ET vs GLNG vs MPC Stock Comparison

Energy Transfer, Golar Lng and Marathon Petroleum Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ET Energy Transfer LP
$20.45 +1.2% 1M +20.9% 1Y
Market cap
$71.27B
P/E
14.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38B
Div. yield
0.07%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
3 wins
GLNG Golar Lng Ltd
$45.64 -8.0% 1M +9.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.72B
P/E
28.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$523.38M
Div. yield
–
LNG and Gas Processing Energy
4 wins
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corp
$435.81 +10.8% 1M +122.1% 1Y
Market cap
$127.52B
P/E
14.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$156.18B
Div. yield
0.01%
Oil Refining Energy
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Marathon Petroleum leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Marathon Petroleum 5, Golar Lng 4, Energy Transfer 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionETGLNGMPCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $71.27B $4.72B $127.52B MPC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.1x 28.8x 14.9x ET
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.4x 41.1x 6.4x MPC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.3% +109.6% +15.9% GLNG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.7% 31.3% 5.5% GLNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.4% 22.6% 19.7% GLNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.0x 5.3x 1.5x MPC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.07% 0.00% 0.01% ET
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.9% +9.9% +122.1% MPC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.1%/yr +28.6%/yr +45.6%/yr MPC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 17.4% 27.2% 36.9% ET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 62/100 59/100 GLNG

Percentile Scorecard

ETGLNGMPC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisETGLNGMPC
Valuation 94 #3 of 35 29 #25 of 35 32 #16 of 23
Growth 61 #14 of 34 91 #4 of 34 67 #7 of 19
Profitability 30 #24 of 34 85 #6 of 34 94 #2 of 18
Financial Health 59 #15 of 35 79 #8 of 35 57 #11 of 24
Shareholder Returns 67 #11 of 31 27 #23 of 31 47 #10 of 18
Overall 62 62 59
  • ET ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • GLNG ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • MPC ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodETGLNGMPCSPY
1 month +1.2%-8.0%+10.8% -0.2%
3 months +1.2%-6.2%+42.4% +3.9%
6 months +5.4%-13.6%+87.4% +8.2%
Year to date +24.0%+22.7%+168.0% +12.9%
1 year +20.9%+9.9%+122.1% +12.3%
3 years +56.0%+103.4%+198.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +16.0%+26.7%+44.0% +23.3%
5 years +111.3%+251.1%+553.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year +16.1%+28.6%+45.6% +10.9%
10 years +33.2%+93.7%+918.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year +2.9%+6.8%+26.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureETGLNGMPCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 17.4%27.2%36.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 16.6%27.3%36.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.210.13-0.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.200.363.31 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -25.8%-34.1%-45.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.9%-20.4%-10.2% -1.2%
52-week high $21.74$57.36$485.05 $779.14
52-week low $16.21$35.33$162.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleETGLNGMPC
P/E now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 20.9x 28.8xmedian 20.9x 14.7xmedian 9.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.7x 8.8xmedian 2.7x 0.8xmedian 0.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 11.0x 19.0xmedian 11.0x 8.5xmedian 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.5xmedian 16.5x 7.9xmedian 16.5x 9.5xmedian 8.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.6x 2.4xmedian 2.6x 4.8xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 2.00median 1.95 1.90median 1.95 -14.33median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsETGLNGMPC
Revenue $107.38B $523.38M $156.18B
Gross profit $25.32B $343.33M $21.79B
Operating income $10.78B $273.22M $14.13B
Net income $7.04B $226.50M $10.31B
Free cash flow $5.22B $583.87M $12.90B
R&D – $14.62M –
EPS (diluted) $1.46 $1.49 $29.50
Cash & equivalents $1.02B $870.50M $7.77B
Total debt $68.41B $2.68B $33.26B
Shares (diluted) 3.46B 109.49M 290.00M
Enterprise value $64.45B $1.08B $111.28B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricETGLNGMPC
P/E 13.9x 28.8x 14.7x
P/FCF 13.5x 7.9x 9.5x
P/Operating cash flow 5.8x 10.9x 7.1x
P/S 0.7x 8.8x 0.8x
P/B 1.4x 2.4x 4.8x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 2.4x 5.3x
EV/EBITDA 8.2x 19.0x 8.5x
EV/EBIT 12.8x 23.5x 10.5x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 12.3x 0.9x
EV/FCF 26.4x 11.0x 11.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.4x 15.2x 8.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.00 1.90 -14.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricETGLNGMPC
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.3% 109.6% 15.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.0% 23.3% -0.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.9% 147.7% 71.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 19.9% -5.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.5% 1,754% 163.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 104.0% -9.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 16.1% 894.0% 174.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 18.5% -10.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.6% 2,539% 324.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.0% 15.2% -1.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 8.8% 1.1% 164.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.9% 11.3% 4.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -8.5% -5.5% 253.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.3% 60.4% 1.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricETGLNGMPC
Gross margin 23.6% 65.6% 14.0%
EBITDA margin 15.7% 64.6% 11.2%
Operating margin 10.0% 52.2% 9.0%
Pretax margin 7.1% 62.0% 8.2%
Net margin 4.7% 31.3% 5.5%
FCF margin 4.9% 111.6% 8.3%
Operating cash flow margin 11.3% 80.8% 11.0%
Return on equity 14.0% 1,387% 42.0%
Return on assets 4.8% 4.2% 11.3%
Return on invested capital 8.4% 22.6% 19.7%
Return on capital employed 8.4% 5.6% 22.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.1x 1.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.9x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 1.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricETGLNGMPC
Debt / assets 46.2% 50.1% 35.3%
Debt / equity 1.4x 1.4x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.0x 5.3x 1.5x
Debt / FCF 13.1x 4.6x 2.6x
Liabilities / assets 65.9% 63.6% 72.7%
Equity / assets 34.1% 36.4% 27.3%
Interest coverage 2.9x 16.5x 10.4x
Current ratio 1.2x 2.3x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.9x 2.2x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.8x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – – 3.97

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricETGLNGMPC
Dividend yield 6.6% 2.2% 0.9%
Net buyback yield – 0.7% 4.0%
Shareholder yield 6.6% 2.9% 4.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 67.9% – 11.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) 91.6% – 9.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.9% – 2.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.0% – -3.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusETGLNGMPC
Forward P/E 11.4xFY2026 41.1xFY2026 6.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.80FY2026 $1.11FY2026 $68.44FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +48.8%FY2026 -27.5%FY2026 +539.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -9.4% -53.2% -13.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $124.23BFY2026 $409.44MFY2026 $192.95BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +45.2%FY2026 +4.0%FY2026 +42.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.4% -2.6% -9.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersETGLNGMPC
Held by institutions 31.4% 81.4% 75.7%
Institutions holding 1,280 311 1,931
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% -0.4% -0.3%
Institutions buying 628 153 856
Institutions selling 340 105 699
Buyers to sellers 1.85 1.46 1.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ETGLNGMPC
ET 1.00 0.35 0.38
GLNG 0.35 1.00 0.28
MPC 0.38 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ET, GLNG and MPC?

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Energy Transfer (ET) $71.27B, Golar Lng (GLNG) $4.72B, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) $127.52B.

Which stock is cheaper, ET, GLNG and MPC?

Energy Transfer (ET) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Energy Transfer (ET) 14.1x, Golar Lng (GLNG) 28.8x, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) 14.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) is cheapest (Energy Transfer (ET) 11.4x, Golar Lng (GLNG) 41.1x, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) 6.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Golar Lng (GLNG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Energy Transfer (ET) +33.3%, Golar Lng (GLNG) +109.6%, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) +15.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Golar Lng (GLNG) has the highest net margin (Energy Transfer (ET) 4.7%, Golar Lng (GLNG) 31.3%, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) 5.5%). On return on invested capital, Golar Lng (GLNG) leads (Energy Transfer (ET) 8.4%, Golar Lng (GLNG) 22.6%, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) 19.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marathon Petroleum (MPC) returned the most: Energy Transfer (ET) +20.9%, Golar Lng (GLNG) +9.9%, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) +122.1%. Over five years, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) compounded fastest (Energy Transfer (ET) +16.1%/yr, Golar Lng (GLNG) +28.6%/yr, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) +45.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Energy Transfer (ET) has the highest dividend yield: Energy Transfer (ET) 0.07%, Golar Lng (GLNG) 0.00%, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) 0.01%. Golar Lng (GLNG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Energy Transfer (ET) has been the steadiest (Energy Transfer (ET) 17.4%, Golar Lng (GLNG) 27.2%, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) 36.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ET, GLNG and MPC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Marathon Petroleum (MPC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.