ERO vs TECK vs TGB Stock Comparison

Ero Copper, Teck Resources and Trekor Metals Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TMC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ERO Ero Copper Corp.
$30.46 -19.7% 1M +47.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.18B
P/E
8.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.22B
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
5 wins
TECK Teck Resources Ltd
$61.77 -9.9% 1M +44.7% 1Y
Market cap
$31.68B
P/E
11.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.90B
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
4 wins
TGB Trekor Metals Ltd
$7.42 -17.1% 1M +65.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.44B
P/E
169.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$916.35M
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ero Copper leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ero Copper 5, Teck Resources 4, Trekor Metals 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEROTECKTGBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.18B $31.68B $2.44B TECK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.1x 11.5x 169.5x ERO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.3x 13.3x 19.0x ERO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +106.7% +45.2% +72.6% ERO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.4% 25.2% 1.6% ERO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 27.3% 25.6% 23.0% ERO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.5x -0.4x 1.3x TECK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +47.8% +44.7% +65.6% TGB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.8%/yr +17.5%/yr +27.4%/yr TGB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 63.4% 46.8% 71.6% TECK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 78/100 65/100 TECK

Percentile Scorecard

EROTECKTGB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEROTECKTGB
Valuation 66 #58 of 168 82 #31 of 168 69 #53 of 168
Growth 89 #17 of 152 82 #29 of 152 93 #12 of 152
Profitability 81 #25 of 124 87 #17 of 124 76 #30 of 124
Financial Health 35 #108 of 166 55 #76 of 166 19 #134 of 166
Shareholder Returns 69 #36 of 115 83 #21 of 115 66 #40 of 115
Overall 68 78 65
  • ERO ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • TECK ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • TGB ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEROTECKTGBSPY
1 month -19.7%-9.9%-17.1% -2.0%
3 months +5.0%-4.6%-5.4% -2.2%
6 months +18.0%+6.9%+8.5% +4.2%
Year to date +7.7%+29.0%+31.1% +10.6%
1 year +47.8%+44.7%+65.6% +10.4%
3 years +125.3%+65.9%+470.8% +73.6%
3 years, per year +31.1%+18.4%+78.8% +20.2%
5 years +66.9%+124.1%+235.7% +61.6%
5 years, per year +10.8%+17.5%+27.4% +10.1%
10 years —+192.6%+1,496.7% +261.3%
10 years, per year —+11.3%+31.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEROTECKTGBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 63.4%46.8%71.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.8%45.8%71.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.492.223.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.750.960.92 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.8%-47.0%-61.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.6%-14.2%-23.3% -3.2%
52-week high $40.40$71.97$9.68 $779.14
52-week low $19.89$38.23$4.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEROTECKTGB
P/E now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 12.4x 11.1xmedian 12.4x 166.5xmedian 12.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.9x 2.8xmedian 2.9x 2.9xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 7.2x 3.8xmedian 7.2x 6.7xmedian 7.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -11.7xmedian 14.8x 10.9xmedian 14.8x 5.3xmedian 14.8x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 2.1x 1.5xmedian 2.1x 3.1xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.13median 0.26 0.52median 0.26 3.45median 0.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEROTECKTGB
Revenue $1.22B $10.90B $916.35M
Gross profit $561.32M $4.37B $387.04M
Operating income $486.90M $5.77B $372.24M
Net income $396.75M $2.73B $15.68M
Free cash flow -$271.76M $2.78B $502.57M
R&D – $61.23M –
EPS (diluted) $3.78 $5.55 $0.04
Cash & equivalents $114.05M $4.71B $185.76M
Total debt $467.51M $2.59B $809.11M
Shares (diluted) 104.13M 495.40M 323.50M
Enterprise value $2.77B $11.99B $1.86B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEROTECKTGB
P/E 8.0x 11.1x 166.5x
P/FCF -11.7x 10.9x 5.3x
P/Operating cash flow – – 6.5x
P/S 2.6x 2.8x 2.9x
P/B 2.4x 1.5x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 1.5x 3.1x
EV/EBITDA 5.4x 3.8x 6.7x
EV/EBIT 7.2x 4.7x 8.9x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 2.5x 3.6x
EV/FCF -13.0x 9.8x 6.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 8.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.13 0.52 3.45

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEROTECKTGB
Revenue growth (1Y) 106.7% 45.2% 72.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 41.6% 5.8% 32.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 141.3% 176.6% 154.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 49.6% 9.5% 49.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 179.2% 149.5% 167.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 62.5% 30.7% 53.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 184.9% 590.2% 155.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 70.7% 245.1% -5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 185.1% 336.9% 159.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 64.1% 21.5% 48.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 88.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 78.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 32.3% 530.3% 73.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -17.2% -9.2% 63.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEROTECKTGB
Gross margin 46.2% 40.1% 42.2%
EBITDA margin 53.3% 65.8% 54.2%
Operating margin 40.1% 53.0% 40.6%
Pretax margin 39.7% 43.5% 43.3%
Net margin 32.4% 25.2% 1.6%
FCF margin -22.4% 25.5% 54.8%
Operating cash flow margin – – 45.3%
Return on equity 37.9% 13.7% 5.6%
Return on assets 22.2% 7.9% 1.8%
Return on invested capital 27.3% 25.6% 23.0%
Return on capital employed – 18.5% 15.8%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.3x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 26.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.7% 0.4% 3.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEROTECKTGB
Debt / assets 21.2% 7.3% 30.3%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.1x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.5x -0.4x 1.3x
Debt / FCF -1.7x 0.9x 1.6x
Liabilities / assets 39.5% 42.0% 68.0%
Equity / assets 60.5% 58.0% 32.0%
Interest coverage 10.8x 9.2x 8.3x
Current ratio – 2.8x –
Quick ratio – 2.3x 0.8x
Cash ratio – 1.6x 0.7x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEROTECKTGB
Dividend yield – 0.8% –
Net buyback yield -0.2% 2.7% -0.4%
Shareholder yield -0.2% 3.6% -0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEROTECKTGB
Forward P/E 7.3xFY2026 13.3xFY2026 19.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.16FY2026 $4.66FY2026 $0.39FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +96.2%FY2026 +107.1%FY2026 +680.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +20.4% -14.2% +112.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.24BFY2026 $10.56BFY2026 $936.91MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +57.4%FY2026 +34.9%FY2026 +91.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.5% +11.0% +27.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEROTECKTGB
Held by institutions 67.3% 69.3% 0.2%
Institutions holding 209 524 4
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.2% +3.2% -99.7%
Institutions buying 125 258 2
Institutions selling 60 169 2
Buyers to sellers 2.08 1.53 1.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EROTECKTGB
ERO 1.00 0.73 0.78
TECK 0.73 1.00 0.76
TGB 0.78 0.76 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ERO, TECK and TGB?

Teck Resources (TECK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ero Copper (ERO) $3.18B, Teck Resources (TECK) $31.68B, Trekor Metals (TGB) $2.44B.

Which stock is cheaper, ERO, TECK and TGB?

Ero Copper (ERO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ero Copper (ERO) 8.1x, Teck Resources (TECK) 11.5x, Trekor Metals (TGB) 169.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ero Copper (ERO) is cheapest (Ero Copper (ERO) 7.3x, Teck Resources (TECK) 13.3x, Trekor Metals (TGB) 19.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ero Copper (ERO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ero Copper (ERO) +106.7%, Teck Resources (TECK) +45.2%, Trekor Metals (TGB) +72.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ero Copper (ERO) has the highest net margin (Ero Copper (ERO) 32.4%, Teck Resources (TECK) 25.2%, Trekor Metals (TGB) 1.6%). On return on invested capital, Ero Copper (ERO) leads (Ero Copper (ERO) 27.3%, Teck Resources (TECK) 25.6%, Trekor Metals (TGB) 23.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Trekor Metals (TGB) returned the most: Ero Copper (ERO) +47.8%, Teck Resources (TECK) +44.7%, Trekor Metals (TGB) +65.6%. Over five years, Trekor Metals (TGB) compounded fastest (Ero Copper (ERO) +10.8%/yr, Teck Resources (TECK) +17.5%/yr, Trekor Metals (TGB) +27.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Teck Resources (TECK) has been the steadiest (Ero Copper (ERO) 63.4%, Teck Resources (TECK) 46.8%, Trekor Metals (TGB) 71.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ERO, TECK and TGB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ero Copper (ERO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.