EQPT vs TT vs HRI Stock Comparison

EquipmentShare.com, Trane Technologies and Herc Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TT Trane Technologies plc
$461.22 +1.4% 1M +7.7% 1Y
Market cap
$101.48B
P/E
34.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$22.21B
Div. yield
0.89%
HVAC Industrials
5 wins
HRI Herc Holdings Inc
$156.00 +15.2% 1M +17.0% 1Y
Market cap
$5.21B
P/E
86.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.92B
Div. yield
1.79%
Equipment Rental Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Trane Technologies leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Trane Technologies 5, Herc Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEQPTTTHRILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.81B $101.48B $5.21B TT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 280.0x 34.6x 86.7x TT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.6x 29.5x 22.5x HRI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +7.0% +19.4% HRI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 13.3% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 24.4% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.89% 1.79% HRI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — +7.7% +17.0% HRI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +20.5%/yr -2.8%/yr TT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 83.5% 29.2% 60.6% TT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 51/100 51/100 TT

Percentile Scorecard

EQPTTTHRI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEQPTTTHRI
Valuation 11 #41 of 46 9 #51 of 56 58 #20 of 46
Growth – 65 #19 of 52 84 #7 of 39
Profitability – 90 #6 of 49 53 #19 of 39
Financial Health 28 #34 of 47 56 #25 of 56 7 #44 of 47
Shareholder Returns – 38 #26 of 41 55 #15 of 32
Overall – 51 51
  • EQPT ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • TT ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products
  • HRI ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEQPTTTHRISPY
1 month +2.1%+1.4%+15.2% -0.2%
3 months -8.4%-1.9%+5.0% +3.9%
6 months -23.0%-4.1%+16.5% +8.2%
Year to date —+18.5%+5.1% +12.9%
1 year —+7.7%+17.0% +12.3%
3 years —+149.7%+47.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+35.7%+13.9% +23.3%
5 years —+153.8%-13.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+20.5%-2.8% +10.9%
10 years —+786.8%+426.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+24.4%+18.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEQPTTTHRISPY
Volatility, 1Y 83.5%29.2%60.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 84.6%30.2%53.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.071.151.94 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —0.260.28 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -60.8%-40.3%-62.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -48.9%-8.4%-13.9% -1.2%
52-week high $34.63$503.46$181.12 $779.14
52-week low $13.59$376.43$91.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEQPTTTHRI
P/E now vs peer median 280.0xmedian 25.3x 34.6xmedian 20.1x 86.7xmedian 25.3x
P/S now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 1.0x 4.6xmedian 1.5x 1.1xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.4x 23.9xmedian 11.8x —median 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 21.9x 28.3xmedian 16.2x -33.2xmedian 21.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 2.6x 11.7xmedian 2.9x 2.6xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 2.38 1.97median 0.99 —median 2.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEQPTTTHRI
Revenue – $22.21B $4.92B
Gross profit – $7.86B –
Operating income – $3.98B –
Net income – $2.97B $123.00M
Free cash flow – $3.58B –
EPS (diluted) – $13.25 –
Cash & equivalents $443.00M $1.32B $66.00M
Total debt $3.64B $4.62B –
Shares (diluted) 260.00M 222.50M 33.50M
Enterprise value $3.36B $96.22B $5.21B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEQPTTTHRI
P/E 280.0x 34.6x 86.7x
P/FCF – 28.3x -33.2x
P/Operating cash flow – 25.9x 4.1x
P/S 2.6x 4.6x 1.1x
P/B 3.1x 11.7x 2.6x
P/Tangible book 3.6x 19.8x 12.3x
EV/EBITDA – 23.9x –
EV/EBIT – 26.3x –
EV/Revenue – 4.7x 1.1x
EV/FCF – 29.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 26.8x 4.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.97 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEQPTTTHRI
Revenue growth (1Y) – 7.0% 19.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 9.7% 14.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 4.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 0.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 4.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 14.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 3.3% 278.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 16.1% -29.7%
EPS growth (1Y) – 4.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 17.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 19.9% 15.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.8% 5.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 26.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 32.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEQPTTTHRI
Gross margin – 35.4% –
EBITDA margin – 19.7% –
Operating margin – 17.9% –
Pretax margin – 16.8% –
Net margin – 13.3% –
FCF margin – 16.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 17.6% 25.8%
Return on equity – 34.4% 6.4%
Return on assets – 12.7% 0.9%
Return on invested capital – 24.4% –
Return on capital employed – 26.7% –
Asset turnover – 1.0x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.3x 10.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.4% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEQPTTTHRI
Debt / assets 51.1% 19.3% –
Debt / equity 3.0x 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.8x –
Debt / FCF – 1.3x –
Liabilities / assets 83.0% 63.9% 85.9%
Equity / assets 17.0% 36.1% 14.1%
Interest coverage – 18.1x –
Current ratio 2.4x 1.1x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.5x 0.7x –
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.2x –
Altman Z-score – 6.11 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEQPTTTHRI
Dividend yield – 0.9% 1.8%
Net buyback yield – 1.3% –
Shareholder yield – 2.2% 1.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 29.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 24.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 10.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEQPTTTHRI
Forward P/E 31.6xFY2026 29.5xFY2026 22.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.56FY2026 $15.64FY2026 $6.93FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5,500.0%FY2026 +19.8%FY2026 -8.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.4% +10.2% +61.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.53BFY2026 $25.40BFY2026 $4.76BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +26.3%FY2026 +19.1%FY2026 +8.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +26.0% +7.8% +15.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEQPTTTHRI
Held by institutions 42.5% 87.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 144 1,810 334
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.3% +0.3% +7.0%
Institutions buying 102 894 205
Institutions selling 23 579 86
Buyers to sellers 4.43 1.54 2.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EQPTTTHRI
EQPT 1.00 0.20 0.43
TT 0.20 1.00 0.33
HRI 0.43 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EQPT, TT and HRI?

Trane Technologies (TT) is the largest by market capitalisation: EquipmentShare.com (EQPT) $3.81B, Trane Technologies (TT) $101.48B, Herc Holdings (HRI) $5.21B.

Which stock is cheaper, EQPT, TT and HRI?

Trane Technologies (TT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (EquipmentShare.com (EQPT) 280.0x, Trane Technologies (TT) 34.6x, Herc Holdings (HRI) 86.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Herc Holdings (HRI) is cheapest (EquipmentShare.com (EQPT) 31.6x, Trane Technologies (TT) 29.5x, Herc Holdings (HRI) 22.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Herc Holdings (HRI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Trane Technologies (TT) +7.0%, Herc Holdings (HRI) +19.4%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Herc Holdings (HRI) returned the most: Trane Technologies (TT) +7.7%, Herc Holdings (HRI) +17.0%. Over five years, Trane Technologies (TT) compounded fastest (Trane Technologies (TT) +20.5%/yr, Herc Holdings (HRI) -2.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Herc Holdings (HRI) has the highest dividend yield: Trane Technologies (TT) 0.89%, Herc Holdings (HRI) 1.79%. EquipmentShare.com (EQPT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Trane Technologies (TT) has been the steadiest (EquipmentShare.com (EQPT) 83.5%, Trane Technologies (TT) 29.2%, Herc Holdings (HRI) 60.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EQPT, TT and HRI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Trane Technologies (TT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.