ETD vs LZB vs MLKN Stock Comparison

Ethan Allen Interiors, La-Z-Boy and Millerknoll Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ETD Ethan Allen Interiors Inc
$20.06 -5.8% 1M -27.3% 1Y
Market cap
$508.86M
P/E
12.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$579.49M
Div. yield
–
Furniture Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
LZB La-Z-Boy Inc
$29.62 -0.9% 1M -9.5% 1Y
Market cap
$1.19B
P/E
14.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.11B
Div. yield
0.03%
Furniture Consumer Discretionary
1 win
MLKN Millerknoll, Inc.
$21.07 +5.0% 1M +20.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.44B
P/E
14.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.81B
Div. yield
–
Furniture Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Millerknoll leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Millerknoll 4, Ethan Allen Interiors 4, La-Z-Boy 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionETDLZBMLKNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $508.86M $1.19B $1.44B MLKN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.8x 14.6x 14.7x ETD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.4x 12.1x 10.0x MLKN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -5.7% +0.2% +1.2% MLKN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.9% 3.9% 2.6% ETD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 5.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.7x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -27.3% -9.5% +20.7% MLKN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.7%/yr -2.1%/yr -11.0%/yr LZB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.7% 43.3% 48.9% ETD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 66/100 62/100 ETD

Percentile Scorecard

ETDLZBMLKN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisETDLZBMLKN
Valuation 85 #7 of 42 93 #4 of 42 83 #8 of 42
Growth 15 #36 of 42 27 #31 of 42 71 #13 of 42
Profitability 80 #9 of 40 72 #12 of 40 64 #15 of 40
Financial Health 76 #11 of 43 57 #19 of 43 31 #30 of 43
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 28 82 #6 of 28 59 #12 of 28
Overall 71 66 62
  • ETD ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • LZB ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • MLKN ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodETDLZBMLKNSPY
1 month -5.8%-0.9%+5.0% -0.8%
3 months -13.9%-26.6%-6.6% +3.5%
6 months -11.3%-17.6%+22.7% +7.0%
Year to date -12.2%-20.5%+15.3% +12.2%
1 year -27.3%-9.5%+20.7% +13.0%
3 years -22.6%+5.0%-6.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year -8.2%+1.6%-2.3% +23.1%
5 years -12.6%-10.2%-44.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -2.7%-2.1%-11.0% +11.0%
10 years -34.4%+29.9%-25.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year -4.1%+2.7%-2.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureETDLZBMLKNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.7%43.3%48.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.1%39.0%53.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.420.471.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.83-0.220.42 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -47.6%-41.6%-67.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.8%-29.8%-14.0% -1.8%
52-week high $28.19$42.17$24.49 $779.14
52-week low $18.68$28.67$13.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleETDLZBMLKN
P/E now vs peer median 12.8xmedian 16.1x 14.5xmedian 16.1x 14.9xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.7x 0.6xmedian 0.7x 0.4xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.2xmedian 12.1x 6.0xmedian 12.1x 6.2xmedian 12.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.2xmedian 11.9x 11.6xmedian 11.9x 12.5xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 1.2xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.46median 0.64 -1.03median 0.64 0.31median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsETDLZBMLKN
Revenue $579.49M $2.11B $3.81B
Gross profit $354.77M $936.07M $1.51B
Operating income $45.02M $105.12M $196.60M
Net income $39.88M $82.32M $101.20M
Free cash flow $41.44M $102.33M $115.50M
R&D – – $105.00M
EPS (diluted) $1.56 $2.04 $1.40
Cash & equivalents $73.63M $267.25M $178.60M
Total debt – – $1.31B
Shares (diluted) 25.58M 40.00M 70.04M
Enterprise value $6.10M -$26.42M $740.60M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricETDLZBMLKN
P/E 12.8x 14.5x 14.9x
P/FCF 12.2x 11.6x 12.5x
P/Operating cash flow 9.6x 6.5x 6.0x
P/S 0.9x 0.6x 0.4x
P/B 1.1x 1.2x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 1.3x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 6.2x 6.0x 6.2x
EV/EBIT 8.3x 8.7x 13.1x
EV/Revenue 0.6x 0.4x 0.7x
EV/FCF 9.0x 9.0x 22.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.1x 5.0x 10.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.46 -1.03 0.31

Growth

14 metrics
MetricETDLZBMLKN
Revenue growth (1Y) -5.7% 0.2% 1.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -9.9% -1.8% -1.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.7% 1.5% 3.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -9.6% -0.1% 2.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -27.4% -16.2% 121.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -31.0% -18.4% 20.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -22.7% -11.0% 681.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -27.8% -16.4% 44.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -22.6% -7.9% 724.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -27.7% -14.2% 47.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -14.9% 7.1% 21.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -19.5% -2.5% -12.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -17.8% 8.7% 41.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -21.8% -9.2% -24.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricETDLZBMLKN
Gross margin 61.2% 44.4% 39.5%
EBITDA margin 10.4% 7.3% 10.9%
Operating margin 7.8% 5.0% 5.2%
Pretax margin 9.2% 5.2% 3.5%
Net margin 6.9% 3.9% 2.6%
FCF margin 7.2% 4.8% 3.0%
Operating cash flow margin 9.1% 8.7% 6.3%
Return on equity 8.4% 7.9% 7.6%
Return on assets 5.5% 4.1% 2.6%
Return on invested capital – – 5.6%
Return on capital employed 7.9% 6.7% 5.9%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.0x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 2.2x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.7% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricETDLZBMLKN
Debt / assets – – 32.7%
Debt / equity – – 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.7x
Debt / FCF – – 11.3x
Liabilities / assets 34.5% 48.6% 66.1%
Equity / assets 65.5% 51.4% 33.9%
Interest coverage 198.3x 169.3x 2.9x
Current ratio 2.1x 1.7x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.0x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.6x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 4.01 2.55 1.83

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricETDLZBMLKN
Dividend yield 22.0% 3.2% 3.6%
Net buyback yield – 5.2% 0.7%
Shareholder yield 22.0% 8.5% 4.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 46.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 37.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 8.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusETDLZBMLKN
Forward P/E 17.4xFY2027 12.1xFY2026 10.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.15FY2027 $2.45FY2026 $2.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -28.6%FY2027 -19.4%FY2026 +12.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.4% +22.0% +11.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $533.76MFY2027 $2.22BFY2026 $3.72BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.9%FY2027 +4.3%FY2026 -3.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.2% -7.4% +17.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersETDLZBMLKN
Held by institutions 84.4% 99.3% 96.5%
Institutions holding 217 269 244
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.0% +0.0% -0.5%
Institutions buying 138 149 121
Institutions selling 54 70 86
Buyers to sellers 2.56 2.13 1.41

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ETDLZBMLKN
ETD 1.00 0.45 0.38
LZB 0.45 1.00 0.32
MLKN 0.38 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ETD, LZB and MLKN?

Millerknoll (MLKN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) $508.86M, La-Z-Boy (LZB) $1.19B, Millerknoll (MLKN) $1.44B.

Which stock is cheaper, ETD, LZB and MLKN?

Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) 12.8x, La-Z-Boy (LZB) 14.6x, Millerknoll (MLKN) 14.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Millerknoll (MLKN) is cheapest (Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) 17.4x, La-Z-Boy (LZB) 12.1x, Millerknoll (MLKN) 10.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Millerknoll (MLKN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) -5.7%, La-Z-Boy (LZB) +0.2%, Millerknoll (MLKN) +1.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) has the highest net margin (Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) 6.9%, La-Z-Boy (LZB) 3.9%, Millerknoll (MLKN) 2.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Millerknoll (MLKN) returned the most: Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) -27.3%, La-Z-Boy (LZB) -9.5%, Millerknoll (MLKN) +20.7%. Over five years, La-Z-Boy (LZB) compounded fastest (Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) -2.7%/yr, La-Z-Boy (LZB) -2.1%/yr, Millerknoll (MLKN) -11.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) 0.00%, La-Z-Boy (LZB) 0.03%, Millerknoll (MLKN) 0.00%. Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) and Millerknoll (MLKN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) has been the steadiest (Ethan Allen Interiors (ETD) 32.7%, La-Z-Boy (LZB) 43.3%, Millerknoll (MLKN) 48.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ETD, LZB and MLKN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Millerknoll (MLKN) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.