0x
Liabilities / assets 63.9% 41.1% 66.9%
Equity / assets 36.1% 58.9% 33.1%
Interest coverage 12.0x 13.1x –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.9x 1.6x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.3x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 3.61 13.90 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricETNTSLAHUBB
Dividend yield 1.2% – 1.2%
Net buyback yield 0.4% -0.1% 0.8%
Shareholder yield 1.5% -0.1% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusETNTSLAHUBB
Forward P/E 26.8xFY2026 243.2xFY2026 22.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.88FY2026 $1.61FY2026 $20.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +15.0%FY2026 -3.0%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +14.4% +32.3% +21.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $31.83BFY2026 $112.97BFY2026 $7.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.0%FY2026 +19.1%FY2026 +25.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +21.7% +15.2% +9.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersETNTSLAHUBB
Held by institutions 84.7% 42.6% 96.1%
Institutions holding 2,640 4,260 1,014
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% +7.4% -0.4%
Institutions buying 1,398 2,372 511
Institutions selling 891 1,356 317
Buyers to sellers 1.57 1.75 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ETNTSLAHUBB
ETN 1.00 0.36 0.64
TSLA 0.36 1.00 0.24
HUBB 0.64 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ETN, TSLA and HUBB?

Tesla (TSLA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Eaton (ETN) $149.20B, Tesla (TSLA) $1.32T, Hubbell (HUBB) $23.36B.

Which stock is cheaper, ETN, TSLA and HUBB?

Hubbell (HUBB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Eaton (ETN) 39.0x, Tesla (TSLA) 346.6x, Hubbell (HUBB) 25.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Hubbell (HUBB) is cheapest (Eaton (ETN) 26.8x, Tesla (TSLA) 243.2x, Hubbell (HUBB) 22.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Eaton (ETN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Eaton (ETN) +15.5%, Tesla (TSLA) +11.8%, Hubbell (HUBB) +10.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hubbell (HUBB) has the highest net margin (Eaton (ETN) 12.8%, Tesla (TSLA) 3.7%, Hubbell (HUBB) 14.5%). On return on invested capital, Hubbell (HUBB) leads (Eaton (ETN) 10.3%, Tesla (TSLA) 3.4%, Hubbell (HUBB) 12.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hubbell (HUBB) returned the most: Eaton (ETN) -1.2%, Tesla (TSLA) -9.7%, Hubbell (HUBB) +5.8%. Over five years, Hubbell (HUBB) compounded fastest (Eaton (ETN) +18.4%/yr, Tesla (TSLA) +2.5%/yr, Hubbell (HUBB) +19.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hubbell (HUBB) has been the steadiest (Eaton (ETN) 40.6%, Tesla (TSLA) 45.7%, Hubbell (HUBB) 32.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ETN, TSLA and HUBB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hubbell (HUBB) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.