ESGH vs MWYN vs SMG Stock Comparison

Esg, Marwynn Holdings and Scotts Miracle-Gro Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ESGH ESG Inc.
$2.78 +39.0% 1M -47.2% 1Y
Market cap
$60.66M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.80M
Div. yield
–
Agricultural Products Consumer Staples
MWYN Marwynn Holdings, Inc.
$1.76 +77.8% 1M +83.3% 1Y
Market cap
$37.97M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.29M
Div. yield
–
Food Distribution Consumer Staples
3 wins
SMG Scotts Miracle-Gro Co
$61.86 +25.2% 1M +14.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.61B
P/E
48.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.48B
Div. yield
0.04%
Agricultural Products Consumer Staples
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Scotts Miracle-Gro leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Scotts Miracle-Gro 4, Marwynn Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionESGHMWYNSMGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $60.66M $37.97M $3.61B SMG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -16.4x -29.0x 48.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 13.5x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -84.8% +603.3% +4.6% MWYN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -205.3% -24.7% 2.1% SMG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 12.0% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x -0.4x 4.6x MWYN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.04% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -47.2% +83.3% +14.5% MWYN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -16.1%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 158.7% 124.9% 38.4% SMG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 18/100 47/100 57/100 SMG

Percentile Scorecard

ESGHMWYNSMG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisESGHMWYNSMG
Valuation 21 #27 of 34 0 #40 of 40 49 #18 of 34
Growth 14 #26 of 30 100 #1 of 38 90 #4 of 30
Profitability 22 #22 of 28 0 #36 of 36 93 #3 of 28
Financial Health 14 #31 of 36 87 #6 of 40 17 #30 of 36
Shareholder Returns – – 35 #16 of 24
Overall 18 47 57
  • ESGH ranked among 38 companies in Agribusiness
  • MWYN ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail
  • SMG ranked among 38 companies in Agribusiness

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodESGHMWYNSMGSPY
1 month +39.0%+77.8%+25.2% +0.7%
3 months +73.7%+141.1%-9.4% +3.7%
6 months +11.2%+203.4%-1.3% +7.1%
Year to date -46.5%+109.5%+6.0% +12.8%
1 year -47.2%+83.3%+14.5% +11.9%
3 years +178.0%—+37.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year +40.6%—+11.1% +22.8%
5 years ——-58.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year ——-16.1% +10.9%
10 years ——-29.9% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——-3.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureESGHMWYNSMGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 158.7%124.9%38.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 239.8%134.3%37.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.16-0.570.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.300.670.38 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.2%-95.2%-77.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.7%-34.8%-15.8% -1.2%
52-week high $5.53$2.70$73.48 $779.14
52-week low $0.85$0.49$48.44 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleESGHMWYNSMG
P/E now vs peer median -16.4xmedian 15.9x -27.2xmedian 22.1x 48.7xmedian 15.9x
P/S now vs peer median 33.7xmedian 0.4x 6.7xmedian 0.5x 1.0xmedian 0.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -35.2xmedian 8.8x -53.5xmedian 9.5x 12.6xmedian 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 38.4xmedian 15.9x -18.0xmedian 16.0x 13.7xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median -162.1xmedian 1.0x 14.2xmedian 2.8x -17.3xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.34 —median 1.07 1.34median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsESGHMWYNSMG
Revenue $1.80M $5.29M $3.48B
Gross profit $436.95K $844.44K $1.11B
Operating income -$3.57M -$730.77K $382.50M
Net income -$3.14M -$1.31M $73.90M
Free cash flow $1.58M -$1.98M $263.30M
EPS (diluted) $-0.17 $-0.06 $1.25
Cash & equivalents $161.10K $3.54K $27.70M
Total debt $13.03M $736.48K $2.11B
Shares (diluted) 21.82M 20.19M 59.20M
Enterprise value $60.10M $36.15M $3.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricESGHMWYNSMG
P/E -16.4x -27.2x 48.7x
P/FCF 38.4x -18.0x 13.7x
P/Operating cash flow 39.2x -18.0x 9.7x
P/S 33.7x 6.7x 1.0x
P/B -162.1x 14.2x -17.3x
P/Tangible book -162.1x 14.9x -6.4x
EV/EBITDA -35.2x -53.5x 12.6x
EV/EBIT -17.1x -49.0x 14.9x
EV/Revenue 33.9x 6.8x 1.6x
EV/FCF 38.6x -18.1x 21.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 39.4x -18.1x 15.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 1.34

Growth

14 metrics
MetricESGHMWYNSMG
Revenue growth (1Y) -84.8% 603.3% 4.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -1.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -90.0% 126.3% 13.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 19.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -309.8% 88.7% 23.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 178.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -302.0% 80.7% 39.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 36.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -363.7% 83.7% 37.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 36.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 99,243% 64.4% 17.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -12.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 350.2% 64.1% 7.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -16.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricESGHMWYNSMG
Gross margin 24.3% 16.0% 31.8%
EBITDA margin -96.2% -12.7% 13.0%
Operating margin -198.3% -13.8% 11.0%
Pretax margin -213.0% -12.4% 7.2%
Net margin -205.3% -24.7% 2.1%
FCF margin 87.6% -37.4% 7.6%
Operating cash flow margin 86.0% -37.4% 10.6%
Return on equity -73.8% -51.5% –
Return on assets -29.5% -42.8% 1.9%
Return on invested capital – – 12.0%
Return on capital employed -27.6% -29.8% 17.6%
Asset turnover 0.1x 1.7x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.5x 1.5x 5.0x
Stock comp / revenue 34.1% 2.2% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricESGHMWYNSMG
Debt / assets 252.2% 9.7% 66.7%
Debt / equity -1.3x 0.1x -10.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x -0.4x 4.6x
Debt / FCF 0.3x -0.2x 8.0x
Liabilities / assets 296.1% 19.5% 106.6%
Equity / assets -196.1% 80.5% -6.6%
Interest coverage – – 3.4x
Current ratio 0.3x 4.9x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.3x 2.2x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 1.86 33.49 2.41

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricESGHMWYNSMG
Dividend yield – – 4.3%
Net buyback yield – – 0.2%
Shareholder yield – – 4.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 208.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 58.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 1.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusESGHMWYNSMG
Forward P/E – – 13.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $4.59FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +22.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +7.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $3.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – -7.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +9.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersESGHMWYNSMG
Held by institutions – – 86.5%
Institutions holding – – 466
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +9.2%
Institutions buying – – 244
Institutions selling – – 138
Buyers to sellers – – 1.77

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ESGHMWYNSMG
ESGH 1.00 0.02 0.10
MWYN 0.02 1.00 -0.08
SMG 0.10 -0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ESGH, MWYN and SMG?

Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Esg (ESGH) $60.66M, Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) $37.97M, Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) $3.61B.

Which company is growing faster?

Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Esg (ESGH) -84.8%, Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) +603.3%, Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) +4.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) has the highest net margin (Esg (ESGH) -205.3%, Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) -24.7%, Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) 2.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) returned the most: Esg (ESGH) -47.2%, Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) +83.3%, Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) +14.5%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) 0.00%, Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) 0.04%. Esg (ESGH) and Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) has been the steadiest (Esg (ESGH) 158.7%, Marwynn Holdings (MWYN) 124.9%, Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) 38.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ESGH, MWYN and SMG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.