ENVA vs HTT vs BFH Stock Comparison

Enova International, High Templar Tech and Bread Financial Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ENVA Enova International, Inc.
$170.07 -2.1% 1M +36.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.27B
P/E
11.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.65B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins
HTT High Templar Tech Ltd
$1.90 -20.8% 1M -57.2% 1Y
Market cap
$820.37M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Bread Financial Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Bread Financial Holdings 7, Enova International 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionENVAHTTBFHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.27B $820.37M $4.10B ENVA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.2x — 7.3x BFH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.3x — 8.3x BFH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.1% — +3.9% ENVA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.5% — 14.3% BFH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.1% — 20.2% ENVA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x — -0.8x BFH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +36.4% -57.2% +55.4% BFH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +40.5%/yr +1.8%/yr +7.6%/yr ENVA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.8% 56.9% 39.9% BFH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 75/100 — 81/100 BFH

Percentile Scorecard

ENVAHTTBFH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisENVAHTTBFH
Valuation 86 #24 of 170 – 96 #7 of 170
Growth 79 #35 of 160 – 67 #53 of 160
Profitability 90 #16 of 149 – 86 #22 of 149
Financial Health 66 #54 of 158 93 #12 of 158 73 #43 of 158
Shareholder Returns 55 #62 of 135 – 84 #23 of 135
Overall 75 – 81
  • ENVA ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • HTT ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • BFH ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodENVAHTTBFHSPY
1 month -2.1%-20.8%-1.1% -0.8%
3 months -32.6%-21.5%-4.0% +3.5%
6 months -2.0%-21.8%+15.7% +7.0%
Year to date +8.2%-46.5%+37.5% +12.2%
1 year +36.4%-57.2%+55.4% +13.0%
3 years +327.0%+5.6%+280.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +62.3%+1.8%+56.1% +23.1%
5 years +447.7%+9.2%+44.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +40.5%+1.8%+7.6% +11.0%
10 years +1,810.9%—-37.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +34.3%—-4.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureENVAHTTBFHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.8%56.9%39.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 51.4%59.8%45.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.191.151.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.79-1.011.39 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.8%-64.4%-70.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.9%-61.6%-10.2% -1.8%
52-week high $265.45$4.95$113.40 $779.14
52-week low $119.22$1.90$59.98 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleENVAHTTBFH
P/E now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 11.0x —median 11.0x 7.2xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.6x —median 2.6x 1.0xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.1xmedian 13.1x —median 13.1x 1.7xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 6.9x —median 6.9x 1.8xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x 1.2xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.32median 0.32 —median 0.32 0.62median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsENVAHTTBFH
Revenue $3.65B – $3.96B
Gross profit $2.21B – –
Operating income $878.11M – –
Net income $382.44M – $569.00M
Free cash flow $2.01B – $2.19B
EPS (diluted) $14.47 – $13.88
Cash & equivalents $105.96M $561.74M $3.68B
Total debt $1.61B $879.65M $2.45B
Shares (diluted) 26.43M 500.73M 40.70M
Enterprise value $3.87B -$2.21B -$10.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricENVAHTTBFH
P/E 11.1x – 7.2x
P/FCF 2.1x – 1.8x
P/Operating cash flow 2.0x – 1.8x
P/S 1.2x – 1.0x
P/B 2.7x 0.5x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 2.7x 0.5x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 6.1x – 1.7x
EV/EBIT 6.5x – 1.8x
EV/Revenue 1.6x – 0.7x
EV/FCF 2.8x – 1.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 2.8x – 1.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.32 – 0.62

Growth

14 metrics
MetricENVAHTTBFH
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.1% – 3.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 21.8% – -2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 27.1% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 22.8% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.0% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.9% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 30.5% – 99.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.0% – 4.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.7% – 129.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 34.1% – 11.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.3% – 18.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.3% – 5.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.7% – 18.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.0% – 6.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricENVAHTTBFH
Gross margin 60.6% – –
EBITDA margin 25.5% – 39.7%
Operating margin 24.0% – –
Pretax margin 13.5% – 17.3%
Net margin 10.5% – 14.3%
FCF margin 54.9% – 55.4%
Operating cash flow margin 56.2% – 55.4%
Return on equity 24.9% – 17.0%
Return on assets 5.1% – 2.5%
Return on invested capital 22.1% – 20.2%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.5x – 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.4x – 3.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% – 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricENVAHTTBFH
Debt / assets 21.0% 16.0% 10.9%
Debt / equity 1.0x 0.2x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x – -0.8x
Debt / FCF 0.8x – 1.1x
Liabilities / assets 79.6% 21.2% 85.0%
Equity / assets 20.4% 78.8% 15.0%
Interest coverage 2.3x – 1.9x
Current ratio – 4.8x –
Quick ratio – 2.4x –
Cash ratio – 2.4x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricENVAHTTBFH
Dividend yield – – 0.9%
Net buyback yield 3.2% – 14.2%
Shareholder yield 3.2% – 15.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 7.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 2.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 4.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 1.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusENVAHTTBFH
Forward P/E 10.3xFY2026 – 8.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $16.45FY2026 $-0.04FY2024 $12.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +26.9%FY2026 -233.3%FY2024 +0.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +26.6% – +7.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.65BFY2026 $47.00MFY2024 $3.93BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.7%FY2026 +164.2%FY2024 +2.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +34.0% – +11.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersENVAHTTBFH
Held by institutions 94.5% 2.2% 98.3%
Institutions holding 425 42 421
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.4% -26.1% -14.5%
Institutions buying 239 14 205
Institutions selling 134 21 155
Buyers to sellers 1.78 0.67 1.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ENVAHTTBFH
ENVA 1.00 0.09 0.49
HTT 0.09 1.00 0.11
BFH 0.49 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ENVA, HTT and BFH?

Enova International (ENVA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Enova International (ENVA) $4.27B, High Templar Tech (HTT) $820.37M, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) $4.10B.

Which stock is cheaper, ENVA, HTT and BFH?

Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Enova International (ENVA) 11.2x, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 7.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) is cheapest (Enova International (ENVA) 10.3x, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 8.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Enova International (ENVA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Enova International (ENVA) +20.1%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +3.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) has the highest net margin (Enova International (ENVA) 10.5%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 14.3%). On return on invested capital, Enova International (ENVA) leads (Enova International (ENVA) 22.1%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 20.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) returned the most: Enova International (ENVA) +36.4%, High Templar Tech (HTT) -57.2%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +55.4%. Over five years, Enova International (ENVA) compounded fastest (Enova International (ENVA) +40.5%/yr, High Templar Tech (HTT) +1.8%/yr, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +7.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Enova International (ENVA) 0.00%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 0.00%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 0.01%. Enova International (ENVA) and High Templar Tech (HTT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) has been the steadiest (Enova International (ENVA) 45.8%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 56.9%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 39.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ENVA, HTT and BFH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.