ERIC vs SILC vs AAOI Stock Comparison

Ericsson Lm Telephone, Silicom and Applied Optoelectronics Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ERIC Ericsson Lm Telephone Co
$11.08 +16.3% 1M +17.5% 1Y
Market cap
$37.35B
P/E
18.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$24.56B
Div. yield
2.80%
Networking Equipment Technology
7 wins
SILC Silicom Ltd.
$42.00 -20.4% 1M +141.4% 1Y
Market cap
$239.66M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$75.43M
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Ericsson Lm Telephone leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Ericsson Lm Telephone 7, Applied Optoelectronics 2, Silicom 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionERICSILCAAOILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $37.35B $239.66M $6.49B ERIC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.1x -24.5x -110.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.0x — 108.4x ERIC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -38.5% +28.6% +61.8% AAOI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.3% -13.0% -9.6% ERIC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 20.0% — -4.2% ERIC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.6x — 13.8x ERIC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.80% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.5% +141.4% +106.7% SILC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.1%/yr 0.0%/yr +58.7%/yr AAOI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.5% 90.3% 138.8% ERIC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 36/100 33/100 ERIC

Percentile Scorecard

ERICSILCAAOI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisERICSILCAAOI
Valuation 87 #15 of 112 41 #67 of 112 13 #98 of 112
Growth 47 #58 of 109 21 #86 of 109 56 #49 of 109
Profitability 86 #15 of 104 18 #85 of 104 17 #87 of 104
Financial Health 38 #72 of 116 65 #41 of 116 72 #33 of 116
Shareholder Returns 48 #43 of 81 – 9 #74 of 81
Overall 61 36 33
  • ERIC ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SILC ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • AAOI ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodERICSILCAAOISPY
1 month +16.3%-20.4%-24.1% -0.2%
3 months +11.1%+10.5%-12.7% +3.9%
6 months -1.9%+52.5%-43.9% +8.2%
Year to date +14.8%+185.7%+120.7% +12.9%
1 year +17.5%+141.4%+106.7% +12.3%
3 years +154.1%+180.0%+993.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +36.5%+41.0%+122.0% +23.3%
5 years +0.4%0.0%+904.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year +0.1%0.0%+58.7% +10.9%
10 years +124.3%+15.1%+284.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +8.4%+1.4%+14.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureERICSILCAAOISPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.5%90.3%138.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.7%79.5%126.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.033.014.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.481.570.77 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.8%-77.3%-82.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.4%-31.9%-65.5% -1.2%
52-week high $13.74$61.65$223.10 $779.14
52-week low $9.15$13.50$19.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleERICSILCAAOI
P/E now vs peer median 18.1xmedian 33.2x -24.5xmedian 33.2x -110.1xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.8x 3.2xmedian 2.8x 10.9xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.3xmedian 20.0x —median 20.0x -188.5xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.9xmedian 29.8x —median 29.8x -10.8xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 3.0x 2.1xmedian 3.0x 3.9xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.42median 1.17 0.65median 1.17 -3.32median 1.17

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsERICSILCAAOI
Revenue $24.56B $75.43M $595.97M
Gross profit $11.51B $22.75M $172.33M
Operating income $2.90B -$10.69M -$67.41M
Net income $2.04B -$9.79M -$57.02M
Free cash flow $3.76B – -$600.81M
R&D $5.22B $21.03M $107.61M
EPS (diluted) $0.61 $-1.72 $-0.70
Cash & equivalents $5.11B $25.15M $499.74M
Total debt $3.73B – $57.26M
Shares (diluted) 3.34B 5.71M 81.57M
Enterprise value $14.97B $100.35M $5.21B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricERICSILCAAOI
P/E 18.1x -24.5x -110.1x
P/FCF 9.9x – -10.8x
P/Operating cash flow 10.8x – -49.3x
P/S 1.5x 3.2x 10.9x
P/B 3.4x 2.1x 3.9x
P/Tangible book 3.4x 2.2x 3.9x
EV/EBITDA 9.3x – -188.5x
EV/EBIT 12.2x -19.5x -89.8x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 2.8x 10.2x
EV/FCF 9.4x – -10.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.2x – -45.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.42 0.65 -3.32

Growth

14 metrics
MetricERICSILCAAOI
Revenue growth (1Y) -38.5% 28.6% 61.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.0% -22.1% 40.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.7% 31.6% 62.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.0% -24.5% 73.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -18.4% 18.2% -40.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 55.0% -35.7% -2.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -18.7% 34.3% 63.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 43.4% -36.0% 6.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -17.7% 30.7% 74.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 43.1% -37.8% 33.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.3% – 15.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 44.0% – -168.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.1% – -146.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.7% – -294.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricERICSILCAAOI
Gross margin 46.8% 30.2% 28.9%
EBITDA margin 15.4% – -5.4%
Operating margin 11.8% -14.2% -11.3%
Pretax margin 11.2% -12.3% -10.6%
Net margin 8.3% -13.0% -9.6%
FCF margin 15.3% – -100.8%
Operating cash flow margin 14.0% – -22.1%
Return on equity 18.7% -8.5% -4.1%
Return on assets 6.8% -6.1% -2.9%
Return on invested capital 20.0% – -4.2%
Return on capital employed 17.8% -8.9% -4.5%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x – 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 2.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricERICSILCAAOI
Debt / assets 12.4% – 2.5%
Debt / equity 0.3x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.6x – 13.8x
Debt / FCF 1.0x – -0.1x
Liabilities / assets 63.1% 29.5% 27.5%
Equity / assets 36.9% 70.5% 72.5%
Interest coverage – – -19.1x
Current ratio 1.2x 3.1x 2.8x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.3x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.8x 1.2x
Altman Z-score – 4.64 6.39

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricERICSILCAAOI
Dividend yield 2.8% – –
Net buyback yield -2.2% – -20.8%
Shareholder yield 0.6% 0.0% -20.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) 50.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 27.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -13.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -7.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusERICSILCAAOI
Forward P/E 17.0xFY2026 – 108.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.65FY2026 $-0.43FY2026 $0.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -30.9%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -3.1% – +646.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $24.16BFY2026 $91.18MFY2026 $994.70MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -8.1%FY2026 +47.2%FY2026 +118.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.0% +29.1% +185.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersERICSILCAAOI
Held by institutions 9.5% 43.1% 60.5%
Institutions holding 388 51 481
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.4% +42.4% -3.5%
Institutions buying 219 32 313
Institutions selling 110 12 143
Buyers to sellers 1.99 2.67 2.19

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ERICSILCAAOI
ERIC 1.00 0.20 0.23
SILC 0.20 1.00 0.36
AAOI 0.23 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ERIC, SILC and AAOI?

Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) $37.35B, Silicom (SILC) $239.66M, Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) $6.49B.

Which company is growing faster?

Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) -38.5%, Silicom (SILC) +28.6%, Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) +61.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) has the highest net margin (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 8.3%, Silicom (SILC) -13.0%, Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) -9.6%). On return on invested capital, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) leads (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 20.0%, Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) -4.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Silicom (SILC) returned the most: Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) +17.5%, Silicom (SILC) +141.4%, Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) +106.7%. Over five years, Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) compounded fastest (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) +0.1%/yr, Silicom (SILC) 0.0%/yr, Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) +58.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 2.80%, Silicom (SILC) 0.00%. Silicom (SILC) and Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) has been the steadiest (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 36.5%, Silicom (SILC) 90.3%, Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) 138.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ERIC, SILC and AAOI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.