EOG vs MLM vs APA Stock Comparison

Eog Resources, Martin Marietta Materials and Apa Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EOG Eog Resources Inc
$163.02 +14.9% 1M +50.8% 1Y
Market cap
$86.06B
P/E
12.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$27.03B
Div. yield
0.03%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
7 wins
APA APA Corp
$51.90 +18.8% 1M +110.8% 1Y
Market cap
$18.24B
P/E
10.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.61B
Div. yield
0.02%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Eog Resources leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Eog Resources 7, Apa 4, Martin Marietta Materials 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEOGMLMAPALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $86.06B $30.32B $18.24B EOG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.5x 12.3x 10.9x APA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.8x 27.5x 8.1x APA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +19.1% +14.8% -16.1% EOG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 25.4% 36.7% 19.5% MLM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 17.7% 6.5% — EOG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 2.8x 0.7x EOG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.01% 0.02% EOG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +50.8% -18.1% +110.8% APA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.1%/yr +5.9%/yr +13.4%/yr APA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.6% 28.7% 44.1% EOG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 34/100 71/100 EOG

Percentile Scorecard

EOGMLMAPA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEOGMLMAPA
Valuation 49 #51 of 99 11 #9 of 10 74 #27 of 99
Growth 77 #23 of 97 – 74 #26 of 97
Profitability 94 #7 of 96 86 #2 of 8 93 #8 of 96
Financial Health 86 #15 of 102 38 #6 of 9 51 #51 of 102
Shareholder Returns 51 #38 of 76 0 #8 of 8 65 #27 of 76
Overall 71 34 71
  • EOG ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • MLM ranked among 10 companies in Construction Materials
  • APA ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEOGMLMAPASPY
1 month +14.9%+3.4%+18.8% -1.0%
3 months +11.3%-9.4%+43.6% +2.9%
6 months +22.5%-17.6%+37.6% +6.4%
Year to date +55.2%-18.6%+112.2% +11.4%
1 year +50.8%-18.1%+110.8% +13.1%
3 years +25.5%+21.8%+26.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +7.9%+6.8%+8.2% +21.5%
5 years +77.2%+33.0%+87.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year +12.1%+5.9%+13.4% +10.9%
10 years +73.6%+182.1%-16.5% +255.2%
10 years, per year +5.7%+10.9%-1.8% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureEOGMLMAPASPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.6%28.7%44.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.2%31.2%42.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.740.84-1.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.78-0.632.51 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.8%-33.4%-72.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-28.4%0.0% -2.5%
52-week high $163.02$708.11$51.90 $779.14
52-week low $101.78$471.33$21.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEOGMLMAPA
P/E now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 13.1x 12.4xmedian 19.7x 10.9xmedian 13.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 2.0x 4.6xmedian 1.8x 2.1xmedian 2.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 5.7x 17.6xmedian 9.3x 4.8xmedian 5.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.5xmedian 11.1x 37.6xmedian 31.6x 8.6xmedian 11.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 1.5x 2.6xmedian 2.3x 2.3xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median -2.79median 2.24 0.32median 1.85 -20.06median 2.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEOGMLMAPA
Revenue $27.03B $6.69B $8.61B
Gross profit – $1.88B $7.81B
Operating income $8.91B $1.38B $2.31B
Net income $6.88B $2.46B $1.98B
Free cash flow $6.35B $810.00M $2.11B
R&D $213.00M – $142.00M
EPS (diluted) $13.00 $40.81 $4.74
Cash & equivalents $4.91B $112.00M $444.00M
Total debt $31.49B $22.09B $17.14B
Shares (diluted) 529.00M 60.20M 354.00M
Enterprise value $70.38B $29.81B $16.51B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEOGMLMAPA
P/E 12.5x 12.4x 10.9x
P/FCF 13.5x 37.6x 8.6x
P/Operating cash flow 6.4x 20.0x 4.0x
P/S 3.2x 4.6x 2.1x
P/B 2.7x 2.6x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 2.7x 2.8x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 6.4x 17.6x 4.8x
EV/EBIT 9.9x 26.3x 9.3x
EV/Revenue 3.3x 5.4x 2.5x
EV/FCF 14.0x 44.8x 10.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 6.6x 23.9x 4.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.79 0.32 -20.06

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEOGMLMAPA
Revenue growth (1Y) 19.1% 14.8% -16.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.4% 1.1% -2.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 7.8% -6.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 3.4% 1.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.2% 3.2% 3,511%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 1.3% 10.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 20.0% 123.2% 54.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -7.6% 37.3% 2.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 23.8% 123.9% 58.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -4.5% 38.8% -0.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.2% -19.7% -2.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.0% 7.5% 5.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.8% -15.9% 33.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.5% 6.6% 7.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEOGMLMAPA
Gross margin – 28.2% 90.8%
EBITDA margin 50.9% 30.9% 52.3%
Operating margin 32.9% 20.6% 26.8%
Pretax margin 32.5% 17.4% 36.1%
Net margin 25.4% 36.7% 19.5%
FCF margin 23.5% 12.1% 24.6%
Operating cash flow margin 49.4% 22.7% 52.6%
Return on equity 21.9% 21.5% 25.8%
Return on assets 12.7% 11.8% 11.0%
Return on invested capital 17.7% 6.5% –
Return on capital employed 18.3% 7.2% 14.8%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.3x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 0.6x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEOGMLMAPA
Debt / assets 14.5% 27.9% 20.8%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.5x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 2.8x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 1.2x 7.3x 1.8x
Liabilities / assets 41.8% 45.8% 55.8%
Equity / assets 58.2% 54.2% 44.2%
Interest coverage 33.0x 5.9x 10.6x
Current ratio 1.9x 1.4x 0.9x
Quick ratio 1.6x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 4.22 2.96 2.01

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEOGMLMAPA
Dividend yield 2.5% 0.7% 1.9%
Net buyback yield 3.3% 0.7% 1.3%
Shareholder yield 5.8% 1.3% 3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 31.7% 8.2% 17.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) 34.3% 24.9% 16.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.4% 4.1% -3.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -19.6% 6.8% 8.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEOGMLMAPA
Forward P/E 9.8xFY2026 27.5xFY2026 8.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $16.60FY2026 $18.47FY2026 $6.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +63.4%FY2026 +13.0%FY2026 +70.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -8.1% +17.2% -20.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $29.40BFY2026 $8.04BFY2026 $8.78BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +29.9%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026 -4.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.2% +26.6% -0.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEOGMLMAPA
Held by institutions 95.8% 98.5% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1,628 1,072 809
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.6% +1.4% +3.2%
Institutions buying 837 469 432
Institutions selling 578 392 244
Buyers to sellers 1.45 1.20 1.77

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EOGMLMAPA
EOG 1.00 -0.32 0.80
MLM -0.32 1.00 -0.27
APA 0.80 -0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EOG, MLM and APA?

Eog Resources (EOG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Eog Resources (EOG) $86.06B, Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) $30.32B, Apa (APA) $18.24B.

Which stock is cheaper, EOG, MLM and APA?

Apa (APA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Eog Resources (EOG) 12.5x, Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) 12.3x, Apa (APA) 10.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Apa (APA) is cheapest (Eog Resources (EOG) 9.8x, Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) 27.5x, Apa (APA) 8.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Eog Resources (EOG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Eog Resources (EOG) +19.1%, Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) +14.8%, Apa (APA) -16.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) has the highest net margin (Eog Resources (EOG) 25.4%, Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) 36.7%, Apa (APA) 19.5%). On return on invested capital, Eog Resources (EOG) leads (Eog Resources (EOG) 17.7%, Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) 6.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Apa (APA) returned the most: Eog Resources (EOG) +50.8%, Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) -18.1%, Apa (APA) +110.8%. Over five years, Apa (APA) compounded fastest (Eog Resources (EOG) +12.1%/yr, Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) +5.9%/yr, Apa (APA) +13.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Eog Resources (EOG) has the highest dividend yield: Eog Resources (EOG) 0.03%, Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) 0.01%, Apa (APA) 0.02%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Eog Resources (EOG) has been the steadiest (Eog Resources (EOG) 28.6%, Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) 28.7%, Apa (APA) 44.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EOG, MLM and APA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Eog Resources (EOG) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.