ET vs FNV vs OAK-PA Stock Comparison

Energy Transfer, Franco Nevada and Brookfield Oaktree Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ET Energy Transfer LP
$20.90 +5.0% 1M +23.4% 1Y
Market cap
$71.96B
P/E
14.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38B
Div. yield
0.07%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
3 wins
FNV FRANCO NEVADA Corp
$231.54 -6.6% 1M +24.2% 1Y
Market cap
$43.07B
P/E
29.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.32B
Div. yield
0.01%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Franco Nevada leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Franco Nevada 4, Energy Transfer 3, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionETFNVOAK-PALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $71.96B $43.07B $2.33B ET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.3x 29.6x 7.8x OAK-PA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.6x 29.6x — ET
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.3% +73.6% -2.3% FNV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.7% 62.8% 48.6% FNV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.4% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.07% 0.01% 0.07% OAK-PA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +23.4% +24.2% -12.6% FNV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.1%/yr +10.2%/yr -6.2%/yr ET
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 17.5% 39.0% 14.6% OAK-PA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 80/100 42/100 FNV

Percentile Scorecard

ETFNVOAK-PA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisETFNVOAK-PA
Valuation 94 #3 of 35 59 #75 of 181 36 #116 of 181
Growth 55 #16 of 34 91 #11 of 110 60 #45 of 110
Profitability 37 #20 of 31 99 #2 of 127 51 #63 of 127
Financial Health 53 #16 of 33 98 #5 of 162 45 #89 of 162
Shareholder Returns 63 #12 of 31 56 #34 of 76 16 #64 of 76
Overall 60 80 42
  • ET ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • FNV ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • OAK-PA ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodETFNVOAK-PASPY
1 month +5.0%-6.6%-3.8% +0.7%
3 months +3.3%+4.6%-6.9% +3.7%
6 months +3.5%+0.5%-6.4% +7.1%
Year to date +26.7%+11.7%-7.0% +12.8%
1 year +23.4%+24.2%-12.6% +11.9%
3 years +58.9%+83.4%+1.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +16.7%+22.4%+0.6% +22.8%
5 years +119.8%+62.1%-27.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year +17.1%+10.2%-6.2% +10.9%
10 years +38.5%+260.7%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +3.3%+13.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureETFNVOAK-PASPY
Volatility, 1Y 17.5%39.0%14.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 16.7%42.5%16.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.211.270.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.340.62-0.86 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -25.8%-38.2%-28.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.9%-17.5%-12.6% -1.2%
52-week high $21.74$280.82$22.31 $779.14
52-week low $16.21$184.71$19.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleETFNVOAK-PA
P/E now vs peer median 14.3xmedian 19.6x 30.7xmedian 33.5x 7.7xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.8x 19.3xmedian 4.9x 5.1xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.3xmedian 11.1x 20.2xmedian 12.0x —median 12.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.8xmedian 16.9x 25.2xmedian 14.3x -13.4xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.4x 5.4xmedian 1.8x 1.5xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 2.04median 1.68 1.03median 0.97 0.34median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsETFNVOAK-PA
Revenue $107.38B $2.32B $617.93M
Gross profit $25.32B $1.79B –
Operating income $10.78B $1.82B –
Net income $7.04B $1.48B $716.53M
Free cash flow $5.22B $1.77B -$233.55M
EPS (diluted) $1.46 $7.54 $2.53
Cash & equivalents $1.02B $1.01B $255.46M
Total debt $68.41B – $4.99B
Shares (diluted) 3.46B 193.00M 118.83M
Enterprise value $65.14B $40.43B $1.29B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricETFNVOAK-PA
P/E 14.3x 30.7x 7.7x
P/FCF 13.8x 25.2x -13.4x
P/Operating cash flow 5.9x 25.1x -13.4x
P/S 0.7x 19.3x 5.1x
P/B 1.4x 5.4x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 5.4x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 8.3x 20.2x –
EV/EBIT 12.9x 24.0x –
EV/Revenue 1.3x 18.8x 7.1x
EV/FCF 26.7x 24.6x -18.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.5x 24.5x -18.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.04 1.03 0.34

Growth

14 metrics
MetricETFNVOAK-PA
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.3% 73.6% -2.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.0% 23.5% -14.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.9% 88.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 32.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.5% 89.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 34.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 16.1% 88.3% 44.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 30.6% 9.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.6% 87.7% 140.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.0% 29.9% 22.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 8.8% 53.7% -130.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.9% 20.0% 43.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -8.5% 83.9% -130.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.3% 19.8% 43.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricETFNVOAK-PA
Gross margin 23.6% 77.3% –
EBITDA margin 15.7% 93.0% –
Operating margin 10.0% 78.5% –
Pretax margin 7.1% 85.0% –
Net margin 4.7% 62.8% 48.6%
FCF margin 4.9% 76.4% -37.8%
Operating cash flow margin 11.3% 76.7% -37.8%
Return on equity 14.0% 18.1% 32.5%
Return on assets 4.8% 16.7% 10.0%
Return on invested capital 8.4% – –
Return on capital employed 8.4% 20.9% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.3x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.2x -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricETFNVOAK-PA
Debt / assets 46.2% – 21.2%
Debt / equity 1.4x – 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.0x – –
Debt / FCF 13.1x – -6.4x
Liabilities / assets 65.9% 7.6% 70.9%
Equity / assets 34.1% 92.4% 29.1%
Interest coverage 2.9x 1,070x –
Current ratio 1.2x 9.4x –
Quick ratio 0.9x 8.5x –
Cash ratio 0.1x 6.9x –
Altman Z-score – 40.72 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricETFNVOAK-PA
Dividend yield 6.4% 0.7% 0.0%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 6.4% 0.7% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 67.9% 18.0% 22.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) 91.6% 15.1% -68.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.9% 12.4% -68.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 11.0% 3.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusETFNVOAK-PA
Forward P/E 11.6xFY2026 29.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.80FY2026 $7.83FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +48.8%FY2026 +40.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -9.4% +8.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $124.23BFY2026 $2.66BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +45.2%FY2026 +46.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +1.4% +1.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersETFNVOAK-PA
Held by institutions 31.4% 71.6% –
Institutions holding 1,281 662 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% +0.4% –
Institutions buying 628 336 –
Institutions selling 341 207 –
Buyers to sellers 1.84 1.62 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ETFNVOAK-PA
ET 1.00 0.00 0.01
FNV 0.00 1.00 0.06
OAK-PA 0.01 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ET, FNV and OAK-PA?

Energy Transfer (ET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Energy Transfer (ET) $71.96B, Franco Nevada (FNV) $43.07B, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) $2.33B.

Which stock is cheaper, ET, FNV and OAK-PA?

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Energy Transfer (ET) 14.3x, Franco Nevada (FNV) 29.6x, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 7.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Energy Transfer (ET) is cheapest (Energy Transfer (ET) 11.6x, Franco Nevada (FNV) 29.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Franco Nevada (FNV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Energy Transfer (ET) +33.3%, Franco Nevada (FNV) +73.6%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -2.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Franco Nevada (FNV) has the highest net margin (Energy Transfer (ET) 4.7%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 62.8%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 48.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Franco Nevada (FNV) returned the most: Energy Transfer (ET) +23.4%, Franco Nevada (FNV) +24.2%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -12.6%. Over five years, Energy Transfer (ET) compounded fastest (Energy Transfer (ET) +17.1%/yr, Franco Nevada (FNV) +10.2%/yr, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -6.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) has the highest dividend yield: Energy Transfer (ET) 0.07%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 0.01%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 0.07%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) has been the steadiest (Energy Transfer (ET) 17.5%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 39.0%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 14.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ET, FNV and OAK-PA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Franco Nevada (FNV) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.