EQPT vs R vs FSS Stock Comparison

EquipmentShare.com, Ryder System and Federal Signal Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
R Ryder System Inc
$279.65 +18.7% 1M +66.2% 1Y
Market cap
$10.57B
P/E
20.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.08B
Div. yield
0.01%
Logistics Industrials
8 wins
FSS Federal Signal Corp /De/
$115.92 +1.1% 1M -7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.85B
P/E
24.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.45B
Div. yield
0.01%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ryder System leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Ryder System 8, Federal Signal 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEQPTRFSSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.53B $10.57B $6.85B R
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 280.0x 20.3x 24.0x R
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.6x 19.4x 23.6x R
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +3.2% +24.0% FSS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 4.0% 11.7% FSS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -70.6% 15.3% FSS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.9x 0.8x R
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% R
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — +66.2% -7.5% R
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +26.4%/yr +22.1%/yr R
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 83.5% 32.1% 35.0% R
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 40/100 75/100 FSS

Percentile Scorecard

EQPTRFSS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEQPTRFSS
Valuation 11 #41 of 46 37 #86 of 136 51 #101 of 203
Growth – 62 #47 of 121 94 #13 of 188
Profitability – 27 #84 of 115 90 #20 of 183
Financial Health 28 #34 of 47 4 #137 of 143 75 #55 of 217
Shareholder Returns – 69 #26 of 82 65 #54 of 153
Overall – 40 75
  • EQPT ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • R ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • FSS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEQPTRFSSSPY
1 month +2.1%+18.7%+1.1% -0.2%
3 months -8.4%+7.5%-1.6% +3.9%
6 months -23.0%+12.9%+3.7% +8.2%
Year to date —+46.1%+6.8% +12.9%
1 year —+66.2%-7.5% +12.3%
3 years —+202.7%+102.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+44.7%+26.5% +23.3%
5 years —+222.8%+171.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+26.4%+22.1% +10.9%
10 years —+304.2%+848.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+15.0%+25.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEQPTRFSSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 83.5%32.1%35.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 84.6%29.0%35.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.071.021.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —2.06-0.21 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -60.8%-28.8%-33.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -48.9%-0.9%-13.3% -1.2%
52-week high $34.63$282.13$133.73 $779.14
52-week low $13.59$162.50$104.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEQPTRFSS
P/E now vs peer median 280.0xmedian 25.3x 20.6xmedian 16.3x 24.7xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 1.0x 0.8xmedian 1.0x 2.9xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.4x -2.2xmedian 8.7x 15.4xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 21.9x 11.2xmedian 11.4x 20.9xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 2.6x 3.6xmedian 1.2x 4.7xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 2.38 2.47median 0.82 0.87median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEQPTRFSS
Revenue – $13.08B $2.45B
Gross profit – $2.56B $714.00M
Operating income – -$9.81B $395.40M
Net income – $520.00M $285.40M
Free cash flow – $954.00M $339.20M
EPS (diluted) – $13.41 $4.64
Cash & equivalents $443.00M $198.00M $62.80M
Total debt $3.64B $30.21B $453.60M
Shares (diluted) 260.00M 38.79M 61.50M
Enterprise value $4.53B $9.78B $6.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEQPTRFSS
P/E 280.0x 20.6x 24.7x
P/FCF – 11.2x 20.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 3.9x 19.0x
P/S 2.6x 0.8x 2.9x
P/B 3.1x 3.6x 4.7x
P/Tangible book 3.6x 4.1x 6.3x
EV/EBITDA – -2.2x 15.4x
EV/EBIT – -1.8x 18.9x
EV/Revenue – 1.4x 3.1x
EV/FCF – 18.5x 22.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 6.5x 20.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.47 0.87

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEQPTRFSS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 3.2% 24.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 3.4% 16.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -0.4% 24.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 3.6% 22.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -4.2% 27.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -3.7% 28.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – 3.6% 28.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 2.1% 28.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 11.2% 28.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 8.3% 28.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 13.8% 45.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 4.9% 59.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 1,184% 49.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 47.1% 73.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEQPTRFSS
Gross margin – 19.6% 29.2%
EBITDA margin – -61.9% 19.8%
Operating margin – -75.0% 16.2%
Pretax margin – 5.4% 15.2%
Net margin – 4.0% 11.7%
FCF margin – 7.3% 13.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 20.9% 15.2%
Return on equity – 17.8% 19.4%
Return on assets – 3.2% 11.7%
Return on invested capital – -70.6% 15.3%
Return on capital employed – -80.1% 18.5%
Asset turnover – 0.8x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 5.3x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEQPTRFSS
Debt / assets 51.1% 44.6% 18.6%
Debt / equity 3.0x 2.4x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.9x 0.8x
Debt / FCF – 7.6x 1.3x
Liabilities / assets 83.0% 81.6% 38.2%
Equity / assets 17.0% 18.4% 61.8%
Interest coverage – -25.2x 19.3x
Current ratio 2.4x 0.7x 2.7x
Quick ratio 1.5x 0.6x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – -0.58 7.19

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEQPTRFSS
Dividend yield – 1.3% 0.5%
Net buyback yield – 5.2% 0.0%
Shareholder yield – 6.5% 0.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 28.8% 12.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 15.7% 10.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 5.6% 13.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.3% 17.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEQPTRFSS
Forward P/E 31.6xFY2026 19.4xFY2026 23.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.56FY2026 $14.45FY2026 $4.92FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5,500.0%FY2026 +11.8%FY2026 +16.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.4% +30.6% +10.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.53BFY2026 $14.12BFY2026 $2.79BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +26.3%FY2026 +11.5%FY2026 +28.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +26.0% +2.3% -5.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEQPTRFSS
Held by institutions 42.5% 90.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding 144 579 474
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.3% -0.6% +3.9%
Institutions buying 102 309 249
Institutions selling 23 177 152
Buyers to sellers 4.43 1.75 1.64

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EQPTRFSS
EQPT 1.00 0.17 0.29
R 0.17 1.00 0.33
FSS 0.29 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EQPT, R and FSS?

Ryder System (R) is the largest by market capitalisation: EquipmentShare.com (EQPT) $4.53B, Ryder System (R) $10.57B, Federal Signal (FSS) $6.85B.

Which stock is cheaper, EQPT, R and FSS?

Ryder System (R) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (EquipmentShare.com (EQPT) 280.0x, Ryder System (R) 20.3x, Federal Signal (FSS) 24.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ryder System (R) is cheapest (EquipmentShare.com (EQPT) 31.6x, Ryder System (R) 19.4x, Federal Signal (FSS) 23.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Federal Signal (FSS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ryder System (R) +3.2%, Federal Signal (FSS) +24.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Federal Signal (FSS) has the highest net margin (Ryder System (R) 4.0%, Federal Signal (FSS) 11.7%). On return on invested capital, Federal Signal (FSS) leads (Ryder System (R) -70.6%, Federal Signal (FSS) 15.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ryder System (R) returned the most: Ryder System (R) +66.2%, Federal Signal (FSS) -7.5%. Over five years, Ryder System (R) compounded fastest (Ryder System (R) +26.4%/yr, Federal Signal (FSS) +22.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ryder System (R) has the highest dividend yield: EquipmentShare.com (EQPT) 0.00%, Ryder System (R) 0.01%, Federal Signal (FSS) 0.01%. EquipmentShare.com (EQPT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ryder System (R) has been the steadiest (EquipmentShare.com (EQPT) 83.5%, Ryder System (R) 32.1%, Federal Signal (FSS) 35.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EQPT, R and FSS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ryder System (R) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.