EPAM vs GIB vs IPM Stock Comparison

EPAM Systems, Cgi and Intelligent Protection Management Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc.
$133.45 +23.3% 1M -17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$7.05B
P/E
17.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.62B
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
4 wins
GIB Cgi Inc
$79.64 +17.5% 1M -9.5% 1Y
Market cap
$17.66B
P/E
18.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.99B
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Cgi leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Cgi 5, EPAM Systems 4, Intelligent Protection Management 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEPAMGIBIPMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.05B $17.66B $22.30M GIB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.6x 18.1x -6.0x EPAM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.7x 13.3x 21.5x EPAM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.8% +6.2% +113.5% IPM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.2% 10.9% -14.8% GIB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.5% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.1x 1.2x — EPAM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -17.9% -9.5% -16.9% GIB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.6%/yr -2.4%/yr -21.1%/yr GIB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.5% 32.9% 40.2% GIB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 57/100 37/100 EPAM

Percentile Scorecard

EPAMGIBIPM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEPAMGIBIPM
Valuation 55 #23 of 50 45 #28 of 50 12 #44 of 50
Growth 43 #26 of 45 73 #13 of 45 82 #9 of 45
Profitability 78 #10 of 41 85 #7 of 41 13 #36 of 41
Financial Health 89 #8 of 62 30 #44 of 62 43 #36 of 62
Shareholder Returns 86 #5 of 30 52 #15 of 30 –
Overall 70 57 37
  • EPAM ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • GIB ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • IPM ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEPAMGIBIPMSPY
1 month +23.3%+17.5%-3.9% -0.2%
3 months +32.9%+11.5%-4.4% +3.9%
6 months +16.9%+8.3%-2.3% +8.2%
Year to date -34.9%-13.7%0.0% +12.9%
1 year -17.9%-9.5%-16.9% +12.3%
3 years -36.6%-14.8%+9.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year -14.1%-5.2%+3.1% +23.3%
5 years -80.1%-11.4%-69.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year -27.6%-2.4%-21.1% +10.9%
10 years +104.3%+71.0%-69.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year +7.4%+5.5%-11.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEPAMGIBIPMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.5%32.9%40.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.8%37.0%47.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.410.210.72 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.33-0.29-0.42 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.4%-49.9%-76.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.7%-16.0%-20.0% -1.2%
52-week high $221.40$94.81$2.15 $779.14
52-week low $76.04$61.28$1.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEPAMGIBIPM
P/E now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 17.4x 18.1xmedian 17.4x -6.0xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.7x 2.0xmedian 0.7x 0.9xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.9xmedian 10.7x 10.7xmedian 10.7x -7.2xmedian 10.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.3xmedian 11.5x 13.6xmedian 11.5x -34.8xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x 1.4xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median -3.35median 1.51 3.40median 1.51 0.85median 1.51

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEPAMGIBIPM
Revenue $5.62B $8.99B $25.19M
Gross profit $1.65B – $12.19M
Operating income $563.19M – -$4.54M
Net income $401.67M $1.25B -$3.73M
Free cash flow $482.64M $1.30B -$644.80K
EPS (diluted) $7.68 $4.34 $-0.29
Cash & equivalents $789.40M $440.31M $5.23M
Total debt $25.00M $2.61B –
Shares (diluted) 52.27M 225.49M 13.04M
Enterprise value $2.69B $15.46B -$1.52M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEPAMGIBIPM
P/E 17.3x 18.1x -6.0x
P/FCF 14.3x 13.6x -34.8x
P/Operating cash flow 12.8x 12.7x -39.6x
P/S 1.2x 2.0x 0.9x
P/B 2.0x – 1.4x
P/Tangible book 2.2x – 2.7x
EV/EBITDA 8.9x 10.7x -7.2x
EV/EBIT 10.9x 14.1x -3.8x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 2.2x 0.7x
EV/FCF 12.7x 15.3x -26.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.4x 14.3x -30.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -3.35 3.40 0.85

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEPAMGIBIPM
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.8% 6.2% 113.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.1% 4.0% 32.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.5% – 92.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.9% – 15.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 4.4% – 18.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -2.9% – -14.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 0.1% 2.2% 48.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -9.0% 11.7% -20.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 8.3% 196.7% 47.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -5.2% 5.3% -7.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.8% 23.0% 59.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.3% 8.2% 37.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.8% 7.5% 53.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.8% 9.9% 34.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEPAMGIBIPM
Gross margin 29.4% – 48.4%
EBITDA margin 12.3% 20.7% -9.5%
Operating margin 10.0% – -18.0%
Pretax margin 9.8% 14.9% -16.6%
Net margin 7.2% 10.9% -14.8%
FCF margin 8.6% 14.5% -2.6%
Operating cash flow margin 9.6% 15.5% -2.2%
Return on equity 11.6% – -22.2%
Return on assets 8.7% 7.7% -12.9%
Return on invested capital 11.5% – –
Return on capital employed 14.7% 15.9% -22.1%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.1x 0.2x
Stock comp / revenue 3.3% 0.5% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEPAMGIBIPM
Debt / assets 0.5% 74.4% –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.1x 1.2x –
Debt / FCF 0.1x 2.0x –
Liabilities / assets 23.1% – 43.0%
Equity / assets 76.9% – 57.0%
Interest coverage – 20.2x –
Current ratio 2.8x 0.9x 1.4x
Quick ratio 2.6x 0.4x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.1x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 6.54 – 0.26

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEPAMGIBIPM
Dividend yield – 0.9% –
Net buyback yield 9.9% 5.6% –
Shareholder yield 9.9% 6.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEPAMGIBIPM
Forward P/E 9.7xFY2026 13.3xFY2026 21.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.81FY2026 $5.99FY2026 $0.08FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.1%FY2026 +0.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +8.5% +10.9% +75.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.04BFY2026 $12.21BFY2026 $24.44MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.6%FY2026 +6.9%FY2026 +3.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.9% +2.3% +20.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEPAMGIBIPM
Held by institutions 100.0% – –
Institutions holding 438 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% – –
Institutions buying 232 – –
Institutions selling 160 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.45 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EPAMGIBIPM
EPAM 1.00 0.55 0.08
GIB 0.55 1.00 0.10
IPM 0.08 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EPAM, GIB and IPM?

Cgi (GIB) is the largest by market capitalisation: EPAM Systems (EPAM) $7.05B, Cgi (GIB) $17.66B, Intelligent Protection Management (IPM) $22.30M.

Which stock is cheaper, EPAM, GIB and IPM?

EPAM Systems (EPAM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (EPAM Systems (EPAM) 17.6x, Cgi (GIB) 18.1x, Intelligent Protection Management (IPM) -6.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, EPAM Systems (EPAM) is cheapest (EPAM Systems (EPAM) 9.7x, Cgi (GIB) 13.3x, Intelligent Protection Management (IPM) 21.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Intelligent Protection Management (IPM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: EPAM Systems (EPAM) +10.8%, Cgi (GIB) +6.2%, Intelligent Protection Management (IPM) +113.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cgi (GIB) has the highest net margin (EPAM Systems (EPAM) 7.2%, Cgi (GIB) 10.9%, Intelligent Protection Management (IPM) -14.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cgi (GIB) returned the most: EPAM Systems (EPAM) -17.9%, Cgi (GIB) -9.5%, Intelligent Protection Management (IPM) -16.9%. Over five years, Cgi (GIB) compounded fastest (EPAM Systems (EPAM) -27.6%/yr, Cgi (GIB) -2.4%/yr, Intelligent Protection Management (IPM) -21.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cgi (GIB) has been the steadiest (EPAM Systems (EPAM) 53.5%, Cgi (GIB) 32.9%, Intelligent Protection Management (IPM) 40.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EPAM, GIB and IPM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cgi (GIB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.