ET vs FGPR vs TMDE Stock Comparison

Energy Transfer, Ferrellgas Partners L P and TMD Energy Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ET Energy Transfer LP
$20.61 +2.0% 1M +23.2% 1Y
Market cap
$70.74B
P/E
14.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38B
Div. yield
0.07%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
8 wins
TMDE TMD Energy Ltd
$0.58 -13.4% 1M -27.5% 1Y
Market cap
$12.82M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Fuel Distribution Energy

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Energy Transfer leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Energy Transfer 8, Ferrellgas Partners L P 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionETFGPRTMDELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $70.74B $120.75M $12.82M ET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.0x 1.6x -1.5x FGPR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.5x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.3% -3.6% — ET
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.7% 4.1% — ET
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.4% 38.5% — FGPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.0x 4.9x — ET
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.07% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +23.2% +6.6% -27.5% ET
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.2%/yr -3.2%/yr — ET
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 17.5% 37.0% 219.0% ET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 49/100 — ET

Percentile Scorecard

ETFGPRTMDE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisETFGPRTMDE
Valuation 94 #3 of 35 77 #6 of 23 73 #7 of 23
Growth 61 #14 of 34 33 #13 of 19 –
Profitability 30 #24 of 34 77 #5 of 18 –
Financial Health 59 #15 of 35 9 #22 of 24 13 #21 of 24
Shareholder Returns 70 #10 of 31 – –
Overall 63 49 –
  • ET ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • FGPR ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • TMDE ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodETFGPRTMDESPY
1 month +2.0%-7.6%-13.4% -0.8%
3 months +3.5%-11.4%-28.4% +3.5%
6 months +8.2%-21.6%-50.8% +7.0%
Year to date +25.0%+9.8%+36.5% +12.2%
1 year +23.2%+6.6%-27.5% +13.0%
3 years +57.2%+160.6%— +86.3%
3 years, per year +16.3%+37.7%— +23.1%
5 years +111.8%-14.9%— +68.6%
5 years, per year +16.2%-3.2%— +11.0%
10 years +30.9%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +2.7%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureETFGPRTMDESPY
Volatility, 1Y 17.5%37.0%219.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 16.6%33.8%161.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.21-0.07-2.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.330.18-0.13 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -25.8%-73.4%-92.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.2%-25.7%-85.6% -1.8%
52-week high $21.74$27.20$4.04 $779.14
52-week low $16.21$17.07$0.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleETFGPRTMDE
P/E now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 21.0x 1.6xmedian 9.5x -1.5xmedian 9.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.7x 0.1xmedian 0.3x 0.1xmedian 0.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 11.0x 5.3xmedian 7.3x —median 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.6xmedian 16.6x 1.4xmedian 9.5x —median 9.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.6x -0.1xmedian 1.9x 1.0xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median 2.01median 1.92 -0.05median 0.35 —median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsETFGPRTMDE
Revenue $107.38B $1.86B –
Gross profit $25.32B $1.03B –
Operating income $10.78B $196.22M –
Net income $7.04B $76.61M –
Free cash flow $5.22B $86.92M –
EPS (diluted) $1.46 $9.30 –
Cash & equivalents $1.02B $73.41M $8.41M
Total debt $68.41B $5.98B $293.09M
Shares (diluted) 3.46B 8.22M 21.36M
Enterprise value $63.92B -$197.77M -$23.56M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricETFGPRTMDE
P/E 14.1x 1.6x -1.5x
P/FCF 13.6x 1.4x –
P/Operating cash flow 5.9x 0.7x –
P/S 0.7x 0.1x 0.1x
P/B 1.4x -0.1x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 1.6x -0.1x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA 8.2x 5.3x –
EV/EBIT 12.8x 8.1x –
EV/Revenue 1.3x 0.9x –
EV/FCF 26.5x 18.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 11.4x 9.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.01 -0.05 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricETFGPRTMDE
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.3% -3.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.0% -3.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.9% 0.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 1.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.5% 106.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.0% -7.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 16.1% 847.0% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.0% -19.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 12.6% 575.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.0% -32.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 8.8% -8.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.9% -1.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -8.5% -25.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.3% 3.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricETFGPRTMDE
Gross margin 23.6% 55.1% –
EBITDA margin 15.7% 16.1% –
Operating margin 10.0% 10.5% –
Pretax margin 7.1% 4.2% –
Net margin 4.7% 4.1% –
FCF margin 4.9% 4.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 11.3% 9.1% –
Return on equity 14.0% – –
Return on assets 4.8% 5.1% –
Return on invested capital 8.4% 38.5% –
Return on capital employed 8.4% 17.0% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 2.2x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricETFGPRTMDE
Debt / assets 46.2% 105.2% 73.7%
Debt / equity 1.4x -1.4x 6.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.0x 4.9x –
Debt / FCF 13.1x 17.8x –
Liabilities / assets 65.9% 172.8% 89.2%
Equity / assets 34.1% -72.8% 10.8%
Interest coverage 2.9x 1.7x –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.1x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.7x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 1.76 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricETFGPRTMDE
Dividend yield 6.5% – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 6.5% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) 67.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 91.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.0% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusETFGPRTMDE
Forward P/E 11.5xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.80FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +48.8%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -9.4% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $124.23BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +45.2%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +1.4% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersETFGPRTMDE
Held by institutions 31.4% 0.0% –
Institutions holding 1,279 1 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% – –
Institutions buying 628 0 –
Institutions selling 340 0 –
Buyers to sellers 1.85 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ETFGPRTMDE
ET 1.00 -0.05 0.10
FGPR -0.05 1.00 0.11
TMDE 0.10 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ET, FGPR and TMDE?

Energy Transfer (ET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Energy Transfer (ET) $70.74B, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) $120.75M, TMD Energy (TMDE) $12.82M.

Which stock is cheaper, ET, FGPR and TMDE?

Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Energy Transfer (ET) 14.0x, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 1.6x, TMD Energy (TMDE) -1.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Energy Transfer (ET) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Energy Transfer (ET) +33.3%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Energy Transfer (ET) has the highest net margin (Energy Transfer (ET) 4.7%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 4.1%). On return on invested capital, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) leads (Energy Transfer (ET) 8.4%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 38.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Energy Transfer (ET) returned the most: Energy Transfer (ET) +23.2%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) +6.6%, TMD Energy (TMDE) -27.5%. Over five years, Energy Transfer (ET) compounded fastest (Energy Transfer (ET) +16.2%/yr, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Energy Transfer (ET) 0.07%, TMD Energy (TMDE) 0.00%. Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) and TMD Energy (TMDE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Energy Transfer (ET) has been the steadiest (Energy Transfer (ET) 17.5%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 37.0%, TMD Energy (TMDE) 219.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ET, FGPR and TMDE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Energy Transfer (ET) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.